Takstar Pro 82 Review, impressions and discussion thread

Discussion in 'Headphones (full-size)' started by BenF, May 14, 2017.

Which headphones do you want Pro 82 to be compared with?

Poll closed Jun 13, 2017.
  1. Brainwavz HM5/Yoga CD-990/NVX XPT100

  2. ATH-ES700

  3. Isk HP2011

  4. JVC HA-S400

  5. JVC HA-S680

  6. JVC HARX900

  7. Bosshifi B8

  8. B&O H6

  9. B&O H7

  10. Creative Aurvana Live!

Multiple votes are allowed.
  1. BenF
    I used to love Takstar Pro 80. In fact, I bought two of them (still have both).
    I have even recommended them to some of my friends (who ended up being very happy with them).

    However, Pro 80s were too U/V-shaped for me, and it took forever to burn them in to get rid of the extra hot treble.
    I've moved on to better cans, but kept my eye on the inevitable replacement.

    The replacement was teased for months, and as soon I saw one for sale, I jumped on it immediately.
    This may be the first one to get out of China, but it's definitely not the last one...

    Meet the Pro 82:
    It comes in the famous Takstar case.

    I chose the black ones over the silver ones - no regrets here!
    Gorgeous headphones, plain and simple.

    It comes with a soft case, 3.5mm/6.5mm adapter and a 2.2m cable (2.5mm inside the cup, 3.5mm on the other end).
    Takstar continues the tradition of providing cables that are too long.
    Luckily, there is no shortage of cheap shorter replacement cables, that should fit just fine:




    Now let's get to it!

    Comfort is greatly improved compared to Pro 80.
    The pads are larger, thicker and made of better materials. They are fully "over ear" for me, when Pro 80 was a definite "on-ear". If the NVX XPT100 with the ComfortMax pads is 10 out of 10 comfort-wise, and Pro 80 is 6.5 at best - Pro 82 is an 8 at least.
    Pressure on the head is acceptably delicate, yet the headphone sits securely.

    Above you can see a ComfortMax pad sandwiched inside Pro 82.
    As you can see, it is slightly larger, and quite a lot thicker.
    Judging from my experience with Pro 80 (and others), putting much thicker pads instead of originals will
    likely have a negative effect on the sound, but I may experiment later with other pads of similar thickness.

    There is very little leakage outside, if AC is on in the room - no one can hear what I'm listening to from 2 feet away.
    Isolation from outside noise - these are perfect for a noisy office, but not for bus/train/plain.
    Another reason not to replace pads - I'm quite sure other pads will result in worse leakage/isolation.

    It's fantastic! Great impact with a full body, followed by a perfect decay.
    Such bass is hard to find in headphones at any price, impossible at this price point.

    However, to attract "bassheads", Pro 82 has a new feature - bass boost.
    You can boost the bass 3dB or 6dB, and (according to Takstar) it shouldn't affect FR over 300Hz:

    Well, this graph is absolutely incorrect. Using 6dB boost totally ruins the sound, and while 3dB
    doesn't have as much of a negative effect, it's still unpleasant. Not only does the bass becomes flubby,
    but the tonality of everything changes too, Pro 82 sounds hollow and honky. Strongly advise to stay away from this feature.

    So is this not the headphone for bassheads? Not necessarily. Take a look at the graph above -
    the bass is already boosted 5dB over the mids. So this is definitely a bass-heavy headphone.
    It will still attract audiophiles, because it doesn't bleed into mids, and the quality of bass is up to the highest standards.

    Going back to the graph above, don't expect the bass to be linear down to 20Hz - there is a drop-off below 80Hz.
    The headphone is specced down to 10Hz - I could still hear quite a lot at 15Hz - so a healthy subbass is present.

    Here you can see the bass ports closed (no bass boost)

    Here can see the bass ports fully open - a 6dB boost.

    The mids are somewhat recessed - this is a U-shaped headphone, but not as much as Pro 80.
    The timbre of voices is nearly perfect. If only they would step forward a bit!
    I think it's because of the recessed mids that I find myself listening at slightly higher than usual volume - at lower
    volume Pro 82 doesn't sound as impressive.
    You can improve the mids by using foam disks - Tuning Pro 82 with easy mods

    This is the most surprising part.
    Pro 80 had a very hot treble, which took several months of heavy usage to tame.
    Still, it could be too hot sometimes, and sibilance would raise its ugly head occasionally too.
    Pro 82's treble is as detailed and brilliant as Pro 80s, but it doesn't get too hot, and it avoids sibilance like a ninja.
    Here is a great track to test sibilance:

    Even before Taylor Swift starts singing, Brad Paisley (the host) sounds like a love child of Duffy Duck and Silvester on most headphones.
    Not on Pro 82! All the detail is still there (this is not a dark headphone), but sibilance is totally gone!

    I am not a gamer, but I can promise you this:
    a) With Pro 82's bass quantity and quality, explosions will be EPIC!
    b) With Pro 82's clarity, you will have no problem hearing your teammates/enemies
    c) Pro 82 has a larger soundstage than Pro 80, but keep in mind - this is a music-oriented headphone, so it may not be the best in directional cues
    d) You can use a BoomPro cable (if you have one already) with a 3.5/2.5mm TRS adapter,
    or you can buy this 2.5mm/3.5mm cable with a microphone:
    Also, you can just buy a proper USB microphone.
    You'll get better audio too.

    It's 32Ohm and 96dB - fairly easy to drive.

    This is a huge improvement over Pro 80 - all over the frequency range.
    Comfort and isolation are improved as well.

    All of the impressions are OOTB through Oppo-HA2 .
    I'll put it to burn-in, but I honestly can't see it improving much over what I'm hearing.

    Once it's burned in, I'll compare it to some of the other closed/semi-open headphones I have - you can vote (up to 3 votes per user) which headphones you want to compare with Pro 82.
    I will do at least 5 comparisons - so every vote counts!
    The poll (on top of the page) is limited to 10 items, so I had to make some choices for you :)
    I also have these:
    Takstar TS-670
    Edifier H850
    Bosshifi 6/7
    ISK HD9999

    If there will be enough demand, I'll consider them too.
    (see the post below for links to comparisons)

    Also coming: impressions of tubes/SS, different DACs/Amps.

    Where to buy:
    Current prices are about 75$ without the case and 84$ with the case.
    Good news - extra 5$ discount for head-fi members for Pro 82 purchases starting 7 AM PST December 9 - so the price is down to 70$ (after store discount):
    "For all Head-fi members, when they make orders,if they'll leave a message in the order saying they are from Head-fi, we will give USD5 discount, ok ?
    After they submit the order, they need to wait for us to adjust the price for their orders, then they can pay. If they don't need the USD5 discount, we will add a 16GB memory card as gift"

    Warning about some other stores:


    EU residents can buy from Headphoniaks (79 euro with a case): https://headphoniaks.com/en/shop/takstar-pro82-2/

    Couple hints for purchasing at Aliexpress:
    1) Purchase from a seller that offers ePacket. Usually the free shipping options (China Post, Singapore Post and Aliexpress Standard Shipping) take 3-6 weeks to deliver worldwide.
    ePacket usually takes 2-4 weeks.
    2) Purchasing using Aliexpress mobile app gives an extra 1% discount.
    Sometimes, there are additional mobile-only discounts.
    Last edited: Dec 9, 2017
    elkosith, trellus, volly and 6 others like this.
  2. RedHarlow
    Nevermind the v-moda boom pro does not work with them.
    Last edited: May 15, 2017
    I have a Cloud Core and wanted to know if there is a lot of sound difference between it and Takstar Pro 82. Is it worth me to replace my phone with Takstar Pro82?
    thank you so much.
  4. BenF
    Cloud Core is supposed to be an exact copy of Pro 80 (with an addition of a mic).
    For me, the difference between Pro 80 and Pro 82 is pretty big in every range.

    I will soon post a Pro 80 mod, that will make them sound much closer to Pro 82 (about 20$ cost).
    This may be a good alternative, if the mic is critical for you.

    Actually, according to this https://www.head-fi.org/f/threads/h...e-same-headphones.759851/page-2#post-11708404 Pro 80 does sound better than HyperX Cloud. So the mod may not have the same effect on the Core - you should consider purchasing Pro 82.
    Last edited: May 15, 2017
    Hello, thank you very much for the information. Does Pro82 have better building materials compared to pro80? Does it look better built? Thanks.
  6. BenF
    Pro 80 has a pretty high build quality, but Pro 82 is better.
    And I like its looks much more, it looks more "premium".
  7. RedHarlow
    How's the soundstage compared to the 80's? Would you recommend them for gaming?
  8. BenF
    I am not a gamer, but I can promise you this:
    a) With Pro 82's bass quantity and quality, explosions will be EPIC!
    b) With Pro 82's clarity, you will have no problem hearing your teammates/enemies
    c) Pro 82 has a larger soundstage than Pro 80, but keep in mind - this is a music-oriented headphone, so it may not be the best in directional cues
    d) You can use a BoomPro cable with a 3.5/2.5mm TRS adapter, but it will be cheaper to just buy a proper USB microphone.
    You'll get better audio too.

    This is an important topic, so I'll add this info to the first post.
  9. RedHarlow
    I will definitely buy them from aliexpress If I get my next pay.
  10. peskypesky
    They "sound" too good to be true! I'm very interested.
  11. BenF
    What else would you expect from a Pro 80's successor?
    Unless you are looking for a mids-forward headphone, these are hard to beat (at least under 500$).
    peskypesky likes this.
  12. peskypesky
    I cannot believe they come with an aluminum case. :hushed:

Share This Page