courierdriver
Headphoneus Supremus
Yeah, I would prefer DIP switches myself if I had to choose between filters or switches. I've purposely stayed away from iems with removable filters because of how easy it is to lose the filters (not to mention, some have tiny rubber/silicon gaskets or O-rings...just more tiny parts that can easily get lost). In some cases, the filters can work themselves loose. In others, the threads are easily stripped and won't tighten up at all. For me, filters are a pain in the a**, and too much work. DIP switches are easier...using EQ is even easier. In the end, isn't using filters and DIP switches just another way to EQ an iem to suit your own preferences? I EQ all my iems all the time based on what songs, genres or mood is atm.Definitely a good point, but the ones I've tried so far usually had to compromise one end of the sound spectrum or the other whenever switching filters. Moreover it gets confusing at times, e.g. the FLC8s for example had so many options that I didn't even find trying to test all of them feasible.
For me the ideal "tuneable" IEM should be able to markedly alter its sonic signature based on what filter/switch you've picked instead of just being derivatives of the stock signature. Perhaps a bit much to ask but that's the only way we can likely get multiple sound signatures in a single package.
Also convenience is a factor, as the FLC8s had such little parts that it was not possible to change them on the fly without losing something. RHA/IMR does it better but I personally prefer the DIP switches. They're always there so you don't have to carry anything additional and it's not possible to lose filters or other parts.