I agree with your statement. All these cheap "Bery" drivers use probably one-side coat. This layer increases the stiffness of the diaphragm and certainly gives better sound characteristics compared to the usual PU diaphragm, of course this also applies to other coatings and not just beryllium. We also have the case with PK1 150ohm "red film" driver where this red filling is actually a kind of elastic gel that increases the mass of the diaphragm and reduces the ripple-like deformations (reducing distortion).That's why PK1 has more refined sound than PK2.True, 2020 is indeed the year of the beryllium hypetrain in CHIFI. Though, I have a sneaky suspicion that for some of these budget beryllium sets, the CHIFI companies may be using this material as a marketing gimmick to stand out from the fierce competition at that price range.
The official DUNU folks here on headfi made some interesting comments about the lining/material of drivers for beryllium: https://www.head-fi.org/threads/the-discovery-thread.586909/page-2968#post-15288735
"The PVD layer has to be thick enough and the microscopic grain pattern has to be regular enough to confer that pistonic motion beryllium is so famous for. That's why our sub-$100 products (DM-380 and DM-480) are still titanium drivers. Even the TITAN 6, at $139, is only coated on one side."
DUNU says they have difficulty implementing this Beryllium coating in their sub $100 USD gear. And we already see unit variation in macroscopic areas in budget CHIFI in terms of sound and build, so I'm not confident that some of these fly by night CHIFI budget IEMs/earbuds can ensure good QC for all their units when it comes to microscopic application of beryllium in the proper layering. For all we know they are just sprinkling a few flakes of certain coatings on their drivers instead of uniformly applying it in the prescribed quantities to truly be effective. In fact if one coats it wrongly, it may possibly make the driver sound worse by affecting its physical properties. There was also a BGVP DN2 saga recently where the company purported to use beryllium drivers, but someone opened the shell and proved it was a fake claim (BGVP had to withdraw the product). Though who knows, maybe with economies of scale and the evolution of CHIFI and cheap labour/materials in China, maybe these budget CHIFI companies can still turn a profit with these coatings that are implemented professionally.
That's why I was a bit surprised the TMusic Beryllium earbud can be sold at $11 USD!
Branded companies certainly have better technology and spend more time for testing and tuning. It's difficult to compare their drivers with mass-produced aka "savage" drivers.
I’m not saying the "savage" drivers are bad, but they definitely lag behind in terms of sound clarity and resolution. These drivers are good for DIY experimentation, they have a noticeable difference when it comes to different coatings (Ti, graphene, beryllium etc) which is good. Also, they are 100% better than any branded consumer model that is sold at the same price.
I honestly don't think it's bad when pre-assembled models of DIY parts are sold like let's say Openheart, FENGRU etc. That way anyone who doesn't want to assemble their own models or has no experience with it, can try these cheaper solutions that really sound good. Of course the risk always exists due to the lack of quality control.
But what is really sad and rude is when someone from well-known branded manufacturers uses these cheap parts and tries to sell them at a great price
For me they all instantly lose respect