droid23
100+ Head-Fier
So, the base target here is a target curve by a single person and his/her individual preferences. > That's the basis to understand the grey dotted line. Now, if you go and display a measurement of an IEM interpolated with this target, you can see how far off a particular IEM is to Precog's "ideal". When you then add another IEM, you can at least see the differences to A) Precog's ideal AND B) the difference to each of the two IEM's independently. >> It's not perfect since such individual target curves are certainly not standardized. They can only help you better IF you have a relatively similar preference like Precogvision has (so you better know exactly his preferences what he likes and dislikes).Oh ho.. You have to make sense of it for me. Am graph-illiterate
But in the end we can guesstimate DaVinci vs. Explorer:
> DaVinci has slightly more presence in sub bass and mid bass
> DaVinci's mids are all so slightly audibly more taking a back seat compared to the Explorer... but not much
> DaVinci has an audible push in the upper pinna gain region 3-5kHz and shoud sound a tiny bit more forward with e.g. voices
> everything above 5kHz, the treble region, is roughly identical
EDIT: but please be aware, you simply cannot, never, know exactly how an IEM sounds only by looking at such graphs.. maximally it can give you a rough idea, because there are many many more influencing factors of how an IEM sound than just the tuning curve > IEM shell design and material & nozzle length (anatomical fit), driver implementation, nozzle design, and the usual suspects like cable and tips used...
Last edited: