Why not iBasso DX160 and Shanling M6 Pro?
The discovery thread!
- Thread starter Dsnuts
- Start date
-
- Tags
- blon bl03 db3 ibasso am05 isn d02 isn h40 jq audio jvc-ha-fx101 jvc-ha-fx40-b-earphone-kv6902 nx7 nx7 pro philips-she3580-28-in-ear-headphones philips-she9700 pioneer-dje-1500-k-professional-dj-in-ear-headphones sony-mh1-livesound-hi-fi-stereo-in-ear-headphones sphere thermaltake-in-ear-headset tri i3 vsonic-vc1000
All In!!!
I don't want the ibasso and the deal I am getting is for the m6 or hiby r6 pro not the m6 pro
Attachments
It's not a fashion show and I don't see that the dx160 does anything better than the m6 and with the offered price it's a no brainer. Thanks but I'm good.
cappuchino
Previously known as sub30
-deleted-
Last edited:
Xinlisupreme
Headphoneus Supremus
@CamWuu take M6 pro, pairs well with Volt
Also R6 2020 looks fine but R6 Pro suffer hiss with some sensitive IEMs
Are you Italian?
Last edited:
The post literally says "the deal is for the m6 or the r6 pro not the m6 pro"@CamWuu take M6 pro, pairs well with Volt
Also R6 2020 looks fine but R6 Pro suffer hiss with some sensitive IEMs
Are you Italian?
So take the ibasso dx160 or hiby r6 2020 forsure?
Last edited:
Deleted@CamWuu take M6 pro, pairs well with Volt
Also R6 2020 looks fine but R6 Pro suffer hiss with some sensitive IEMs
Are you Italian?
Xinlisupreme
Headphoneus Supremus
If you decided for M6, suggestions hasn't sense.
You can read here about M6 and M6 pro, ciao...
https://headfonics.com/shanling-m6-pro-review/2/
Select Comparisons
Shanling M6
Tuning
Head to head the M6 Pro sounds quite different from the M6, with a denser, tighter bass, and a more distinct focused imaging. There is noticeably a lot more power and dynamics, especially when you listen to drums tracks where you can sense a faster attack with more detail.
You will hear a lot more texture in the treble on the M6 Pro while the M6 sounds smoother and more forgiving. The M6 sounds less transparent with reduced air and comparatively showcasing less dynamic range with its more colored “fun” tuning.
The M6 Pro sounds more balanced and natural with a better tonal balance. The control over micro details and texture is superior in both sub-bass and higher treble. The M6 Pro has everything opened up and clearly presented and a good upgrade from on M6’s performance.
Detail
The M6 uses the lower-end AK4495 chipset which is well-beloved by analog-sounding gears lovers. The M6 Pro packs in upgraded dual AK4497EQ which has improved the technical performance and strengthened the resolving power.
The M6 has more of a midrange focus with good vocal weight and presence. Whereas the M6 Pro tries to achieve higher overall clarity enabled by the chipsets and packs in more space and resolution.
It is a good upgrade if you are seeking for more texture and resolving power. However, the M6 may well satisfy listeners who want to have a relaxing listen with a sweeter, smoother, and more intimate vocal delivery.
You can read here about M6 and M6 pro, ciao...
https://headfonics.com/shanling-m6-pro-review/2/
Select Comparisons
Shanling M6
Tuning
Head to head the M6 Pro sounds quite different from the M6, with a denser, tighter bass, and a more distinct focused imaging. There is noticeably a lot more power and dynamics, especially when you listen to drums tracks where you can sense a faster attack with more detail.
You will hear a lot more texture in the treble on the M6 Pro while the M6 sounds smoother and more forgiving. The M6 sounds less transparent with reduced air and comparatively showcasing less dynamic range with its more colored “fun” tuning.
The M6 Pro sounds more balanced and natural with a better tonal balance. The control over micro details and texture is superior in both sub-bass and higher treble. The M6 Pro has everything opened up and clearly presented and a good upgrade from on M6’s performance.
Detail
The M6 uses the lower-end AK4495 chipset which is well-beloved by analog-sounding gears lovers. The M6 Pro packs in upgraded dual AK4497EQ which has improved the technical performance and strengthened the resolving power.
The M6 has more of a midrange focus with good vocal weight and presence. Whereas the M6 Pro tries to achieve higher overall clarity enabled by the chipsets and packs in more space and resolution.
It is a good upgrade if you are seeking for more texture and resolving power. However, the M6 may well satisfy listeners who want to have a relaxing listen with a sweeter, smoother, and more intimate vocal delivery.
Last edited:
I dont know what suggestion hasn't sense means. I was trying to save a buck with the cheaper option but the ibasso dx160 is definitely doable but is it definitely a better match?
Xinlisupreme
Headphoneus Supremus
Take a look at headfonics review, Volt needs a neutral dap, consider also M11 pro, sometimes you can find good deals
Users who are viewing this thread
