Quote:
I think after the revelation that is the MA900 for me, I won't be buying any other full sized headphone that doesn't match it's weight and comfort.
Better sound is worthless if you're constantly missing the comfort of something cheaperthat still sounds great.
Call me crazy, but I prefer the long-term comfort on the K712 over the MA900. I know it's counter intuitive, but let me explain...
The MA900 pads aren't exactly soft and fluffy like the velour on the other too. They're not scratchy, but I
am conscious of them. The material seems to "grip" my skin and hair a little more when I move, which makes me want to adjust them when that happens. They also have that unique and unusual open design, but it comes with a smaller pad surface area. YES, I know the MA900s barely have any clamp, but regardless I'm always more aware of there being that smaller "ring" around my ear - more so than the larger fatter pads which blend in more. Lastly, my ears are touching the drivers more with the MA900. The K712 is like the Q701 angled pads where it either doesn't touch or it's so slight that I don't really notice.
The bottom line is: the K712 disappears more on
my head, I'm less conscious of it being there, and I don't feel OCD to keep adjusting it. That's true despite the MA900s lighter weight, weaker clamp, and more open cups. For every step forward the MA900 has for comfort, there was also a small step back for me.
This is
just MY personal experience. I accept that I'm an outlier and for others the MA900 can/will be the most comfortable. So take it with grains of salt.
Regardless, even if the MA900s
were more comfortable, the sound quality improvement on the others would still be worth it for me, as their comfort is already amazing and more than enough. I can (and already did - for science) use the K712s for 8 hours straight with no issues - isn't
that good enough?
So for me, better
sound comfort is worthless if you're constantly missing the
comfort sound of something that still
sounds feels great.
Quote:
You might get spoiled by the MA900's comfort and decide to sell off everything else and be happy with just that.
I'm of the type to wanna sell off everything and get the MA900 if I were in your shoes. It's left that kind of impression on me.
I sort of doubt that will happen for Change, since it didn't happen for me. And If he did that, he would no longer be following in my gear-footsteps!
The main sonic issue that kept coming up for me with the MA900 was that for
acoustic music like classical and Jazz, the timbre and refinement just wasn't quite there. With electronic genres and what not, the MA900s could sound very nearly as good as the others, and I could probably live with them. When I switched to something like classical though, that's
hyper critical of a headphone's timbre and refinement, the MA900 just couldn't keep up. The others were still on another level. I couldn't justify keeping the MA900s when I knew they would never sound as good with those genres. If you don't listen to a lot of acoustic stuff it probably won't be an issue though.
Quote:
After an extensive session with the MDs I can see the peak in the upper mids chico is talking about...
If the K712 fixes that... then I can justify the loss. But that's just me... too
I know it will still be there. What I'm saying is if the difference is subtle enough then I'm for the improvement. Even if its ever so slight.
I have no issue about the Annie except for the slight edginess in its mids. And that has only come up recently after extensively comparing the two. Overall the Annie's sound is better to me except for the slight peak as I mentioned. It was my favorite until then...
I believe the K712 will fix that, IMO... along with the dense pads issue as you mentioned. While comparing I then noticed my huge ears touch the drivers (not a big issue unless you obsess over it).
I'm the same.
It sounds like your on the right track
(which I've conveniently laid out for you ).
The slightly peak and edgy mids on the Anniversary was one of the main things that pushed me towards the K712. When comparing them, I could hear the K712s were a bit less dry and peaky in that area. Once I'd heard that I couldn't
un-hear it. I know the edgier mids can be nice with female vocals, but overall I prefer the K712's approach.
The were a couple other things on the K712 that won me over, like the the greater overall body to the sound, the slightly more natural timbre and less fatiguing overall sound, and the deeper pads with their extra comfort the slightly more open sound. I I made a pros & cons list, and the last holdout for the Anniversary was the more forward air. If I could have the K712s signature with greater air, it would be awesome, but I can't. I got over it though.