isquirrel
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Dec 29, 2012
- Posts
- 1,739
- Likes
- 580
i heard you saying 234 is better than wa5 before, but sound signature wise, how close are they? of course using the same tubes combinations.
I have not heard the two Amps side by side with the same tubes so I'm not going to go there. Matt on the other hand owned a WA5 SE, hopefully he will chime in.
I do know he has not heard them side by with the same level of tubes he has now. I think the relevant point he made is that the 234 running stock tubes outperforms the WA5 on good NOS tubes by a substantial margin. When you are getting into the rarified levels of WE300B's, 422a's, Takatsuki's, Elrog's etc that's not going to be an easy comparison.
Will there be a difference yes, quantifying how much (not getting involved in any value equations) is best left to someone who has owned both. I have never had a WA5.