fraseyboy
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Aug 11, 2005
- Posts
- 4,977
- Likes
- 35
Brief sound impressions on SR-Gamma Pro out of SRD7-Pro:
The detail and speed is remarkable, they pretty much achieve what I was looking for in that respect. You can focus on one instrument and just follow that if you want, everything is nicely separated. However, they're are very revealing of badly recorded music, Muse especially sounds bad on them from my experience. In direct comparison, the AD700's sound blurred.
The soundstage is very big horizontally and positioning is dead accurate. It appears to be even larger than the AD700's. However, they aren't as up-front and 'gradoey' as the AD700's, just a bit more laid back.
Midrange is quite good. Not as warm and 'plastickey' as the AD700's, much more neutral. Certainly not recessed and very detailed like the rest of the spectrum. The highs are sparkly and detailed and sound a bit less grainy than the AD700's.
The bass is very lacking until I start using my LD MK2 as a pre-amp, then it becomes a bit more noticeable. It extends quite deeply, but lacks punch much like the AD700. I have to say though, the AD700's do have more bass punch.
It's funny, going from the AD700's to the Gamma's is like going from 128k MP3 to FLAC, but I still find the AD700's extremely enjoyable and fun. They're nowhere NEAR as detailed and the separation isn't as good either, but they're still fun to listen to. I sorta prefer the upfrontedness too. The gamma's sound like they're a few rows back.
Oh also, I think the AD700's may have met there match for comfort. The Gamma's are pretty comfortable. And they don't itch like the AD700's do.
I'm hoping the Lambda Pro's will give me all of this and more
No, my tubes aren't purple, my camera just see's a different orange to me. But they sure do look cool that way
The detail and speed is remarkable, they pretty much achieve what I was looking for in that respect. You can focus on one instrument and just follow that if you want, everything is nicely separated. However, they're are very revealing of badly recorded music, Muse especially sounds bad on them from my experience. In direct comparison, the AD700's sound blurred.
The soundstage is very big horizontally and positioning is dead accurate. It appears to be even larger than the AD700's. However, they aren't as up-front and 'gradoey' as the AD700's, just a bit more laid back.
Midrange is quite good. Not as warm and 'plastickey' as the AD700's, much more neutral. Certainly not recessed and very detailed like the rest of the spectrum. The highs are sparkly and detailed and sound a bit less grainy than the AD700's.
The bass is very lacking until I start using my LD MK2 as a pre-amp, then it becomes a bit more noticeable. It extends quite deeply, but lacks punch much like the AD700. I have to say though, the AD700's do have more bass punch.
It's funny, going from the AD700's to the Gamma's is like going from 128k MP3 to FLAC, but I still find the AD700's extremely enjoyable and fun. They're nowhere NEAR as detailed and the separation isn't as good either, but they're still fun to listen to. I sorta prefer the upfrontedness too. The gamma's sound like they're a few rows back.
Oh also, I think the AD700's may have met there match for comfort. The Gamma's are pretty comfortable. And they don't itch like the AD700's do.
I'm hoping the Lambda Pro's will give me all of this and more
![biggrin.gif](http://www.head-fi.org/forums/images/smilies/http://hfimage.head-fi.org/smilies/biggrin.gif)
![118hv5t.jpg](http://i39.tinypic.com/118hv5t.jpg)
No, my tubes aren't purple, my camera just see's a different orange to me. But they sure do look cool that way
![biggrin.gif](http://www.head-fi.org/forums/images/smilies/http://hfimage.head-fi.org/smilies/biggrin.gif)