isquirrel
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Dec 29, 2012
- Posts
- 1,739
- Likes
- 574
I will go on to say the that when I sat down and did the math on the inevitable upgrade cycle, having to sell gear at at a loss and then the knowledge that I was buying something that I knew I would upgrade at some time did not make economic or sane reasoning to me.
This is no better explanation of this than a quote from Chris Sommovigo in this review of the 234's http://thehighfidelityreport.com/dream-machine/
"One of the questions that invariably arises in explorations of price and value is the one that asks how much money the end-user will eventually lose over a lifetime of constant upgrading and trading-in, etc. If we’re frank with ourselves, the sum can oftentimes get scary. The secondary market has become the primary market, it seems, with the neurotic masses looking to minimize their risks by purchasing used gear at less-than 50% original retail. Risks of what? They already know, ahead of time, that they’re going to sell the thing that they’re about to buy. And so, the abusive cycle of constant “upgrading” takes hold (that, in itself, is a psychological oddity to me, this idea of being pre-dissatisfied, but that’s a subject for another discussion). Over the years, a serious amount of money is invariably lost in this crazy merry-go-round. Woo’s products in general aren’t fit for that kind of trade-around (you hardly find them for sale on the second-hand market), and this is especially true of the 234 mono blocs."
Tony has raised an a very good point, if I do the math on the valves (all of them) and the possible future valve upgrades then for sure you could spend a great deal on an SS amp and still be better off. Will it have that tube sound that I personally prefer - no - will it empty my wallet - yes.
Its our personal choices that we make on this journey that define the outcome we are ultimately in a quest for and that's a very personal matter. Thank goodness we don't all like the same thing - life would be very boring indeed!
This is no better explanation of this than a quote from Chris Sommovigo in this review of the 234's http://thehighfidelityreport.com/dream-machine/
"One of the questions that invariably arises in explorations of price and value is the one that asks how much money the end-user will eventually lose over a lifetime of constant upgrading and trading-in, etc. If we’re frank with ourselves, the sum can oftentimes get scary. The secondary market has become the primary market, it seems, with the neurotic masses looking to minimize their risks by purchasing used gear at less-than 50% original retail. Risks of what? They already know, ahead of time, that they’re going to sell the thing that they’re about to buy. And so, the abusive cycle of constant “upgrading” takes hold (that, in itself, is a psychological oddity to me, this idea of being pre-dissatisfied, but that’s a subject for another discussion). Over the years, a serious amount of money is invariably lost in this crazy merry-go-round. Woo’s products in general aren’t fit for that kind of trade-around (you hardly find them for sale on the second-hand market), and this is especially true of the 234 mono blocs."
Tony has raised an a very good point, if I do the math on the valves (all of them) and the possible future valve upgrades then for sure you could spend a great deal on an SS amp and still be better off. Will it have that tube sound that I personally prefer - no - will it empty my wallet - yes.
Its our personal choices that we make on this journey that define the outcome we are ultimately in a quest for and that's a very personal matter. Thank goodness we don't all like the same thing - life would be very boring indeed!