The first attempt of ear wings It looks like some radar. It would be cool to install a 6mm micro driver in this partDamn, interesting design.
What does that part do though?
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Earbuds Round-Up
- Thread starter ClieOS
- Start date
-
- Tags
- akg akg-k-319-in-ear-bud-headphone-dark-charcoal audio-technica-ath-cm707 baldoor-earbell-e100 bang-olufsen-a8-earphones blox-anv3 blox-m2c blox-tm7 blue-ever-blue-328r creative-aurvana-air-headphones-over-the-ear crossroads-hr1 dunu-alpha-1-hybrid-earbuds-dynamic-balanced-armature-high-fidelity-headphones earbuds hifiman-electronics-es100-vintage-style-earbud-with-15mm-driver-blue rose sennheiser sennheiser-mx-580-stereo-headphones-with-intergrated-volume-control sennheiser-mx-581-stereo-stereo-headphones-with-intergrated-volume-control sennheiser-mx-760 sennheiser-mx-90-style-series-in-ear-headphone-with-volume-control sunrise-audio sunrise-audio-charm venture-electronics-ve-zen yuin-pk1-earphones yuin-pk3-earphones
AmericanSpirit
Member of the Trade: Night Oblivion
Well TWS has weakness of falling off the ear with rough movements during workouts, this twist rock system could be one of solutionThat design would be wasted on a TWS lol.
Yet another blast from the past!Before this thing goes to cloud of oblivion...
Sennheiser MX90VC, just tried it and it still sounds great, The design still makes sense even after 15 years of its release.
Sennheiser called this "Twist-to-Fit"; like so...Damn, interesting design.
What does that part do though?
The MX 90VC ("VC" indicating that this model came with volume control) was released early summer 2006 along with the MX 50 and MX 70... all had 64Ω drivers.it’s product of 2008, sorry man! Just to keep this bud to show up again on internet before everyone else forget it.
Sennheiser 2006 "MX" Product Series
2006 - Sennheiser MX 50 (64Ω)
2006 - Sennheiser MX 70 (64Ω)
2006 - Sennheiser MX 90VC (64Ω)
Sennheiser MX 90VC SpecsFrequency Response: 18hz - 22000Hz
Sensitivity (Max SPL): 117dB (1KHz/1Vrms)
Impedance: 64Ω
Last edited:
Interesting concept for sure and I can say the same for the specification. The stem is too blocky, like on BT handsfree budsYet another blast from the past!
Sennheiser called this "Twist-to-Fit"; like so...
The MX 90VC ("VC" indicating that this model came with volume control) was released early summer 2006 along with the MX 50 and MX 70... all had 64Ω drivers.
Sennheiser 2006 "MX" Product Series
2006 - Sennheiser MX 50 (64Ω)2006 - Sennheiser MX 70 (64Ω)2006 - Sennheiser MX 90VC (64Ω)Sennheiser MX 90VC Specs
Frequency Response: 18hz - 22000HzSensitivity (Max SPL): 117dB (1KHz/1Vrms)Impedance: 64Ω
I had this 10 years ago. The design was interesting, but these stuff hurt your ears 5min after you put them. It was disaster…
RikudouGoku
Member of the Trade: RikuBuds
Guess the pros/cons with that design is that it either fits you well or it wont lol.I had this 10 years ago. The design was interesting, but these stuff hurt your ears 5min after you put them. It was disaster…
Like I said it was just the first attempt. Today's solutions have a slightly more sophisticated and comfortable ear-hook, ear-fin or wing or ear-ring.I had this 10 years ago. The design was interesting, but these stuff hurt your ears 5min after you put them. It was disaster…
It’s not a perfect solution but it still does its job
Exactly. Today we have a similar problem with some earbud designs, even when you just look at them, you have an uncomfortable feeling in your ear.Guess the pros/cons with that design is that it either fits you well or it wont lol.
RikudouGoku
Member of the Trade: RikuBuds
Seems to be the same store but everything is cheaper on the "niu" store.
Same "business information" paper on both stores.
Have anyone of you bought from this store before?
Judging by aliprice, it doesnt seem like the bell-we ever goes on sale...
Try the CKLewis Audio Store. They have them for $150
Seems to be the same store but everything is cheaper on the "niu" store.
Same "business information" paper on both stores.
Have anyone of you bought from this store before?
Judging by aliprice, it doesnt seem like the bell-we ever goes on sale...
I bought Laidys portable tube amp and MG2 amp. So far ok, abit slow response.They are more into DIY gears.
Seems to be the same store but everything is cheaper on the "niu" store.
Same "business information" paper on both stores.
Have anyone of you bought from this store before?
Judging by aliprice, it doesnt seem like the bell-we ever goes on sale...
Memoryerror
New Head-Fier
- Joined
- Sep 30, 2009
- Posts
- 7
- Likes
- 21
I would be leary of that store.Try the CKLewis Audio Store. They have them for $150
assassin10000
Headphoneus Supremus
Any particular reason?I would be leary of that store.
I've used them for diy parts with no issues.
Serge Bernamej
500+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Jan 10, 2016
- Posts
- 589
- Likes
- 677
Update on EM5 impression: After putting the bass foams and some random foams over them, going through a soft fin, I get a way fuller sound, smooth and perfectly comfy and fit. Kind of a more detailed and controlled Zen. But the sound sig is too different to compare. It's basically an EM5 with more body all over the frequency spectrum.
You would think it would lead to muddy sound and low resolution but it's absolutely not the case. On the contrary.
You would think it would lead to muddy sound and low resolution but it's absolutely not the case. On the contrary.
Last edited:
Have your other earbuds like the Zen LL arrived yet?Update on EM5 impression: After putting the bass foams and some random foams over them, going through a soft fin, I get a way fuller sound, smooth and perfectly comfy and fit. Kind of a more detailed and controlled Zen. But the sound sig is too different to compare. It's basically an EM5 with more body all over the frequency spectrum.
You would think it would lead to muddy sound and low resolution but it's absolutely not the case. On the contrary.