Quote:
Ah, somebody with both an 1840 and an MD! A brief comparison?
Two very different headphones - opposites really.
Aside from the cost and fact that one is open and one closed.
Build, fit and comfort - both very solidly built. SRH1840 lighter by quite a large margin - easier to war with glasses too. Actual wearing comfort pretty close - MD has a more comfortable headband, but 1840 has more far more comfortable ear pads. I prefer the 1840 because of the weight difference.
Sound signature - 1840 is flat (but tends to a bright signature), open, airy, bass is very textured, but well extended and linear. Extremely detailed. MD is comparatively very, very dark. It's detailed - and the vocals are good and clear - it's just a far more earthy than airy sound (if that makes sense). MD has more bass presence and texture - less air and sense of space.
Soundstage/imaging - MD has small and intimate stage, but imaging is actually very good. Accurate sense of placement. Vocals / mid-range quite forward. SRH1840 has wider stage (as it should) and is very, very clear. Imaging is extremely good (better than MD).
Tonality - SRH1840 is slightly on the bright side of natural - overall quite flat/balanced though. Lack of mid-bass hump (compared to HD600) is quite pleasant. MD is definitely on the darker side of natural (quite a bit) - and although both are reasonablty 'neutral' cans - IMO the 1840 is closer to natural instrument tone.
My preference (for now) very much for the 1840. I bought the MD to see what the fuss is about. Very different to what I am used to, and will take considerable time to acclimatise. I am hoping to get a listen to the Alpha Dogs at some stage to see if the sound is closer to what I'm after. I'm not sure f the MD will be a keeper for me. And if this is what somewhat like the LCD2 is voiced - at least I'll know that can is not for me.
Sorry for the complete O-T. Please resume normal headphone ranking