jrazmar
500+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2008
- Posts
- 837
- Likes
- 245
Most probably I'm preferring the graphene over the cygnus now because of the slightly recessed mids or could it be that the soundstage is better on the graphene which helps with the overall tuning and separation. I could understand that there may be inconsistency with the builds or different versions of this graphene earbuds being a DIY but maybe I'm just lucky to have a more coherent and ear-friendly unit. Thanks @seanc6441 for your inputs. Do you know if the graphene requires burn-in to sound at its fullest? Listening to it now, I'm still amazed how holographic the sound is and how I can turn the volume more than on the cygnus and EMX500 without sounding "shouty" while maintaining balance across the spectrum. If it could have the mids quality of the cygnus, then this could be the perfect earphone for me. I will report here if that impression changes over time.
Last edited: