I know. What I was saying is that no one had done more than 8.Actually their own ZAX has 8 drivers (1 dd + 7 ba) for 60 usd.
CCA CA16 also has 8 drivers for $45 too.
I know. What I was saying is that no one had done more than 8.Actually their own ZAX has 8 drivers (1 dd + 7 ba) for 60 usd.
oof, missed that. Well they are certainly ramping up their driver count game.I know. What I was saying is that no one had done more than 8.
CCA CA16 also has 8 drivers for $45 too.
True, with one bass BA, it would be hard to imagine that KZ will be pleasing those who criticized AS16.KZ's answer to the VX is the ZAX.
The ASX is what others will be answering to. AFAIK you couldn't get more than 8 drivers under $150 until now, and here's KZ going with 10 drivers for <$90 (from the right place).
Something that worries me about the ASX is that it only has one bass BA whereas most pure BA sets with that many drivers use two. It may not be an issue but they're probably gonna go with a subdued bass, analytical sound.
If you use NiceHCK count, the "double" DD is counted for two, as in NX7They said more than 8. 8 is not more than 8.
That's a coaxial dual dynamic. There are 2 diaphragms. That's not just made up..... Many others use the same coaxial dual dynamic setup and all describe it as 2 drivers (bqeyz BQ3 and others in their lineup for instance).If you use NiceHCK count, the "double" DD is counted for two, as in NX7
I understand the justification for these claims. Those diagrams are not driven independently, right?That's a coaxial dual dynamic. There are 2 diaphragms. That's not just made up..... Many others use the same coaxial dual dynamic setup and all describe it as 2 drivers (bqeyz BQ3 and others in their lineup for instance).
ABM is Active Balanced Membrane. Membrane is magnetic and moved by coil similar to the one in the Balanced Armature driver. The advantage is that large area of the membrane moves uniformly similar to the way diaphragm moves in Planar driver but even better because coil can be massive and induce greater magnetic force, thus producing better dynamics and less distortion. I own M3, Tape & Singer - all using different ABM drivers, and all have better tonality of the treble than BA. (Tuning though, has a lot of room for improvement on all 3)Can you explain what BC and ABM mean? These initials are new to me.
Thank you, that is very interesting, I have learnt something new!ABM is Active Balanced Membrane. Membrane is magnetic and moved by coil similar to the one in the Balanced Armature driver. The advantage is that large area of the membrane moves uniformly similar to the way diaphragm moves in Planar driver but even better because coil can be massive and induce greater magnetic force, thus producing better dynamics and less distortion. I own M3, Tape & Singer - all using different ABM drivers, and all have better tonality of the treble than BA. (Tuning though, has a lot of room for improvement on all 3)
This is from Noble M3 IEM description:
BC stands for Bone Conduction driver
Here is a good source:
https://www.samma3a.com/tech/en/unique-melody-debuts-mest/
"As a summary, MEST bone conduction technology has the following features:
Drivers Configuration (per side):
- No standalone sound tunnels for bone conduction drivers.
- Sound can be heard by touching any parts of the shell.
- Low-Voltage driving bone conduction driver
- Resistant to treble noises
- Low distortion
- Smart fit and easy to be assembled
1x Bone conduction driver to embellish the mid and treble.
2x EST drivers serve ultra-high frequency
2x High BA drivers.
2x Mid-high BA drivers.
1x Dynamic driver serves mid and bass.
FR response:
"
I assume, the core of Bone Conduction driver is also Piezo-Ceramic.
Regarding both the ASX and ASF, they are all-BA IEMs correct? I wonder if they are both sealed, or are either vented? So the ASX will have 10 BAs per side, and the ASF will have 5 BAs per side? If the ASF is neutrally tuned, with good midrange, and is sealed, with great isolation, then the “Pro” moniker would make perfect sense, as it could make for a brilliant stage monitor.A bit weird that they didnt say the ASX is "proffesional" while the cheaper ASF is lol.
yeah, they are both BA only iems. No idea of they are vented or not though.Regarding both the ASX and ASF, they are all-BA IEMs correct? I wonder if they are both sealed, or are either vented? So the ASX will have 10 BAs per side, and the ASF will have 5 BAs per side? If the ASF is neutrally tuned, with good midrange, and is sealed, with great isolation, then the “Pro” moniker would make perfect sense, as it could make for a brilliant stage monitor.
The first thing Google search gives you:Is the long-term effect of bone conduction of high frequencies on ear and brain known?
What is specifically concerning that the intensity of those bone conduction frequencies may not be controlled directly but by the listening preferences at more audible frequencies.
Electrets are used everywhere. Most inline microphones are electret. Some budget stage mics are electret, I believe.Is the charge permanent? Doesn't it dissipate over time?
That does look like a monitoring IEM tuning!yeah, they are both BA only iems. No idea of they are vented or not though.
But they showed this graph for the ASF:
With this description for the ASX:That does look like a monitoring IEM tuning!