Quote:
CLie have you tried the new sony XBA? Do they sound good ? and If I am going to upgrade my iem to the 200 bucks level , which one should I go for ?
I like the sound of Final adagio 3, or the shure se 215, I also like the JVC FXD 80 you reccomended me before , anything like a straight upgrade from those ?
Only the XBA-10, and I prefer it over the XBA-1.
If you like SE215, I'll recommend TDK BA200, Westone UM3X or Westone 4. I can't think of a upgrade for FXD80 for now, and I haven't listened to Adagio 3 before.
Quote:
...
Other than that, I feel as if headphones are graded as much on their sound signature as they are on their objective technical ability; there's a bit of personal preference sneaking in. These types of reviews aren't as useful because people have wildly varying tastes. It's more effective to explain the sound signature, and then evaluate the technical ability.
Overall, though, this is a nice clean, concise comparison. Just want to provide some constructive criticism. For now, though, I'll be sticking to ljokerl's thread as my primary reference.
There you hit a problem - everyone has an interpretation of their own. The goal of this comparison is not to set a hard definition of each sound signature, but to show that there is some observable difference within the seemingly chaotic IEM world and can be categorized in some loose but logical way. It is meant to be a starting point for a search - might not be the best or most correct place to start, but definitely better than just asking 'I have $xxx budget, please recommend me an IEM'. That's really not helpful or useful to both the people who ask or those who try to help.
I asked myself the same question as you have when I started this comparison - does it even make sense to categorize IEM? Who to say I will be the best person to categorize them? Surely everyone has a bias and I can't be that ignorant not to acknowledge it? But then, who to say he/she is the best person to do it, and can do it without any doubt or bias? I really don't think there is such a person, and won't trust a person who would claim such a thing. However, that's exactly the beauty of Head-fi. We don't just come here to set the right and wrong (though sometime we do try as hard as we can), but to discuss the difference among us and trying to be understanding. I know there are people who impression I can totally trust and those who I can't, and I take both side in equal weight because I know I can learn from both, for all the pluses and minuses. It will be foolish to think there is such a thing as absolutely unbiased opinion - we all are product of our own experience, and it is our experience that limits our understanding to this world.
My opinion is just my opinion, whether it is useful for another person or not should be the result of that person's careful evaluation. The better way to do it is to encourage other to write review and comparison of their own, then reader can have better standing for cross reference. This comparison is merely served as one of the reference point within the sea of Head-fi. As I have said in the disclaimer, the reader 'shouldn’t take it as it is'. It is easy just to believe in someone blindly, and that's often the first mistake a newbie will make, trying to take the quick and easy way out that leads to the wrong path. Not to say that I don't think making mistake once in a while is a good thing to 'reset' our prospective, but new comer should be able to learn from old timer and find a shorter path to the right sound. If not, why are we even bother to be in a forum at all?
I was trained as a scientist, and I still remember one thing I learn in graduate school - there is not such thing as absolute truth, but the interpretation of what seems to be the truth.