- Joined
- Mar 20, 2010
- Posts
- 19,148
- Likes
- 5,334
Just wanna say, spending more time with the 250ohm and the E17. The sound is CLEEEEEEAN. Loving it. Can't wait for the E9K. I have a feeling I'll probably choose the 250ohm over the 600ohm.
Either way, I rearranged my setup a bit, and PC is in my room now, so no need to move the E9K around. The 600ohm better have some noticeable improvement, though fwir, I doubt it.
As for the 32ohm, it definitely isn't as warm as the 250ohm. Like there's a noticeable lower growl in the 250ohm that isn't in the 32ohm. Just a very slight tilt in bass, that gives the sound slightly more body. It's actually pretty noticeable. Enough to say that the 250ohm is definitely better. The 32ohm sounds slightly lean and analytical next to it. But again,. that makes the mids/vocals more forward on the 32ohm.
This is just with some music that isn't even bassy that I can tell. Like Radiohead's Paranoid Android. There's lower end missing on the 32ohm that is there on the 250ohm.
If a song is bassy, that's when the differences slim down to them being very hard to tell apart.
Either way, I rearranged my setup a bit, and PC is in my room now, so no need to move the E9K around. The 600ohm better have some noticeable improvement, though fwir, I doubt it.
As for the 32ohm, it definitely isn't as warm as the 250ohm. Like there's a noticeable lower growl in the 250ohm that isn't in the 32ohm. Just a very slight tilt in bass, that gives the sound slightly more body. It's actually pretty noticeable. Enough to say that the 250ohm is definitely better. The 32ohm sounds slightly lean and analytical next to it. But again,. that makes the mids/vocals more forward on the 32ohm.
This is just with some music that isn't even bassy that I can tell. Like Radiohead's Paranoid Android. There's lower end missing on the 32ohm that is there on the 250ohm.
If a song is bassy, that's when the differences slim down to them being very hard to tell apart.