OracleGuy
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Sep 17, 2004
- Posts
- 255
- Likes
- 0
Quote:
Thanks for the tips! With all the positive comments about the TF, I'm really quite anxious for them to show up. I was initially put off by the size of these IEMs, but as long as they're comfortable I won't mind. SQ is more important, and they seem to have the edge in "balanced" sound signature over the Shures, according to a number of comments I've read.
Has anybody tried the included "Sound level attenuator"? I'm wondering if that would be useful with an amp like the Gilmore, i.e., one that's set up more for high-impedance cans.
Originally Posted by steviebee /img/forum/go_quote.gif Welcome to IEM land! When they arrive spend some time getting comfortable with the fit, try the flip mod (easily reversible, just take care when you initially tease out the cables), different tips etc. They are big for IEMs but still very comfortable I find, tho it took me awhile experimenting with foams, olives etc. I don't get on w/ flanges sadly, so I ruled them out quickly. YMMV of course I've used mine with a SuperMicro IV and RSA Hornet -both have been good in delivering that nice deep but clear sound, with a good wide soundstage and balance. TF10 is great w/out an amp, but I usually prefer to go loaded... |
Thanks for the tips! With all the positive comments about the TF, I'm really quite anxious for them to show up. I was initially put off by the size of these IEMs, but as long as they're comfortable I won't mind. SQ is more important, and they seem to have the edge in "balanced" sound signature over the Shures, according to a number of comments I've read.
Has anybody tried the included "Sound level attenuator"? I'm wondering if that would be useful with an amp like the Gilmore, i.e., one that's set up more for high-impedance cans.