So I've had the opportunity to build a few KH-100's (transplanted YH-100's) and I feel I have a little bit of information to glean on everyone given my travels. I believe there are different production runs of the YH-100 drivers, not all are built the same. Let me go through the three variations that I've seen so far, there may be more:
First up is the first variation I ever found. It has matte flux plates, silver ground tab, not very shiny, sort of dull looking. I'd say this is the least technical, yet still sounds very very good.
This is what they measure like, mod list in the title.
Second up is the "shiny" revision. These have a noticeable glean/shine to the flux plates. Also flux plates have Green and Red wavy hue to them at times, obviously some post manufacturing process has been applied. Silver ground tab. I believe these are a later production and sound slightly more technical to me with more bass. (Center pin a bit abused on this driver because the left driver diaphragm had a crease in it and noticeable bass roll off. I eventually was able to twist the center pin and achieve much better bass balance with its partner).
This is what they measure like. Similar mods to the matte variant (no damping, Chinese pads, plated OCC Copper recable, same Sony housing).
Here is a second example of shiny revision:
Then we have my favorite variation, the Copper ground tab. It has matte flux plates, but unlike the first variation, as I mentioned, it has Copper ground tabs.
This is what they measure like, same mods:
Bit of mid-bass imbalance, but this is not uncharacteristic of YH-100's ime. To get a balanced pair of drivers is actually a bit odd ime, Yamaha QC was maybe not the best. These are the most technical of the bunch of what I've been able to get my hands on: most detail, most room acoustics, decent bass, cleanliest. I have not fully tested the various models for sibilance, but they all seem to exhibit slight excitement in the "sss," "chhh," "tttt" and even some treble regions at times given hot mastering, but this is mostly due to my mods and potentially able to be mitigated. Damping exacerbates the sibilance hence no damping on all models. Given Yamaha's use of Copper in previous generations (HP/YH-1000) I'm guessing the Copper ground tab variant is an early production, matte flux plates with Silver ground tab is mid-production, and shiny flux plates + Silver ground tab is late production.
I want to iterate that the differences between variations is somewhat small. I believe the largest jump in SQ is with the early production units (Copper ground tab) where the jump in detail and cleanliness is about as big as the jump between HP-1 and YH-100, imho. Most of the differences would probably be hard to differentiate within the stock enclosures. I feel my transplant process makes discerning differences between variations a lot easier due to added clarity and lack of housing distortions.
So, if you want my humble opinion, you like the YH-100's and indulge in collecting the various versions of them, maybe keep your eyes peeled for a Copper ground tab variant. You might be happy you stumbled on one.
-Edit-
Bit of an addendum. I find the shiny revision a little wetter and more vibrant than Copper ground tab. The Copper ground tab can be a bit dry or dull at times as reinforced with long listening sessions. I still think Copper ground tab ekes a tiny bit more detail/cuts a little deeper, but it's at a price of vibrancy.
Also, just to show you the effects of further center pin fiddling, I've been able to tune the second shiny revision measured to better match in the mid bass, see here: