FastGecko5
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Oct 4, 2013
- Posts
- 254
- Likes
- 1,500
KZ Castor - Harman or Bass Improved? Anyone have both?
i have both for awhile,KZ Castor - Harman or Bass Improved? Anyone have both?
Trying to get a handle on the staging of Davinci - does it have that speaker like presentation where most of the music is happening inside and/or contained slightly in front of your head, or does it have that immersive wrap-around-your-head effect that only gets more pronounced with volume?Sorry I haven't heard the Hype 4 but I have the DaVinci and the bass will definitely satisfy your basshead needs. It's not overtly bassy but it's very tasteful and voluptuous.
Hello there,Looks very very nice, thanks! Your thoughts vs Explorer?
Just reading about the tech and the pics got me hyped. Lotto play!! LOLYeah gadget has been on about it hyping ever since!
It's from here:
https://eminentears.com/ruby/
Over 2k, pricing iirc.
I want a equally or upgraded tuning with a ST9 (piezo??)!!KZ vs TRN competition, especially ZS10Pro segment is a gift that keep giving.
previously with KZ ZS10Pro vs TRN V90, later with KZ ZS10Pro X and TRN ST5, and now KZ ZS10Pro2 with TRN ST7
I think TRN is trying to one up KZ in driver count and undercut the price with TRN ST7.
Thankfully the tuning also works very well.
Thanks!Here we go my FRC partisans, we finally have our first direct comparison of the Explorer and the DaVinci from one reviewer with one and the same technical measurement setup. This should give us now a better reliability of the curves (as always 60 dB @ 500 Hz):
In this context, big thanks @atechreviews, good job!
More impressions to come, but the Delci is better.At that price, they are taking straight aim at the Delci and EA500LM.
i keep hearing good thing about delci,More impressions to come, but the Delci is better.
Wow great comparison, thanks a lot!! Seems like both are great choices in their respective price point. So many great sets coming out now. Exciting times indeed!Hello there,
I A/B tested the AFUL Explorer and DUNU DaVinci for 30 minutes. Here’s what I found:
Bass
Both IEMs offer similar bass quantity, but the quality differs significantly. The Explorer's bass is excellent with a satisfying rumble, resembling high-quality 2-channel speakers with precise, clean bass. Enjoyable and honestly lacks nothing. You enjoy the bass as well as the vocals and instruments. The DaVinci, on the other hand, provides more texture, a more powerful slam, more separation, punch, and impact. It delivers a tactile experience, making bass-heavy tracks feel more tactile and in-your-face. It’s like adding a subwoofer to those 2-channel speakers, drawing attention to the clean, impactful bass in every song. I can feel the bass of the DaVinci in most songs with bass guitars (clean and separated) and bass heavy hip hop and EDM tracks. I found myself raising the volume (for a second or two) more when listening to the DaVinci because of the bass, same way you raise the volume to hear more of that enjoyable subwoofer bass. (Please use moderate volume to protect your hearing)
Upper Mids
The DaVinci presents more forward upper mids, enhancing instruments like cellos, violins, and higher-pitched vocals. While the Explorer offers balanced and clear vocals, the DaVinci makes them slightly more forward and pronounced. The Explorer compensates with an intimate, close-to-ear vocal presentation, making the difference less pronounced unless directly compared.
Treble
The DaVinci has more treble extension, offering more forward and defined cymbals and synths. On the Explorer, these elements sound clear and balanced without being fatiguing. A/B testing revealed that the DaVinci brings synths, and cymbal strikes closer to the ear, providing more definition and clarity.
Soundstage
The DaVinci has a wider soundstage with good sense of depth, while the Explorer has a more intimate presentation. Both are enjoyable in their own ways.
Resolution
Overall, the DaVinci offers higher resolution due to its forward upper mids and better treble extension. It provides greater clarity and instrument separation, making individual guitar strings and vocals more pronounced. The bass also has more detail and separation. Other than the bass, this is the other aspect that is easily audible to me when comparing them. More clarity, resolution, and instrument separation on the DaVinci.
Comparing the AFUL Explorer side by side with the DaVinci was revealing. Here are some key takeaways:
We live in an exciting time for audiophiles. Brands like DUNU, AFUL, and many others are constantly pushing boundaries, and we’re the ones benefiting from their innovations.
- I spent more time than usual on this comparison, highlighting the Explorer's impressive performance.
- The Explorer offers incredible value, especially considering it’s being compared to the more expensive DaVinci with twice the number of drivers.
- In my opinion, owning both isn’t necessary since the DaVinci is an upgrade to the Explorer.
I keep forgetting about the Libra. SOAB!! LOLImagine KZ has a waifu sound
The balanced version of Libra is more like an ungraded version of EW200 with better clarity, soundstage and bass to me, rather than the Aria 2. Btw, wish you are the lucky one to win a free iem.
I have both. It's your personal preferences that decides which one to choose. If you're a basshead go for Castor Bass. If you like a cleaner, more "audiophile" sound go for Castor Silver.KZ Castor - Harman or Bass Improved? Anyone have both?