donunus
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Nov 12, 2004
- Posts
- 9,238
- Likes
- 157
I did some listening of the 2050 system and the hd600. The thing I can say about the stax is that it doesn't sound like its trying to do anything special. Its just playing music effortlessly and if I only had this and nothing else I would be absolutely happy. The hd600 however, shows more acrobatics with demo stuff that impresses me but when it comes to just playing anything out of my library, it is more picky than the stax. The stax is revealing yet doesnt force you in analytical mode. The senns although having a smooth, creamy sound tends to be more analytical than the stax IMO. I would say these cans are more on par with each other than comparing the hd600s to other dynamics Ive heard though. The hd600s are great and might impress more when played loud on a powerful amp during meets but theres something about the stax from my 1 day of having it that seems like it does my music right. Only time will tell now. I can see where people will want to go to the O2 to get the hd600 acrobatics and the stax effortlessness and transparency but to me that is the beauty of this basic stax, It doesnt make me crave for the technicalities because it makes me enjoy my music. I know I am still in the honeymoon period with these so take my comments with a grain of salt. I just wanted to share my stax experience for those that haven't heard them yet.
Edit: quick swapping these two cans reveals the mids of the stax to be a little more colored and prominent compared to the hd600 but less than my former ad2000. Its more like the grado sr60 without the harshness in mids balance. Midbass of the hd600 is a little more than the stax which gives it the impression of tightness for some music. Upper bass is more balanced with the overall sound on the stax making the music more defined in its rhythm but it is not nearly as pronounced in the upper bass as the ultra tight sounding ad2000s (from memory) which stuck out like a sore thumb with those cans. The treble of the senns are more forward than the stax but the upper mids are more laid back on the senns... Those are my findings so far
Also remember that the stax has almost no burn in yet.
Anyone with experience with the 202 specifically? Do they change dramatically with burn in?
Edit: quick swapping these two cans reveals the mids of the stax to be a little more colored and prominent compared to the hd600 but less than my former ad2000. Its more like the grado sr60 without the harshness in mids balance. Midbass of the hd600 is a little more than the stax which gives it the impression of tightness for some music. Upper bass is more balanced with the overall sound on the stax making the music more defined in its rhythm but it is not nearly as pronounced in the upper bass as the ultra tight sounding ad2000s (from memory) which stuck out like a sore thumb with those cans. The treble of the senns are more forward than the stax but the upper mids are more laid back on the senns... Those are my findings so far
Anyone with experience with the 202 specifically? Do they change dramatically with burn in?