TeeReQs
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Nov 2, 2016
- Posts
- 398
- Likes
- 53
I've only read good things about them. Might have to pull the trigger..
The entire high end Focal lineup is like that. For music, yeah go ahead, for games even $120 PC37x beats themGood to know. Elex is more in my price range anyways, but any idea if they are similar to the clears in regards to soundstage?
I don’t have a ps3 to test but I’m pretty sure it works the same as ps4.Hey guys, since I can't find this info anywhere, does anyone know/has anyone tested if the Creative Sound BlasterX G6 works with a PS3?
For Mic purposes, dunno. For dac/amp purposes there’s no reason for it not to as you would be using the optical in for audio. Just set the PS3 to bitstream Dolby Digital and optical as the primary and you’re good to go. If for some reason the PS3 can’t power the unit properly then just use an external USB power source.Hey guys, since I can't find this info anywhere, does anyone know/has anyone tested if the Creative Sound BlasterX G6 works with a PS3?
Unless your have an Audio Precision analyzer builtin your ears I wouldn't care.So, maybe I’m misunderstanding this as the Soundblaster X3 product page uses some different measurement specs to that on the SXFI Amp product page and maybe any differences would be too marginal for the average ear to perceive anyway, but the the two specs their product pages do both list, SNR and THD + N, appear to be weaker for the X3. . .?!
Soundblaster X3: 115dB SNR, 0.0004% THD + N
SXFI AMP: upto 120dB SNR, 0.0003% THD + N
Given that the DAC is obviously different/cheaper (they make a big song and dance about the AMP using the AKM4377 but nothing on the X3), I wonder if the amplification side of components is weaker too? I mean the MSRP is markedly less despite having a whole heap more functionality / versatility.Unless your have an Audio Precision analyzer builtin your ears I wouldn't care.
I haven't heard the 1990, but I would always go planar before dynamic drivers.if price doesn't matter, what's better for gaming: DT 1990 or Hifiman ananda?
Do you like them more than the lcd gx meeting my questions in the above post?I haven't heard the 1990, but I would always go planar before dynamic drivers.
And the Ananda does absolutely everything well. I think overall, the Ananda is probably the safest choice in headphones in the higher end market.
Yes. The GX has some polarizing features. The Ananda may not be MAGICAL in one specific trait, but it's a do it all well kind of headphone. If I was gonna buy a headphone at that price range, personally that would be the one I would go for. Personally speaking.Do you like them more than the lcd gx meeting my questions in the above post?