uzi
100+ Head-Fier
Quote:
IMHO, the HD598 is much better than the HD595, so don't sweat it.
Quote:
The problem I had with the ATH-M50 was not its sound. It was fine there. What I didn't like was the discomfort. It got a bit better when I put the pads for the Shure SRH-840 on it, but still not quite good enough. It's more expensive, but I find the Beyerdynamic DT770 Pro 80 Ohm to be a much better headphone in terms of comfort and sound than either the ATH-M50 or the SRH-840 (though I think the SRH-840 had the best isolation of the three).
I've read a fairly large portion of this thread, and it seems that the HD595 and K701 get a LOT of hate.
This concerns me, because I had the HD598, and have the Q701, and between those two stands most of my experience with high-end cans. Is there something I'm missing?
IMHO, the HD598 is much better than the HD595, so don't sweat it.
Quote:
Anyone saying the M50 sucks. Get a better DAC/amp..
The problem I had with the ATH-M50 was not its sound. It was fine there. What I didn't like was the discomfort. It got a bit better when I put the pads for the Shure SRH-840 on it, but still not quite good enough. It's more expensive, but I find the Beyerdynamic DT770 Pro 80 Ohm to be a much better headphone in terms of comfort and sound than either the ATH-M50 or the SRH-840 (though I think the SRH-840 had the best isolation of the three).