@samandhi hi hi, how's the Pavane treating you these days?
Hey there, thanks for asking.
I gotta' say that with the EQ profile that I shared in my impressions (over multiple posts), these are pretty darned good (if almost great)!
Without that profile....... not so much. They are a bit of a mess where tuning is concerned, and I am truly amazed that Moondrop listened to these, and decided: "These are great, release them as they are".
So, all in all, I like them a lot (with conditions).
As you have probably seen, I am off/on in here as of late (lots of work going on)?! What are your newest "heart's desire" buds, if you don't mind me asking?
Thank you for your review! But:
Practically no one of the regulars on this thread owns a Penon bud. There are 8 reviews for the Conductor now, and basically none for any other earbud that is widely appreciated around here. Also these reviewers never post anything else here but their glowing reviews, which shows that they usually don't enjoy buds all that much, which in turn puts a big question mark behind the reliability of those 5 stars reviews.
We have talked before about Penon and how they try to push their products.
Apart from your review there seems to be a general upsurge of posts from other people about Penon buds, which makes me think this is a concerted effort by Penon to gain traction in this thread.
I will certainly not buy anything from Penon and hope others won't either. I am frankly appaled at Penon's marketing tactics.
It is a bit sad, because their products might actually be good, but I'll never know!
Excuses if you find my post to be offensive, it might be the case that you and some others are actually getting into earbuds more/again at the same time and this is but a coincidence. After all the world is a strange place!
Also I have been hanging out in this thread for only two years, it might be that Penon buds where a big deal in the earbud community before I joined this thread?
This is very intelligent, and I think you should be a detective....
If you take it a bit deeper, you will see that this person isn't all that interested in real world conversations about audiophile/non audiophile equipment. Most of this person's post count comes from reviews (where they triple, or even quadruple post the exact same post in multiple threads when a review is posted by them), posting pictures of all the equipment that passes through their doors, band name game (a REALLY "cheezy" way to boost post count quickly), and the like.
The point I am trying to make here, and I am not trying to pick them apart here but, they are professional reviewers that get paid to review equipment. I don't think they are just all about Penon per se', but other companies as well. If you look in their signature (and follow the link), it leads to a website of a company that does nothing but professional reviews; of which, this person is a co-founder. I am not sure that this is illegal to the rules here on Head-Fi exactly, but it is pretty immoral IMO (it WOULD be illegal if it could be proven that they are posting positive reviews only because they are getting paid. There are a couple of names that if you even try to mention their names, it gets automatically redacted, that have done this in the past). Here are some of the companies that this person works for (according to the picture from their business website):
Having said all of that, it is pretty bothersome to see "advertisements" like their review link because it isn't all about enjoying the music on a personal level but is in their best interest because they are vested in a company that needs this stuff to keep the doors open (if you will).
As for illegal on Head-Fi, at the least, I have reported them for triple and quadruple posting in multiple threads just to garner views on their "review".
I didn't want to offend anyone with my previous post, and it was certainly not geared towards you guys, but more towards reviewers who receive the buds for free and don't even usually listen to earbuds. They show up in this thread, link to their review so we get to know this is the best product ever. This is the way Penon and some other companies market their products.
I consider this spamming of this thread. What is happening in this thread usually is products beeing promoted by word of mouth of earbud enthusiasts and their real honest opinions and this is why I hang out here. If I want to watch reviews of people who received a product in exchange for their honest opinion, I'd be going to watch Youtube, but honestly I consider this as a waste of time. We've talked about this not too long ago...
I much more trust the opinions of my buddies on here!
I totally concur with your last statement, and would take those impressions/reviews any day over the "Youtubers"...
Now, I am not saying that so called "professional reviews" are always a bad thing, or even an indicator that they are "shills", or simply not interested...
@o0genesis0o used to frequent here a lot, and was genuinely interested in earbuds (personally), but would post some VERY professional reviews, that were terrific. But he was/is part of the flathead family "as it were".
Time for an exciting announcement! After a short break, our very own
@AsciiJC is back to making their own earbuds! You've seen their progress posts some time ago, but now they have launched their official pre-order campaign for Mascara, the V4 of Valbuds:
https://www.instagram.com/p/DI4PKMdsXhm/?igsh=aWZ2MDl3Y3R5c2J0
I am, as many of you know, a friend of Ascii, but I am posting this on my own volition, just because I think these buds are genuinely very exciting. Why? Ascii has designed the shell from "the ground up," and is printing them in nylon using MJF 3D printing technique. They look, subjectively, really nice. It sports a 15.4 mm Foster-like driver, and is tuned neutral. For instrumentals and vocals. All according to the maker, Ascii - I have yet to hear these myself (but Soon).
More details on the Mascara can be found on the Instagram post, but for those who aren't on that platform, please see the screenshots!



This is fantastic! Thanks so much for sharing, and congrats
@AsciiJC on what looks like it could be a very nice set of flatties...