Earbuds Round-Up
Feb 9, 2016 at 5:22 AM Post #2,192 of 75,857
  @Danneq: I just curious about the extension of bass on the Tomahawk. Could you compare the extension and amount of Tomahawk's bass to VE Monk ? I wanna get new earbud that has deeper bass and more energy, forward in mid-range than Monk with price of 50$. Thank you very much !
 


Right now I'm listening to both of them on my Rockboxed iRiver H120. The Monks have great detail and could easily be sold for $30. They are definitely on the same level as, or even above, Yuin PK3 and Blox BE3. Soundstage is really great on the Monks. When I switch to the Tomahawks, I do hear more punch in the bass. Instrument separation and layering is also better. But soundstage is slightly less extended. The Monks sound like $30 or $40 earbuds while the Tomahawks sound like $100 earbuds. At least in my ears...

I can say that the Monks beat my DK-PU wood eabuds that I bought from Aliexpress for $59. Well, bass is deeper and punchier on the DK-PU, but soundstage is much smaller and instrument separation is not as good as on the Monks.
 
Feb 9, 2016 at 11:19 PM Post #2,197 of 75,857
Feb 9, 2016 at 11:30 PM Post #2,198 of 75,857
 
Right now I'm listening to both of them on my Rockboxed iRiver H120. The Monks have great detail and could easily be sold for $30. They are definitely on the same level as, or even above, Yuin PK3 and Blox BE3. Soundstage is really great on the Monks. When I switch to the Tomahawks, I do hear more punch in the bass. Instrument separation and layering is also better. But soundstage is slightly less extended. The Monks sound like $30 or $40 earbuds while the Tomahawks sound like $100 earbuds. At least in my ears...

I can say that the Monks beat my DK-PU wood eabuds that I bought from Aliexpress for $59. Well, bass is deeper and punchier on the DK-PU, but soundstage is much smaller and instrument separation is not as good as on the Monks.

 
You have much more monetarily decisive ears than me, that's for sure! All I know is that if I spent $100 on the Monks, I'd probably think that I got a good deal :)
 
Feb 10, 2016 at 1:22 AM Post #2,201 of 75,857
kinda curious about these, almost like supersized earbuds with 23mm drivers http://www.bedphones.com/FAQ.html


 
Feb 10, 2016 at 1:41 AM Post #2,202 of 75,857
Kind of.  I'd guess maybe something like earclips, the size seems about right.  I know I toss and turn a bit, so I'm not sure these would work for me.
 
Feb 10, 2016 at 1:43 AM Post #2,203 of 75,857
  kinda curious about these, almost like supersized earbuds with 23mm drivers http://www.bedphones.com/FAQ.html



No mention of Freq details... THD.. Resistance etc.. etc.. such basic information. Huh.
 
Feb 10, 2016 at 1:57 AM Post #2,204 of 75,857
  No mention of Freq details... THD.. Resistance etc.. etc.. such basic information. Huh.


lol... hardly worse than a lot of MFRs though... also, at the bottom:
  1. Driver Diameter: 23mm 
  2. Sensitivity: 116 dB/V ±5dB @ 1 kHz
  3. Impedance: 32 Ω ±15%
  4. Plug: standard 3.5mm stereo, gold-plated
  5. Cable Length: 59"/150cm
  6. Frequency Range: 20-20kHz 
 
Feb 10, 2016 at 2:28 AM Post #2,205 of 75,857
   
You have much more monetarily decisive ears than me, that's for sure! All I know is that if I spent $100 on the Monks, I'd probably think that I got a good deal :)



Haha! I'm just comparing the Monks to earbuds that I think are around the same level, such as Yuin PK3 (around $30-35) and Blox BE3 (around $30). And, yeah. If the Monks had fancy packaging and accessories, they could probably be sold for $100.

Edit: And if you would be willing to spend $100 on the Monks, you should really consider the Tomahawks for $50!
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top