I am not sure why the need for you to show up here (from nowhere) and pick apart what I have to say, and (seemingly and or possibly purposely) misunderstand what it is I'm trying to say. Saying that masters are usually kept in .wav being one of those. That is an irrelevant statement, because it is still PCM not DSD (in which case there ARE some artists that DO indeed record to DSD). My OG post was not inaccurate (other than the one item I apologized for) and we could argue day in and day out, citing opposing information until "the cows come home" (of which I am sure there is an abundant amount on either side, just like the argument whether cables make the difference in sound or not, for instance), and it would solve nothing.
Why would you bother to ask me for a repost of a link that you are only determined to refute to begin with? Maybe you should have this argument with the creator of the Neutron app (which is where I pulled the information from).
https://neutroncode.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=6143
Another "for instance", I could be passive aggressive and tell you that DSD is actually NOT a transmission/playback format (which appears to be the sort of thing you are doing with all that I say). It was created as a storage format for archived recordings, in which case I would be correct. Then you would say "it may have begun its life as such, but is no longer used in that manner", in which case you would also be right. There are "unmeasurable" characteristics about sound that can neither be qualified nor quantified whether you spout quotes from others or are an engineer yourself. Sometimes math DOES indeed get in the way of being correct where sound is concerned.
I am not going to continue this (pointless) conversation with you (especially parts where you try and "school" me about what a lossless file is and such, as an example). If you feel the need to correct (with your version of whatever it is that you are arguing) feel free to hop on over to the "
Sound Science" threads. I hear they love arguing with each other over there. I don't need to spend all day/every day doing a write-up just to apply added knowledge to back up
@JAnonymous5150's post, which was in reply to
@o0genesis0o's query.
I came to this thread to get away from elitists that think they are better or like to "flex" or show off by trying to discredit others with three-page write-ups. So please don't come in here and try and "talk down" to me as if I were a child that doesn't know any better and cite whatever statistics that make you seem 100% right. You're not, and (as mentioned earlier) I could find opposing citations that would oppose some of what you say. I'm not saying you are totally wrong, you're not. But you are focusing on something that is actually irrelevant (not pertinent) the the actual conversation.
You have yourself a great day sir/madam!
Code:
@samanadhi presses the ignore button for @Kenyon