Earbuds Round-Up
Oct 2, 2020 at 10:02 AM Post #49,516 of 75,857
Received my ME80 and Rambo II this week. The ME80 is fantastic. I absolutely love it. The Rambo II on the other hand is a major disappointment. I can't get a good fit with it but even when I shove them in my ears the sound is muddy. Definitely regret the purchase. Great build quality on both of them though.
 
Oct 2, 2020 at 10:07 AM Post #49,518 of 75,857
Received my ME80 and Rambo II this week. The ME80 is fantastic. I absolutely love it. The Rambo II on the other hand is a major disappointment. I can't get a good fit with it but even when I shove them in my ears the sound is muddy. Definitely regret the purchase. Great build quality on both of them though.

You are not alone, unfortunately.

Rambo II is a disaster for me. They are veiled. I regret the purchase too and I will try to return them.
 
Oct 2, 2020 at 10:44 AM Post #49,519 of 75,857
Can you please share your "Neutron compatible eq" for me80 and Bk2 ?
Nameless arrived today, burning in for the moment...
And as I also have Monk+ SL, would also be curious about your Monk lite eq...
I didn't compile one for the me80 yet, and to be honest, it doesn't need it. the default tuning of the me80 is fantastic. I'll still build one and I'll be sure to post it here when I do.

I'll eventually get around to building a peq and wavelet file for the monk+. I don't have the sl version, though.

**edit**
adding monk lite 120 peq file
 

Attachments

  • yinyoo_bk2 ParametricEQ.txt
    372 bytes · Views: 0
  • ve_monk_120 ParametricEQ.txt
    372 bytes · Views: 0
Last edited:
Oct 2, 2020 at 11:05 AM Post #49,520 of 75,857
Last edited:
Oct 2, 2020 at 11:13 AM Post #49,521 of 75,857
You are not alone, unfortunately.

Rambo II is a disaster for me. They are veiled. I regret the purchase too and I will try to return them.
@knightaz

A couple things:

1. Fit. The Rambo 2's are fairly heavy. I too was pretty disappointed with the fit as I got them because of the mmcx only to find when I use any decent cable the buds would displace too easily or fall out. At @assassin10000 's suggestion, I wear many of my buds with the cable over the ear.

2. Sound. The veiled sound stems from two things, the mid-bass bleed and the relaxed upper mids.

Here's the compensation curve the Rambo 2's require:

Screenshot_20201002-073324.png

Here are the files that do this.
 

Attachments

  • isn_rambo 2 GraphicEQ.txt
    1.3 KB · Views: 0
  • isn_rambo 2 ParametricEQ.txt
    373 bytes · Views: 0
Last edited:
Oct 2, 2020 at 11:22 AM Post #49,522 of 75,857
I didn't compile one for the me80 yet, and to be honest, it doesn't need it. the default tuning of the me80 is fantastic. I'll still build one and I'll be sure to post it here when I do.

I'll eventually get around to building a peq and wavelet file for the monk+. I don't have the sl version, though.

**edit**
adding monk lite 120 peq file
Do you mind sharing the autoeq file for the monk lite 120s?
 
Oct 2, 2020 at 11:31 AM Post #49,523 of 75,857
lol... going back to find an old post and just saw this. Yes, that diy mx500 is very under-rated. love mine
Agreed, If I were to pick 2 buds out of the ones I have to keep. It would be the MX500 and the Yincrow X6 (review is coming up soon on it). :joy:
 
Oct 2, 2020 at 11:44 AM Post #49,524 of 75,857

Attachments

  • ve_monk_120 ParametricEQ.txt
    372 bytes · Views: 0
  • ve monk lite 120 oratory.txt
    1.3 KB · Views: 0
Oct 2, 2020 at 11:46 AM Post #49,525 of 75,857
enjoy! The monk lite 120ohms were already a great bud to begin with, but I appreciate the leaner mid bass and better clarity these compensation files bring.
 
Oct 2, 2020 at 11:53 AM Post #49,526 of 75,857
Last edited:
Oct 2, 2020 at 11:55 AM Post #49,527 of 75,857
You are not alone, unfortunately.

Rambo II is a disaster for me. They are veiled. I regret the purchase too and I will try to return them.

Might be worth checking out the Hessian Ansata. Made by the same guy behind Rambo & Ourart. It even looks quite similar to the Rambo II except for a few minor details (so disregard if you're having fit issues). Cheaper as well. The tuning is also purported to be different than the Rambo II. One drawback is that it's not available on AE (I think) but is instead available on Taobao. Unfortunately, mine has yet to be burned in so I'll have to hold off judgement.
 
Last edited:
Oct 2, 2020 at 12:01 PM Post #49,528 of 75,857
Yincrow X6 review: https://www.head-fi.org/showcase/yincrow-x6.22393/reviews#item-review-24443

Rank: S

Nr 1 earbud rec at the moment. :thumbsup:

Will probably get the RW-9 during 11/11.


EDIT: NiceHCK B40 rank from A to B.
you need to run my autoeq file on the k's nameless. :) cleanest basshead sound profile on a bud ever. The bass is not the cleanest but the overall profile is clean and the bass is tastefully monstrous, and I am not a basshead. I can see why many of us are drawn to a more "fun" sound from time to time.

Agreed on the x6. I still have yet to compare my x6 and rw9. I got distracted by the lz a7
 
Oct 2, 2020 at 12:05 PM Post #49,529 of 75,857
you need to run my autoeq file on the k's nameless. :) cleanest basshead sound profile on a bud ever. The bass is not the cleanest but the overall profile is clean and the bass is tastefully monstrous, and I am not a basshead. I can see why many of us are drawn to a more "fun" sound from time to time.

Agreed on the x6. I still have yet to compare my x6 and rw9. I got distracted by the lz a7
Dont use autoeq, but if you can give me the settings you changed I can try. (I use the Neutron Player)
 
Oct 2, 2020 at 12:05 PM Post #49,530 of 75,857

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top