- Joined
- Dec 27, 2010
- Posts
- 9,018
- Likes
- 1,769
That's interesting...I'm in total agreement on the idea of component synergy, I guess personal SQ preferences have a lot to do with it as well. I, for instance, think it is much more organic sounding than my DX90, more flesh on the bones, so to speak. I've hardly touched the DX90 since getting it. And, to my ears, it has worked well with every headphone I use EXCEPT my Ety 4s, didn't like the combo. Oh well, different strokes and all that...
As for need, no one "needs" anything but their phone, it's more a "want" thing, as in, "i want the best sound I can afford".
Oh, and eventually (which, with LH Labs could be tomorrow or in 2 years...) I have a Wave coming, fully tricked out. I expect it will be much better than the Pono, but for the cost differential it had better. Have no idea how the base Wave and Pono will compare, but I assume comparisons will be posted and strong opinions well be heard.
Let me put this in another perspective. The advantages I achieve running Sony H3 with Pono compared to iBasso DX50 are minimal at best, the advantage is forgivable imo, and I put this down to Sony H3's warm signature and tonality being less revealing of the source. ER4S on the other hand are a lot more transparent, much more so when you consider its ability to reveal detail, micro detail, and I believe its this reason I pick up such larger differences. It does leave the question of whether spending big money on a source really benefits warmer or darker IEM / headphones to the same extent.
I like my Pono player, but its not the end to all in my stable.
Makes sense that a more revealing headphone let's you hear more of what the Pono brings to the table...the Zen is great with the Pono (I've only heard it single ended, some have it balanced for the Pono, and love it!)
And, I just WISH the Pono was the end game for me...but, as the old standard goes, "if this isn't love, it'll have to do, until the real thing comes along...")