Jan 9, 2022 at 2:49 AM Post #47,656 of 48,677
I liked the Siberia V1. I got one for my ex-gf. One of the most comfortable fullsized headsets there is. You swap out the pads? I remember the V1s being velour.

In other news, I finished the KPH40 review. I'll edit and post on Monday.
I did swap pads but just today; the originals were fake leather which disintegrated on me - as in literally flaking off. The ones I found aren't much different. Oddly now they seem to press on my temples but not the rear of my ears. Oh well, they still sound pretty good.
 
Jan 9, 2022 at 3:57 AM Post #47,657 of 48,677
Initial impressions after the evening. No EQ settings for music or gaming. I learned that I do not like Dolby Atmos - sounds too airy and a bit spacy in a bad way; sounds may be placed precisely but they're not as sharp as I'm used to. Treble felt way too boosted. I switched to Creative's virtual 7.1 where the audio feels sharper. Positioning was just fine. This also was the first time I'd experienced open-backed headphones. It's definitely weird and will take some getting used to, which I expect will not be a problem. Game for tonight was Battlefield 2042 while chatting with buddies over Discord, the perfect opportunity to test that all-important chatmix functionality as well.

Initial impressions:

Sound Blaster X4 DAC/AMP:
Very pleased so far. Seems to have had no problem powering anything thus far; there's a software control for impendence I adjusted. Software is intuitive and easy. Controls are too. I wish that the Audio Balance feature (game/chat mix, basically the reason I bought this thing) could be used with Direct Mode but no big deal. Had a funny issue with only outputting the right channel to headphones until I plugged in briefly to the speaker outs on the rear, then switched back; no idea what was going on there but it's the only issue I've had.

Mackie MC-450
Overall I wasn't as impressed as the other two headphones though I will revisit these. Bass is there but not pronounced. Good clarity on Flynn Lives (TRON Legacy Soundtrack) to where I could hear noise from orchestra members. Neat soundstage on Mountains from the Interstellar soundtrack; that metronome or whatever it is sounded forward in a way I hadn't heard before. Vocals on Stadium Arcadium sounded forward in a new way; very cool. For gaming, though, they felt a bit muddy to me; not as sharp as other headphones. I'll try again with them, both with music and games.
EDIT: Second time around with these was much better and I'm glad I went back. Extremely open, round, airy soundstage. Very crisp, precise sound, my initial impression was dead wrong there. Their overall sound with music felt shallow, like there wasn't much meat on the bone so to speak, but extremely detailed.

DT990 600 Premium
Wow, I see what the fuss is about. Wonderfully sharp sound, great bass. Gigantic, spacy and wonderful soundstage; positioning was excellent as advertised though I did recognize that "hole" from 5-7 o'clock. Everything from that direction sounded to be in the same place but it really wasn't a big deal at all and had zero impact on my enjoyment. But besides the "hole" the whole battlefield opened up around me with these and I found myself paying relying on direction of sounds in ways I hadn't before. These headphones are fantastically light, I was surprised at the weight of the box and the headphones themselves almost feel like they aren't there. Not sure yet about the almost furry earpads. I wish the cable was removable but no big deal. I only gamed with these, I'll very much look forward to trying music soon. I can also see how the treble from these can be fatiguing; it was starting to get that way for me after a good 75 minutes playing. Not sure if EQ can take care of that without sacrificing what these are so good at.

M1570
These have been a treat. Big sound, great bass. With no EQ they sounded just slightly less sharp than the DT990's overall. In-game positioning was great. That slightly less-sharp sound persisted for music until I threw my normal Winamp EQ at it (I'll have to fiddle more another time) and then they rocked. If I stick with these I'll probably adjust the general system EQ to sharpen the sound. That wonderful bass in Solar Sailer off the TRON Legacy Soundtrack strobed lusciously and I felt like it was tightly controlled in a way I hadn't heard; the strings sang. Cornfield Chase from the Interstellar soundtrack sounds wondrous, especially that pipe organ; the bass to the lower notes was just amazing. If I close my eyes the notes seem to hang in the air around me in a beautiful soundstage. No Time For Caution felt like all of the various instruments layered together such that I could mentally focus on each layer to enjoy them as opposed to listening to a mooshed-together amalgamation of them all. The huge, booming bass on that track sounded amazing. Binary Finary's 1998 off of Tranceport was a ton of fun; I got detail out of the bass notes I hadn't heard before. I felt like the growling guitar in Bush's Comedown distorted a bit but that could easily be the song and not the headphones.
Oh and speaking of big, these headphones are enormous. The case they come in is seriously large enough to be a hat case. The headphones themselves are gigantic cans and heavy with big, chunky mini-XLR connectors; kind of cool, honestly, in an 80's Cyberpunk sort of way. I was quite surprised to also find them extremely comfortable to wear, even for an extended period. The lambskin earpads feel luxurious. They also feel warm and I'm worried that if I find myself gaming in the summer with these my ears will be quite warm; good thing they're open-backed. Maybe I should expect all of this from $600 headphones? I honestly have never listened to such expensive audio gear before. But God help me I think I like it.

Final Thoughts for now
I'm looking forward to trying the DT990's for music and fiddling with the MC-450's a little more to give them a fair shake. I of course still have the HE400SE's on the way as well if Amazon/HiFiMan ever gets around to shipping them; ETA late next week. I am sorely tempted to try and order a pair of HD600/650/6XX's (as so many lists of high-end gaming headphones list them) just to see how they compare, but then again I'd love to order about five or six others in addition so I shall resist! I think tomorrow I'm going to try and break out some Pink Floyd off of Pulse to see what I get out of it, dig into some more Audioslave, and I have a live jazz CD that I think will work great for this test after I dig it out of storage and re-rip it in FLAC.

The other big variable here is that I have a Steelseries Chatmix dial on order from eBay. That one piece of hardware was the main driver in ordering the Sound Blaster X4 instead of an actual headphone DAC/AMP. If I can make that gadget work with normal headphones - and work well - then I could potentially ditch the X4 and buy an actual headphone DAC/AMP instead of a gaming product (PC USB --> Chatmix Dial --> DAC/AMP --> Headphones). The question is whether there's a sound quality difference to be gained there and I'm not really sure there is, especially if I'm using Dolby Atmos which I presently dislike. Moreover I don't know that my ears are refined and/or experienced enough to really tell much of a difference, especially at my price points. My gut so far is telling me it may not be worth the trouble.

Thanks to the many of you who have been of help thus far. I'll look forward to posting more impressions as well as some photos.
 
Last edited:
Jan 9, 2022 at 9:52 AM Post #47,658 of 48,677
@JdeFalconr If you use EQ APO, here's my current EQ for the M1570:

Code:
Filter: ON LSC Fc 115 Hz Gain 7.5 dB Q 0.71
Filter: ON PK Fc 1100 Hz Gain -1.2 dB Q 2
Filter: ON HSC Fc 1300 Hz Gain 7 dB Q 0.71
Filter: ON PK Fc 3050 Hz Gain -1.8 dB Q 3
Filter: ON PK Fc 5000 Hz Gain -5.1 dB Q 4
Filter: ON PK Fc 8100 Hz Gain -4.6 dB Q 6
Filter: ON HSC Fc 10000 Hz Gain -3.8 dB Q 0.71
Preamp: -3.5 dB

Based off of Oratory1990's M1570 Lambskins targeting Harman Curve, adjustments for my tastes. Use the various shelfs to adjust tuning. Mind you I also have GE JAN 5654W tubes on my audio chain.
 
Last edited:
Jan 9, 2022 at 10:21 AM Post #47,659 of 48,677
Jdefalconr, If you like dt990 for competitive gaming, you might as well try the dt1990 as an upgrade, and it's within your price range after you return what you dont like. Looking forward to your feedback on the HE400se vs DT990 vs M1570 in fps gaming.

Chastity, i already have M570 and only use headphones for competitive gaming. Will i benefit significantly by upgrading to M1070open or M1570?
 
Jan 9, 2022 at 4:59 PM Post #47,660 of 48,677
I like the way you approach this, i'll try to repeat those tests, except I don't own any of those games, neither do I play such games:frowning2:
The only things that I have would be Ghost Recon Breakpoint :/
I was only referring to competitive FPS games to be tested for his open back headphones with a focus on accurate imaging. In your case, TH900 vs LCD GX, which are not the best for competitive, i would follow a different approach and test them for:
- bass quality: which one has a more immersive rumble in its explosions
- bass texture: which one has more meat and detail in its bass. Explosions sounding more full and not congested or tinny or thin etc...
- bass control: which one prevents explosions from masking all other sound details in the spectrum, that is preventing the bass from bleeding all over the sound signature
- detail retrieval
- immersion factor: which one is more immersive in single player games, and blocks out all external noise
- soundstage:which has a bigger staging in open world games like the witcher 3
- games to test with: Single player Horror or Scifi games. Games where u want to feel the rumble of explosions, feel isolated and immersed, feel scared.
I would not try those 2 headphones with competitive shooters. Please do share your feedback as these 2 are on my shortlist and i need to buy one. TH900 is closed back while GX is open.
 
Last edited:
Jan 9, 2022 at 5:25 PM Post #47,661 of 48,677
Thank you! I'll give it a go. I was just going to use the EQ integrated with the Creative app but I'll try that application. I've heard these EQ profiles by Oratory1990 referred to a number of times in relation to making the M1570's really shine.

EDIT: What do I do with the values you gave me? Just plunk them direct into the config.txt file? That file looks formatted differently by default:
Code:
Preamp: -6 dB
Include: example.txt
GraphicEQ: 25 0; 40 0; 63 0; 100 0; 160 0; 250 0; 400 0; 630 0; 1000 0; 1600 0; 2500 0; 4000 0; 6300 0; 10000 0; 16000 0

Jdefalconr, If you like dt990 for competitive gaming, you might as well try the dt1990 as an upgrade, and it's within your price range after you return what you dont like. Looking forward to your feedback on the HE400se vs DT990 vs M1570 in fps gaming.

Chastity, i already have M570 and only use headphones for competitive gaming. Will i benefit significantly by upgrading to M1070open or M1570?

Appreciate the recommendation, thank you. I'd love to give them a go but sadly that price point of about $650 is above my limit of $400, and even that's pushing it a bit. I planned to return all but one of the headphones I'd purchased. I keep getting the itch to try more headphones within my budget as I would hate to miss something "amazing" I just wasn't aware of before. But I think I could be tempted to do that forever and I need to remind myself this purchase doesn't have to be my last one.
 
Last edited:
Jan 9, 2022 at 7:03 PM Post #47,662 of 48,677
@Chastity So I installed Equalizer APO and put in your EQ settings. I must be doing something wrong...there's still a muddy, imprecise quality to music when I go with the APO EQ settings, whether yours or Oratory1990's (as I've tried to enter them). I get sharpness if I turn on Winamp's EQ. Am I doing something wrong or is this more of a personal preference thing? Winamp's settings don't have values that I can extract somehow but here's what my preferred EQ curve looks like:
Winamp Rock Preset.png
 
Jan 9, 2022 at 10:53 PM Post #47,665 of 48,677
@Chastity So I installed Equalizer APO and put in your EQ settings. I must be doing something wrong...there's still a muddy, imprecise quality to music when I go with the APO EQ settings, whether yours or Oratory1990's (as I've tried to enter them). I get sharpness if I turn on Winamp's EQ. Am I doing something wrong or is this more of a personal preference thing? Winamp's settings don't have values that I can extract somehow but here's what my preferred EQ curve looks like:
Copy my text and save it to a .txt file. In EQ APO, on the config.txt tab, add an Control...Include, and load the txt file there. If you hit the up arrow icon, it will open the file in another tab and you can edit the settings there.

As for the DT-990 and DT-1990, I owned the DT-990 Pro, and own the DT-1990, and my M1570 is my upgrade for the DT-1990.

Chastity, i already have M570 and only use headphones for competitive gaming. Will i benefit significantly by upgrading to M1070open or M1570?
Yes. The M570 isn't as spacious as either the M1070 or the M1570. The M1570 is the fuller sounding of the two, tho if only for gaming the M1070 will do great. They've been on sale for $219 recently in the summer (I paid $239). Last sale they were $299. If M1570 is $399, and M1070 is $299, then consider the M1570. If the M1070 is $219, then get that. (I own both, I got the M1070 first, then a few months later the M1570 to satisfy my curiosity. I kept the M1570, and with my EQ settings and tubes, the sound quality went to the next level, and are entry-level summit-fi quality. I thought the Dt-1990 had nice imaging, but these are another level, as I can close my eyes and picture the sound room where the music is recorded, and the vocals are VERY natural sounding, and can be very intimate as well.)
 
Last edited:
Jan 10, 2022 at 4:46 AM Post #47,666 of 48,677
I was only referring to competitive FPS games to be tested for his open back headphones with a focus on accurate imaging. In your case, TH900 vs LCD GX, which are not the best for competitive, i would follow a different approach and test them for:
- bass quality: which one has a more immersive rumble in its explosions
- bass texture: which one has more meat and detail in its bass. Explosions sounding more full and not congested or tinny or thin etc...
- bass control: which one prevents explosions from masking all other sound details in the spectrum, that is preventing the bass from bleeding all over the sound signature
- detail retrieval
- immersion factor: which one is more immersive in single player games, and blocks out all external noise
- soundstage:which has a bigger staging in open world games like the witcher 3
- games to test with: Single player Horror or Scifi games. Games where u want to feel the rumble of explosions, feel isolated and immersed, feel scared.
I would not try those 2 headphones with competitive shooters. Please do share your feedback as these 2 are on my shortlist and i need to buy one. TH900 is closed back while GX is open.
Thanks, will do asap
 
Jan 10, 2022 at 11:23 AM Post #47,667 of 48,677
Hey guys, happy belated new year! Don't ever say I haven't at least posted a review each year. :wink:

Here's my Koss KPH-40 Review!


----------
----------



Koss KPH40 Utility

S0LzEpf.jpg
$40 as of Jan 2022
Where To Buy: Koss.com,
Amazon.com

Disclaimer: While I'm now under the employ of Audeze, I am still a reviewer at heart, and have the freedom to continue doing reviews as long as it's not in direct conflict with Audeze. As the KPH40 is a value product in a niche form factor where Audeze hasn't quite gone to (trust me, I'd kill for an on ear planar with ear clips like the KSC75), I do not see any issues or conflicts of interest here. That being said, everyone, go buy some Audeze headphones, please and thank you. Let them know I sent you. :wink:

I purchased the KPH-40 with my own money, and have not been influenced in any way to speak positively or otherwise about the product. I do my best in being 100% honest with my views and opinions. If I don't like a product, I will refuse to write a review of it, or at the very least mention what I don't like about them, though I like to focus on products that people would like or at the very least are interested in. The only bias I have is to my readers. No one, Koss or otherwise, paid or asked me for anything.

For anyone asking for KPH30i comparisons, I'm sorry, but I had zero interest for the 30i, the simple reason being entirely because they were not compatible with the Koss ear clips. No ear clips = no go. My attachment to Koss has really only ever been with the KSC75, KSC35, Sportapro, and Portapro, all which have interchangeable clips/headband mounts. Now you can add the KPH40 to that list. Nothing against the KPH30i which I'm sure is an absolute banger, judging by all the praise it receives.

update 1/28/2022: Like a self fulfilling prophecy, the KPH40's right side side has already went silent. As you can probably surmise, just as I mentioned on this review, this likely means the cable connecting to the driver has gone bad. Record setting pace for the cable defect. So the fancy, swappable cables means jack squat in the face of an issue up the chain and next to the driver.





Intro

As a decades-plus fan of the venerable Koss clip-ons (and owner of about 300,000 broken KSC75s and other 60-ohm Koss variants mainly due to cable failures), the moment I heard of the KPH40 and saw the rear housing being updated from the older housing used on the KSC35, PortaPro, SportaPro (all variants of these models), I knew I had to see if there was a legitimate change apart from the housing.

Being accustomed to buying SportaPros (as they're usually the cheapest model that use the same drivers as the others), and attaching a headband to them (in my case, KSC75 clips), I needed to see if Koss finally gave us a true alternative to sourcing your own headband to use with all these drivers (for those that do not want to use clip ons, or the original, chunky SportaPro or PortaPro headbands).

Then there's the fact that Koss finally, FINALLY decided to use detachable cables. But wait...Koss, this isn't what we meant by detachable! Ah well, at least they tried. The idea and execution is actually pretty good, albeit still lacking the one key component that would make Koss rise well above the heavens: MMCX connectors. Maybe one day Koss. MAYBE ONE DAY.

So have we finally received an official Koss version of "clipping on good Koss drivers to a Parts Express like-headband"? Yes, we have, and it's actually BETTER than that.



What's In the Box

Not much here. I like it this way. You get:

bmDORIR.jpg

KPH40 - The main headphone is just the headband, the drivers, and up to the y-split portion of the cable, which terminates into a FEMALE 2.5mm input. This where you'll be buying the optional (and pricey) cables direct from Koss. You can get a Lightning cable, or Type C cable for all your specific needs. If there's one thing I like, it's options. It's simple and easy to understand.

3.5mm utility cord - the add on cable which attaches to the Y-split of the headphone's cable via 2.5mm (balanced?) connector. So you're telling me I can source a balanced 2.5mm cable that terminates into 4.4mm or XLR? This will need verification on my end, as it may just be for microphone purposes. I don't know. We'll see. My biggest gripe with the cable is that it's just too short. I understand that these are very portable friendly, but would it have killed Koss to add at least one more foot? The additional (optional) cables you can purchase are rated at 4ft, but I sincerely doubt the included 3.5mm cable surpasses 3ft. There is no slack. It's like they REALLY want one to buy the optional cables. As an audiophile, if you plan on using your own analog gear, you may need an extension cable of sorts. I'd rather pay someone to mod MMCX connectors instead.

Literature - Not much but the simple manual/booklet that I've long since lost and can't remember it had. Probably the warranty information.

All in all, the goodies are all you need, though I'm a bit saddened they they don't come with a 1/4" adapter. I mean, that was a Koss staple, so not sure why they didn't include one now. Yes, I have a drawer of about 7,000 adapters, but normal consumers getting their first headphone for their new cool mini desktop amplifier will now have to source their own. Ah well. Keep that in mind, if you somehow don't happen to have 1/4" adapters hiding between your cushions.

What's NOT In The Box?

For $20 a pop, Koss sells their Utility Series Lightning Cord Bundle (for Apple products), and the Utility Series USB-C Cord Bundle (for the vastly superior "everything else that ain't Apple" group). I kid guys, I kid.

I should mention, if you plan on buying these later than when bundling it with the KPH40 through the Koss website, they will set you back $45 each instead. More than the cost of the KPH40, which I find....questionable?

Last but not least is a nice Utility Series Hard Case for $15. Oh wait. The Utility Hard Case, made for the Utility series is NOT compatible with the KPH40 Utility. Huh? Koss...just...why? Even if it was bigger, I think you should've made a case that fits ALL of them, not just 2 of 3 Utility headphones. This case lacks... *pause for effect*... UTILITY.

barack-obama-waving.gif




Build and Comfort


Headband:

Let's be real. This is the main reason you want the KPH40. Utility cords? Nah. It's the headband, 100%. And what a nice headband it is. This design was first used in the collaboration between Koss and Retrospekt with the P/21 (though with slightly different looks, as the headband on the P/21 was a brushed, shiny metal, while the KPH40 headband is essentially a matte, metallic grey). I think the P/21 wins out in terms of headband colors and finish, if just slightly. Not a big deal either way. I think they both look great.

The headband is very, very similar in size to the old Parts Express headband everyone knows by now, but with much better design, and without your hair constantly getting caught. The headband is all metal with the exception of the adjustment mechanism's accents and the rear of the portion that the drivers snap on to. It's minimalistic, and retro futuristic. It's beautiful, weightless, and malleable.

I have a huge head, and there's still enough extension here to fit me juuuuust right.

There's no padding to speak of, but when you're essentially wearing nothing, you won't even think about padding or any lack of. It simply disappears on your head. Mind you, I still would much rather detach the KPH40 drivers and attach them to KSC75 clips (which I normally use in this manner), but even for me, there's very little to complain about here with the headband. It's nearly perfect.

I DO have to mention one thing: One of the black circle covers of the headband popped off as I was trying to re-attach the drivers back on. It seems the glue that holds it in place detached from the main headband portion and stuck to the black plastic circle. Unfortunately, once that happens, there is no way to attach the black plastic back onto the headband without removing all the glue (trust me, I tried), so you'll need to crazy glue the black plastic's outer rim (on the inside) back onto the metal headband in order for stay firmly in place.

4QL8LsM.jpg

This won't really matter to you guys that don't plan on detaching the drivers to use with clips, but if you do, just be mindful and try to hold the black plastic portion in place while snapping the drivers on or off. It's no big deal to me as I planned to use the KPH40 with KSC75 clips, but just be mindful you can damage the headband, and it's not a simple process to pop the black plastic back into place. Say that 4 times fast.


Cups/Drivers:

Can you even call the Koss 60-ohm driver housings cups? I think it's universally agreed that Koss basically just has drivers that happen to attach to clips or headbands. No cups. If you want to be technical, sure, the housing is where the pads and rear plastic cover attaches to, but tomatoe, tomatoh. If you ask me, it's just drivers on clips.

I need to mention the KPH40's housing is different from the older housing on the KSC35, PortaPro, and SportaPro. It's minute, but the design HAS changed. I didn't even realize it at first!

6HV5Qs4.jpg

On the left is the KPH40. On the right is either my MMCX modded KSC35 Wireless, or MMCX modded PortaPro Black editions. It doesn't matter which it actually is (they're identical in sound and looks). Notice the lack of segmentation walls between the holes. This is the big indicator that Koss has finally started to update their designs. The question now is whether this new outer design will be shared with other models in the future, or if it's relegated to the Utility series. I say this, because it does appear that the PortaPro Utility also uses the newer design. Unsure if the non-Utility 60-ohm driver models will retain the old cup design or move on to the new ones. This also pertains to sound, which I'll mention later.


Ear Pads:

These pads still feel the same as it's always been on the 35, Porta, Sporta driver variants. Note that the KSC75 uses a scratchier, less pleasant feeling pad than the others. I'd say that the edges are less rounded on the KPH40 pads compared to the others, but it may just be because these are newer, and aren't a change that should affect the sonic attributes.

I may be sentenced to death for this, but I'm not one of those Yaxi pad enthusiasts. I didn't like how they affected the sound on the older drivers, and they're also less comfortable when using clips (don't @ me). They MAY be worthwhile checking into for the KPH40 if you plan on using its headband. I'm not. Your mileage may vary. I think the stock pads are perfect with clips and sounds fantastic, so no Yaxi pads for me.


Cables:

Unfortunately, the KPH40 STILL doesn't have detachable cables where it counts (the area prone to always, always going bad on Koss 60-ohm driver models: the complete and utter lack of strain relief where the cables attach to the drivers. Every single Koss headphone I've bought (including the KSC35 Wireless and PortaPro wireless,) has gone bad at the same exact spot on the cables (update: It has also gone bad on this KPH40 just 2 1/2 weeks after the review posted). I don't see this changing even with the KPH40. It's an eventuality. I don't mistreat my headphones either. I don't ever hold my headphones from the cable, knowing full well that's an easy way to kill these. And yet, it still happens.

On the positive side, I like that the new cable is flat. That's nice.

Now, what are my grievances with the cable, aside from its eventual death? I think the Y split could've been made about 4-6 inches further down. I also think the Y split could have a small dot or other indicator to connect the utility cords symmetrically, as the 'barrel' isn't perfectly cylindrical. It's not a big deal, but those with OCD may be irked by it. There are very faint plastic molding lines on the side that can help guide you, but they're practically invisible.

Now the big issue with the cable is something I previously mentioned: It's simply too short. The Utility cord is about 3 feet (by guesstimation). 1 foot added by the cable portion attached to the KPH40 itself. That leaves you with so little slack, any movements will likely tug at the cable and add strain to the already questionable connection between the driver and the cables. 4 feet? Come on Koss, I understand you intend the KPH40 to be for portable use, but no headphone should have anything less than 5 feet of cable length, personally. Tucking in a foot of this cable into a pants pocket where your or DAP is is no major biggie. Having so little cable, however, is.

For a model that's focused on cable swapping, if the other options are this short... there's gonna have to be another redesign. I literally can't lean back on my computer chair without the cable wanting to snap off from the amp on my desk which is within arm's length.

At the ends of the cable are the plugs: a 2.5mm plug which may or may not be balanced or carries a mic channel. I'll need verification. On the other end is a 3.5mm TRS connection. There's an error on the website's image that shows TRRS instead. Not sure why. Perhaps the stock cable was meant to have an inline mic, but may have been changed before release. As stated earlier, there's no 1/4" snap off adapter included, so you'll have to source your own. If these aren't your first pair of headphones, you likely have some laying around. This is another sign that makes Koss seem like they really don't want you to use these at home on desktop gear for some reason. I wholeheartedly believe most of us will want an extension cable of some kind.


Weight and Clamp:

The KPH40 is literally two drivers strapped to a very thin piece of lightweight metal that I'd say barely qualifies as a headband. As such, the KPH40 may as well weigh absolutely nothing because that's how it feels when worn. You really can't get any better than weightless. It's one of the reasons I'm such a diehard fan of the clip on Koss models. It's like wearing nothing, and the KPH40 continues that trend, headband or not.

Clamp is probably the only minor quibble I have with the comfort at least when it comes to the headband. Now, I need to stress this: The KPH40 does not really have a clamp by traditional means. You're essentially just getting two drivers that are gently being pressed towards the ears by the headband. If you've ever used on ear headphones before, you will think the comfort is essentially 9.9 out of 10. I'm not most people. I've become used to clip-ons where instead of pressing in towards the ears, the drivers essentially rest near the ears. The only potential discomfort there would be how you feel about the clips hanging on to your ears. For me, this is MUCH more comfortable than any headphone in existence, especially with the KSC75 clips. One can complain about the KSC35 clips being a bit sharp where it rests on the ears, but even that is more comfortable than practically any headband (including the KPH40 headband), personally-speaking. Still, as most people aren't going to switch from the headband, you can rest easy. The headband is fantastic.


Final Build and Comfort Impressions:

One should come to expect some things with the venerable 60-ohm Koss products.

1. The cable will go bad. It's just a fact of life by this point. (update: DID GO BAD, and fail on the right side)
2. They headphones weigh nothing (even the chonky SportaPro headband weighs nothing)
3. Due to how insubstantial they feel to the touch, they won't inspire confidence in terms of durability. However, outside of the cable, they can last forever, aside from potential driver rattle.

So really, I am and will always be happy with Koss build here, outside of the cables. Did I mention cable durability is questionable? No? Well, let me tell you that the cables will likely go bad. Don't say I didn't warn you. Yes, it's a new design for the cable, and yes they're flat, and break away past the split which is new and different, but connection strength between the cable and the drivers is, and has always been a Koss problem. I don't see this changing. Nothing has happened yet at the time of review, but I'm not holding my breath.

Comfort-wise, the KPH40 is excellent with the new headband or replaced with any of the other mounts. PortaPro headband, SportaPro headband, Parts Express headband, KSC35 clips, or KSC75 clips, they're all what I'd consider going from quite comfortable to incredibly comfortable. Some people don't find clips to be comfortable, but I'd call these people dead wrong. Yeah, I said it.

In short, the KPH40 as it comes out of the box may as well be 8.5/10 personally, and I'm sure most others will say it's 9/10 or higher, until they yank the cable (and trust me, it will happen).



Noise Control

The KPH40 is fully open. They leak in sounds from the outside world about as badly as if you wore no headphones at all. To be honest, that's actually a selling point for me, as I'm likely to wear these when I'm out and about, and the last thing I want to do is lose situational awareness. I honestly don't know how people can walk around with IEMs and other high noise isolation headphones. Aren't you afraid of literally anything in the world surprising you? That randomly speeding car that is paying more attention to his phone than the death machine they're in control of. That mugger coming up behind you. That rabid dog making a beeline straight towards you, fully intent on taking a chunk out of your behind. Really, I think IEMs in public are absolutely illogical and unsafe. So thank you Koss, for letting me stay aware of my surroundings.

As far as noise leakage out, the KPH40 leaks out as if you didn't even have them on, but really, small dynamic drivers don't tend to project very far past one room, let alone enough to really disturb anyone past 10-15 feet of you. If you close the door in the room you're in, you may as well be wearing closed headphones. You're not going to bother anyone with the KPH40. I probably wouldn't blast them at max volume in a library when sitting next to someone closer than 6 feet away, but for all other real world scenarios, I think people overestimate how much non-planar headphones leak. Compare a KPH40 to something like an Audeze LCD-2, and then tell me what noise leakage actually sounds like.



Sound

Disclaimer: My frequency tests are purely by ear through frequency tests. If you want objective, you won't find it here. This is my review, and how I personally feel about what I'm hearing. Just needed to reinforce this. My hearing perception may not match data measurements or your own perception.

Warning: The PortaPro Utility has also received an update in its rear housing design. Does it stop there, or did Koss ALSO use whatever drivers are in the KPH40 with the PortaPro utility? That's a question someone else will have to answer. For now, I'm under the assumption that the KPH40 and PortaPro sound different, simply because all the PortaPros I have owned all sounded like all my previous KSC35 and SportaPros. There is a distinction of those units being darker and more bass prominent than the KPH40 I have. IF Koss updated the PortaPro Utility to use the same drivers as the KPH40, then the tonal balance has shifted a bit towards more neutral, and not AS bass-centric and laid back. Perhaps in the future I'll try out the PortaPro utility to confirm whether they retain the old sound, or have changed. So just a word of warning. Any comparisons I make are with the KPH40 and OLDER PortaPros and its brethren. I know nothing of the new PortaPro Utility sound.

I highly doubt Koss will give anyone a solid, firm answer on whether they use the same drivers or not. So I leave it for others to measure the KPH40 and PortaPro Utility (on the same headband/mounts for proper 1:1 comparison). Though it may be the PortaPro utility still has the old sound which (to me) is obviously different. Time will tell.


Ok, with that out of the way... how does the KPH40 sound? Putting it simply? Glorious. Koss has run this particular game for 30+ years now, and it'd be insane to think they'd fumble from the winning formula they garnered with the PortaPro. It's a little less leaning towards the bombastic PortaPro sound, but it's still very much in the family.


Bass:

The KPH40's bass can be heard as low as 25hz or so, but not much in terms of rumble and omnipotence. The KPH40 has an enjoyable and punchy mid bass with relatively quick decay next to the slower, fuller, more looseness found on the PortaPro and others. It's a nice balance without being bass heavy or lacking. Subjectively it seems to level out at 55hz and up. Very good presence towards lower midrange. Exceptionally volume matched. Outside of utter bassheads (which would do better with a SportaPro/PortaPro/KSC35) I doubt many people will complain about the bass representation on the KPH40. It's solid and well controlled. Something that puts headphones costing much higher to shame.

I personally prefer the darker, fuller sound of the more bass driven Porta/Sporta/35s for my bass needs, but if you're someone who wants a bit more control without verging on being 'lean', the KPH40 is the superior option, without question. It still presents bass really well, enough to do bassy genres justice. I have no complaints here. It still thumps and will make you want to dance.


Midrange to Treble:

Clean, well maintained presence, though a considerable dip just past 4.2khz. Most prominence between 5-6khz, with a dip at 8khz, and good, controlled treble from 9k-14k presence. The peakiness at 5-6k is the only area that I feel could be flattened/contained a bit, though it's really only a noticeable flaw in frequency tests, and doesn't come up as a problem during normal, varied listening. It does add to upper range brightness which can be heard in normal listening.

As I was accustomed to the older variants, the KPH40 does come across as a more refined, better balanced headphone. The midrange and treble presentation are just outright better in practically all aspects next to the older models. It sounds cleaner, clearer, and more vibrant, without stepping into zesty, fatiguing sound. Ultimately, again, I prefer a more laid back sound, but I think the vast majority of people will agree that the KPH40's midrange to treble presentation is a step above its predecessors.


Soundstage and Imaging:

This is an area I will never feel comfortable giving too many thoughts on, as I've never been too worried about soundstaging and imaging presentation of stereo/2ch sources. I mainly care if there is separation and a sense of space between notes and sonic objects, and the KPH40 does not disappoint there. With some music, it can even sound out of my head, which is all I need to be content with a headphone's soundstaging performance.

I would not expect magic with Koss drivers in terms of staging, but these do quite well. As the sound is quite open, there is no wall to stop the sound from extending into the room you're sitting in. It's not going to match the better open over ear headphones, but it can certain reach a size bigger than a lot of closed-back headphones. There's nothing overly intimate about its staging. I'd consider it medium in size overall. That's perfectly adequate for me, which in my book is an utter success.


Sound Signature and Clarity:

The KPH40 surpasses all other Koss variants with a very fleshed out, balanced sound without leaning too far in one direction. It still retains plenty of that Koss warmth and easy to listen nature of its peers, but it does have some sparkle and vibrancy that the PortaPros and its ilk lacked. In comparison, the others are boomy, looser sounding, with a lack of restraint. While I do find their qualities enjoyable, I do know it's of a lesser quality than the cleaner, higher fidelity sounding coming off the KPH40. It's just....better.

Depending on range, some may believe it can be bright, and some will believe it's laid back. I'd say it's a slightly lower than neutral color tonality and forwardness, but the lower treble peaks adds some bite that keeps the KPH40 from sounding overly relaxed. I can see amplification coloration making some difference to this, despite the KPH40 not needing any real amplification.

Where some find the KSC35, Portapros/Sportapros too warm, too bassy, or too smooth, the KPH40 exudes a better level of clarity and definition. Where some find the KSC75 too dry, bright or thin, the KPH40 offer a meatier, more grounded sound. The KPH40 is a solid middle ground between the others, being the bridge between their strengths, while eschewing their biggest weaknesses. The KPH40 is the true evolution of the Koss sound. Now that it exists, there's very little reason to go for the other models unless you specifically want to lean into their more extreme tonal balances.


Amplification

The KPH40 can be driven by the electric output of a potato. Meaning, there's no real reason to even think twice about any amplifier you'd even consider using for the KPH40 (unless it's some OTL tube amp meant to be used for high impedance loads). If your source outputs essentially anything, the KPH40 will have more than enough supplied power. I'd worry more about the power being clean and noise-free. That's it. So if you're someone that doesn't want to utilize an external amp, then by all means, the KPH40 is for you. The old PortaPros were meant to be played by portable cassette players. Those were not powerful machines. Even at 60ohm (which some of you probably thought that sounded high next to typical 32ohm headphones), the KPH40 is very efficient. This makes the KPH40 a perfect companion. Seriously, if you have a main headphone, the KPH40 will always be a lovely secondary or tertiary headphone in part due to the effortlessness and versatility on what it sounds good off without any real power requirements.



Gaming

I always had a great time with the KSC75, KSC35, Porta and Sportas, and this does not change with the KPH40. One could make the argument that the non-titanium coated Koss drivers are a bit darker and too bass focused for competitive, or serious gaming. They make great cases for fun, casual gaming, where single player, action heavy, atmospheric-driven games. They may lack in subtle nuances for the new cream of the crop online multiplayer games.

The KPH40 makes its case as a budget option that can work relatively well for those genres than the others lacked in. Now, the KPH40 isn't a complete turnaround from what made those drivers special and so beloved. It's simply more mature and articulate sounding, so details will be easier to pick out, allowing you to focus more on getting Ws.

In terms of virtual surround, I've always found all the earlier Koss drivers to sound fantastic and viable for proper surround emulation. The KPH40 doesn't change my mind. It works, and it works well. Give them a try with Dolby Headphone, Redscape Audio, Creative's SBX, SXFI, etc. They will perform admirably. They're not the BEST at rear depth like the higher level, full-sized headphones, but they works well enough where I don't feel the need to swap out for the high end.

Gaming with headphones is more than just pure sound quality. Long-session comfort in both the physical and aural sense is just as important, and that's one big area where the KPH40 triumphs. You can simply wear it all day and night with no fatigue on the neck or ear drums. The only area that may be a bit sore after a long session is the outer ears being a bit worn out from having them pressing in all day, but with some clips, this is also something that can be mitigated.

There simply isn't much in gaming I wouldn't grab the KPH40 for.



Personal Recommendations

Media:

The KPH40 is a great, well balanced headphone that goes well with practically anything. Yes, it may not be the ideal, critical listening headphone, but for those with realistic expectations, you'll find the KPH40 to just achieve greatness, and perform above and beyond with everything you throw at it. Games? Check. Action films? Check. Jazz? Check. Classical? Check. LoFi? Check. Really, it does not disappoint (within realistic expectations). If you're an shameless basshead, you may perhaps opt for the Koss Porta/Sporta/35 models instead. Even then, the KPH40 has plenty of bass bite, so I'm speaking of the 10% that will want more.


Practicality:

Are the KPH40 practical? The KPH40 may not be as portable as the KSC35 or KSC75, but it's something you can easily wear around the neck, or toss in a bag, and have zero worries about the disintegrating. They are a perfect portable solution. I love that they're fully open so you can stay aware of your surroundings. They weigh nothing. They're easy to power by anything, and they sound great on the go, or at home. It is truly a do it all headphone. The better question is why wouldn't you use the KPH40 for essentially every need? The only thing I'd probably not use a KPH40 for is air travel or on subways. Hey Koss, make some true closed-back versions, at the very least, for these kinds of environments! Not sure how, and they'd likely use some god-awful pleather pads that would ruin comfort, but I'd like to see them try.


Who Is It For?

Let me be clear. The KPH40 is for everyone. If you have $40, get the KPH40. Oh you own $4000 headphones? I don't care. Get the KPH40. Hell, get the KPH40, and get a KSC75 so you can use its clips for it. Then you can wear the KPH40 while laying down in bed without fear of them sliding off your ears.

The KPH40 is for all of us. I mentioned it earlier, but the KPH40 is a perfect secondary or tertiary headphone, for when you want to use a headphone in places that your main headphones don't fit, like bed, or running, or breakdancing.

The sound will appeal to essentially everyone that isn't a complete nutjob with trash ears. I'm mentioning what should be known as a fact of life. The KPH40 should be in everyone's arsenal. Even your kids. Even your grandparents. Give it to everyone in your family and friend's list. Seriously. Unless they're animals that yank on cables. Don't give those kind of people the KPH40. They don't deserve one.



Likes and Dislikes

Likes:
  • Portability
  • Comfort
  • Headband
  • Looks/Design
  • Weight
  • Well balanced and lively + simply amazing sound
  • Performance to price ratio/insane value
  • Efficient
  • Great for gaming for all genres, systems, etc.

Dislikes:
  • Some peakiness between 5-6khz
  • Still no detachable cables where it counts (at the driver)
  • Frustratingly short stock cable (yanks will ensue)
  • The continued lack of strain relief, which will (update: ALREADY DID) undoubtedly lead to cable failure at some point. Koss, fix this, and fix it ASAP. FIX. IT.
  • Expensive optional cables that cost more than the actual headphone. (Pay someone to mod MMCX connectors instead, seriously)
  • Did I mention that I don't trust the connection between the cable and the drivers?


Final Impressions

The KPH40 sound is exceptionally high quality at its price tier, with little to nothing being able to rival them without the cost of losing the musicality and toe-tapping engagement they bring. Sure, you can save up 40-ish dollars more for a Grado 60 series, but those are a fair bit more unwieldy, and lose the practicality. They're also far, FAR less comfortable. They may be on ear, but they may as well be full sized headphones. So really, I wouldn't put them in the same category as the KPH40.

The KPH40 certainly performs favorably all the way up to around $100, but I think the $100+ tier has some absolute bangers like the K612 Pro, and X2HR which are next level above. The KPH40 has its place below, and has no direct competition for the best sub-$100, portable open-back. Nothing but Koss offerings, all inferior to the KPH40 in general. They stand alone. You'd ask about the SHP9500 which I unfortunately haven't heard. Maybe those can give them a run for their money. I can't say. I CAN say that I bought the SHP9600, and....the less I say about it, the better. I was NOT a fan. I thought I heard muffled before. I was wrong. I digress.

I love all my Koss 'driver on a headband/clip' headphones. I will never live without one. I have a problem in that Koss has supplied a product that I can't live without. The KPH40 is the new formula that is simply better than the past iterations. Yes, the cable is too short and (likely) will break (as it already has on mine 2 weeks after review), but that's what their lifetime warranty is for, if you're okay with that.

I know I said that I prefer the darker, smoother sound on the other past models (with the exception of the KSC75 which is inferior in all respects, although still fantastic on its own). However, I can't deny that the KPH40 is simply the best model overall. No question about it. For 99% of you, there is a new top choice. Throw away all your KPH30i, Sportapro, and Portapros and anything remotely near this price range. There is a new king of the budget tier. KPH40, I kneel to you.

QAkgDmr.jpg
 
Last edited:
Jan 10, 2022 at 11:29 AM Post #47,668 of 48,677
Copy my text and save it to a .txt file. In EQ APO, on the config.txt tab, add an Control...Include, and load the txt file there. If you hit the up arrow icon, it will open the file in another tab and you can edit the settings there.

As for the DT-990 and DT-1990, I owned the DT-990 Pro, and own the DT-1990, and my M1570 is my upgrade for the DT-1990.


Yes. The M570 isn't as spacious as either the M1070 or the M1570. The M1570 is the fuller sounding of the two, tho if only for gaming the M1070 will do great. They've been on sale for $219 recently in the summer (I paid $239). Last sale they were $299. If M1570 is $399, and M1070 is $299, then consider the M1570. If the M1070 is $219, then get that. (I own both, I got the M1070 first, then a few months later the M1570 to satisfy my curiosity. I kept the M1570, and with my EQ settings and tubes, the sound quality went to the next level, and are entry-level summit-fi quality. I thought the Dt-1990 had nice imaging, but these are another level, as I can close my eyes and picture the sound room where the music is recorded, and the vocals are VERY natural sounding, and can be very intimate as well.)
Thanks, I'll give that method a try. By the way, my assumption would be that given I feel like changes in EQ settings can negate this slight muddy-ness that the issue is not my DAC/amp and that swapping it out is not going to make a difference here. Would that be a fair assumption? Or should I expect that the headphones I'm using should sound excellent without the application of any EQ?
 
Jan 10, 2022 at 12:09 PM Post #47,669 of 48,677
Thanks, I'll give that method a try. By the way, my assumption would be that given I feel like changes in EQ settings can negate this slight muddy-ness that the issue is not my DAC/amp and that swapping it out is not going to make a difference here. Would that be a fair assumption? Or should I expect that the headphones I'm using should sound excellent without the application of any EQ?
No headphone is perfect, as our bodies are unique, and brains are trained to prefer different sonic signatures. Your Atom DAC doesn't have filters does it? If it did, you can tune your DAC to your hardware and ears. Otherwise, for bass mud, you adjust the mid-bass region. Changing DACs may improve things if there's an issue with your current one. I was using a Creative G6 as a DAC for awhile, then switched to the SMSL M300 MKII. THAT was a big difference, since I discovered that the analog stage of the G6 was rolling off low freqs, and overall the sound was grainy in comparison to the M300, which uses AKM's flagship AK4497, and a better designed analog stage. The M300 also has filters, so I was able to select which sounded most natural to me.
 
Jan 10, 2022 at 12:20 PM Post #47,670 of 48,677
No headphone is perfect, as our bodies are unique, and brains are trained to prefer different sonic signatures. Your Atom DAC doesn't have filters does it? If it did, you can tune your DAC to your hardware and ears. Otherwise, for bass mud, you adjust the mid-bass region. Changing DACs may improve things if there's an issue with your current one. I was using a Creative G6 as a DAC for awhile, then switched to the SMSL M300 MKII. THAT was a big difference, since I discovered that the analog stage of the G6 was rolling off low freqs, and overall the sound was grainy in comparison to the M300, which uses AKM's flagship AK4497, and a better designed analog stage. The M300 also has filters, so I was able to select which sounded most natural to me.
Right now I have a Sound Blaster X4 that's doing DAC and amp duties. It certainly has some functionality that adjust sound for things like gaming/movies/music/etc. as well as EQ and other sound processing options. But I've taken care to turn all that off with the exception of virtual 7.1; I've also taken care to disable processing on the Windows side as well. I happen to have an integrated PC sound card with an amplifier (Sound Blaster Z SE) so I'll try connecting my headphones direct there to see if there's a considerable difference to the sound without an EQ applied. To be clear - once I apply some EQ all of the headphones I'm trying sound great, so it's not a situation where I can't get anything up to a point where I'm happy with it.

My ultimate concern is with establishing a proper point of reference for "how it should sound" by which I can judge my experiences in testing my gear. In a perfect world I could drop by someone's house or go to a store where their setup captures the essential qualities of some of these headphones and I could hear what they're hearing so I have that point of reference. I do fully appreciate that "how it should sound" involves some measure of personal preference/personal experience but I also assume there's an equal measure of objectivity in there as well.

Maybe I'm overthinking all of this and I'd greatly appreciate that feedback if so. I absolutely want to keep in perspective that, at the end of the day, the most important question to answer is "Which pair of headphones do I have the most fun with?" But ultimately the reason for my caution is that I'm spending a considerable amount of money and effort in this endeavor and thus I want to be sure I'm not missing out on anything.
 
Last edited:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top