IEMusic
Headphoneus Supremus
Finally! Was too lazy, and neglected the BL03. Also, just ordered the BL01.It seems you have joined the mesh mod master race lol.
Finally! Was too lazy, and neglected the BL03. Also, just ordered the BL01.It seems you have joined the mesh mod master race lol.
Lol! And that's why I'm happily divorced. Sell the wife and buy more side grades!Sorry I didn't order this, but perhaps someone else did? It does look quite interesting but I've gotta clear some space in my IEM drawer before getting more sidegrades. The eagle eyed wife is scrutinizing every package that comes in the mail!!!
Keep burning them in and if you haven't already done so, play around with the different filters that come with it. I try to never rush to judgement on anything I get until a significant amount of burn in time, tip swaps and a cable swap or 3.So I finally received my Tape Pro. It only took a month, and the box came with the corner dented in. Now OOTB, I found them to have very undefined bass, and the mids are a bit...shouty. Now i still got some tip rolling to do, and DAP matching, but at the moment, the MT300 is superior to the Tape Pro in almost all categories. Maybe the bass improves with burn in, but so far, the bass on the MT300 slays the bass on the Tape Pro in resolution, speed, and definition. The highs are also superior, much more extended, and natural. Now that doesn't mean these aren't good. They are a good iem, with above average detail retrieval and excellent vocals with a decent stage, but up against similar earphones, they just don't keep up, and that includes the NX7 mkIII. I'd say they are on par with my Sony Z5 or XBA300.
p.s. Been running it balanced out of the X3III and the R5.
So I finally received my Tape Pro. It only took a month, and the box came with the corner dented in. Now OOTB, I found them to have very undefined bass, and the mids are a bit...shouty. Now i still got some tip rolling to do, and DAP matching, but at the moment, the MT300 is superior to the Tape Pro in almost all categories. Maybe the bass improves with burn in, but so far, the bass on the MT300 slays the bass on the Tape Pro in resolution, speed, and definition. The highs are also superior, much more extended, and natural. Now that doesn't mean these aren't good. They are a good iem, with above average detail retrieval and excellent vocals with a decent stage, but up against similar earphones, they just don't keep up, and that includes the NX7 mkIII. I'd say they are on par with my Sony Z5 or XBA300.
p.s. Been running it balanced out of the X3III and the R5.
Sure, and if there was a better sounding version before, then more power to those who got them, because my version sounds very very good, and much better than i was expecting. it surpassed my expectations, and i love listening to music with them.
What I noticed by checking Ali review photos, is that the nozzle grill is not the same in all cases.
The ones sold at the begining had a more specific one:
I guess the more generic grill keeps the price lower.
but at the moment, the MT300 is superior to the Tape Pro in almost all categories. Maybe the bass improves with burn in, but so far, the bass on the MT300 slays the bass on the Tape Pro in resolution, speed, and definition.
If you enjoy the Tape, then you'll love the MT300. I'm almost positive. Can't wait for you to hear them. Biggest surprise of the year for me.
Yeah...frankly I think they all should do this, no matter how much it costs. It kinda pisses me off, when companies make me do their work for them. I've had several sets that needed 100-150 hours of burn in (that's stated right in the manual). It's not just with iems; it's just the audiophile companies in general. I still say...if you make gear, it should sound at its best straight outta the box.that's about right : it is underwhelming compared to other IEMs OOTB. I remembered being disappointed that i wanted to box it up again immediately.
but do give it a chance by putting some playtime. This is one of products that i personally think the company should do preliminary "break in" themself before selling it.
Yeah...frankly I think they all should do this, no matter how much it costs. It kinda pisses me off, when companies make me do their work for them. I've had several sets that needed 100-150 hours of burn in (that's stated right in the manual). It's not just with iems; it's just the audiophile companies in general. I still say...if you make gear, it should sound at its best straight outta the box.
MT300 or NiceHCK NX7 Mk III - I see you have both...I have failed to find a comparison. Would you mind giving me a short run down?
Cheers
That brand name hahahah.
You know when I tried to list the name for my graph database, I had a fun time figuring out how to write the brand correctly cuz I keep forgetting it.Very fun for video reviewers.