The reason why I want removable cables, is mainly to be able to switch to my own 3rd party cables that are usually better in build quality and has 4.4mm.
But the more important the reason is that in the unfortunate event that the cable died, I will be able to quickly and safely fix it by swapping cables. I don't even wanna think about what I would have to do if my chaconne cable died...
The one single reason why I bought the chaconne (or any other expensive buds for that matter) is that I use buds at home and to be honest. I don't use them very much. Like my transducer usage is probably 70% iems, 25 % buds and 5% headphones....
So their chances of dying is slim due to low usage and because of the low risk environment (home).
Yep agreed with this, the reasons for having a detachable cable are the following:
1) Better longevity - I've used IEMs for around 16 years, none of them had driver failure but 3 - 4 of them died at the cable (non detachable). So in my experience, non detachable cables are generally the first point of failure down the line. One of my non detachable IEMs died as it suffered an awkward yank, so that's really what I'm afraid of when a TOTL IEM/earbud doesn't come with detachable cables.
2) Use of BT adapters - some of us wanna convert the earbud/IEM to a BT dongle for more convenience.
3) Use of balanced cables or even to cable roll (for cable believers).
I've asked some earbud makers about why some of these TOTL sets don't incorporate detachable cables.
A few reasons they gave me:
1) They claim the tuning was made in mind with the cable in question - for non cable believers, move on. But for cable believers, hmm, even if this is so, I don't believe putting an aftermarket cable will give a night and day difference in sound, unless we are talking about a very crap stock cable with high resistance.
2) putting an MMCX socket on the earbud will sometimes cause the weight and centre of gravity of the earbud to shift from its initial design. I think this is a possible reason, indeed some lighter earbuds, once modified with an MMCX socket that is heavier, may give poorer fit as the stem is now the heaviest part of the earbud.
3) to cut costs. For cheap earbuds in the sub $10 region, eg KBEAR Stellar, Vido, Tingo TC200 etc, a MMCX connector will definitely add costs to the already cheap earbud. Fair enough, but that's no excuse for TOTL earbuds costing 10 - 20 times more for not incorporating an MMCX that is a fraction of its price.
Well, never ending debate here. Some folks do find MMCX may also be problematic with frequent cable changes, and would prefer a non detachable pair, and anyways most of us use earbuds at home due to the subpar isolation, so lesser chance of snagging a cable as such.