ocnlogan
New Head-Fier
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2013
- Posts
- 11
- Likes
- 0
Quote:
No problem man (and I wasn't suggesting that you should have read through this whole thread to find my posts from a week ago, it was more that I have been in a similar predicament recently).
You'll have to get other people to tell you more about the soundstage of the CAL! in comparison to the other headphones that you're considering just because I really don't have a reference point for them. I can tell you that the soundstage is not disappointing to me, and that once or twice I thought my wife was trying to talk to me from the other room, and it turned out to be some faint audio from the music I was listening to. And I've noticed on at least a few tracks I've heard that the instruments came from "different" locations, but that hasn't been on all of the tracks I've listened to.
And about the bass prominence... I've been burning the CAL!s in for the last day or two and I could be mistaken, but I swear that the bass has tamed itself a bit. I mostly pointed out the bass "prominence" to state that they're not the ideal "flat" response curve like you'd like. Also, the bass isn't muddy IMO, and the sound experience is more like my dads klipshorns and my polk RTI A4's in the sound experience than it is like most computer 2.0 or 2.1 setups
And the Samson SR850 and the superlux hd668b are actually almost identical, and they have similar flaws but in generally "bright" (aka, too much treble) instead of being a bit dark like the CAL! (more bass heavy).
I haven't listened to the CAL on an unamped source yet, but I also didn't purchase my Fiio for this, I had it before for a DAC line in to my desktop amp for my 2.0 setup. From what I read these cans are low impedance, and high enough sensitivity that you really don't need an amp. That said, I think you'll have a better chance having a USB DAC/amp work than an internal one if you're into linux. Linux stuff is usually pretty good with anything labeled "universal". That, and the standard for USB audio has been around for a while, so you're probably good.
I'd try them without the amp first, because you can always choose to pick one up later if you want. Personally I wouldn't have one for these if I hadn't already had an amp.
Hopefully some of this helps you some .
Thanks, peter123, they look quite interesting. I wonder, though, about availability? The best price I could find (by about $30, putting them a bit over $50) was for getting them shipped from China, which makes me a bit dubious. I'm sure it's probably fine, but I'd suspect returns would be a serious issue if there were any problems. I'm also concerned about the comments that suggest they may be a problem for those with large heads. My hat size is US 7-3/4 (metric 62), which means I can wear about half of the XL hats out there, the rest being a bit on the tight side...with returns being dicey, I'm not sure I'd want to risk a fit issue without the ability to try them.
Thanks, KG Jag and ocnlogan. I did make an effort to read some of this thread, but 24K of unthreaded replies through a forum interface made more than a bit of that rather impractical. Bring back NNTP!
Given the extremely favorable opinion that many on Head-Fi have for the CAL!, it was one that I had thought about a bit. If the soundstage is relatively good, that's probably enough to push me over the edge. Though, ocnlogan, I also particularly appreciate the mentions of the other models you were considering.
Is there a chance that the bass prominence in your setup is due more to the E10 than the headphones themselves? How much should I consider getting an external DAC? It wasn't really something I'd given serious thought to...would there be enough improvement that it would take my listening experience to another level with a set of cans like the CAL!? Or would I be better off waiting until the dissertation is finished up and I'm earning actual money again, and then purchase something a step or two up the food chain?
I'm mostly using Linux (aside from gaming), and I know that support for extended features on internal cards (like various recommended Xonar models) can be a bit dicey...is the situation any better for USB? I've got two sets of computer speakers that I use, a Logitech X-540 5.1 setup on my main machine and a set of Klipsch ProMedia 2.1 THX speakers on the box intended as a music server. I love the sound of the Klipsch relative to the Logitech, but there's some sort of a shielding issue the music server box (I can hear drive activity through the speakers), so it's mostly being used to serve the files which are then played from my desktop. The 5.1 is really only useful for gaming (well, and a few Pink Floyd and Porcupine Tree surround DVD-As), so that's the set staying attached to the main box. If attaching a USB DAC to the music server could provide a clean signal to the phones and the speakers as needed, that would be a clear win. Oh, but I guess that I'd still have to swap the headphones over to the main box if I wanted a late-night gaming session. So many factors to consider!
There's probably some well-studied cognitive fallacy that makes me willing to consider spending $60 for a set of headphones and $75 for a DAC, when I'd scruple at the idea of spending $135 on 'phones alone right now.
Definitely leaning toward ordering the CAL!
No problem man (and I wasn't suggesting that you should have read through this whole thread to find my posts from a week ago, it was more that I have been in a similar predicament recently).
You'll have to get other people to tell you more about the soundstage of the CAL! in comparison to the other headphones that you're considering just because I really don't have a reference point for them. I can tell you that the soundstage is not disappointing to me, and that once or twice I thought my wife was trying to talk to me from the other room, and it turned out to be some faint audio from the music I was listening to. And I've noticed on at least a few tracks I've heard that the instruments came from "different" locations, but that hasn't been on all of the tracks I've listened to.
And about the bass prominence... I've been burning the CAL!s in for the last day or two and I could be mistaken, but I swear that the bass has tamed itself a bit. I mostly pointed out the bass "prominence" to state that they're not the ideal "flat" response curve like you'd like. Also, the bass isn't muddy IMO, and the sound experience is more like my dads klipshorns and my polk RTI A4's in the sound experience than it is like most computer 2.0 or 2.1 setups
And the Samson SR850 and the superlux hd668b are actually almost identical, and they have similar flaws but in generally "bright" (aka, too much treble) instead of being a bit dark like the CAL! (more bass heavy).
I haven't listened to the CAL on an unamped source yet, but I also didn't purchase my Fiio for this, I had it before for a DAC line in to my desktop amp for my 2.0 setup. From what I read these cans are low impedance, and high enough sensitivity that you really don't need an amp. That said, I think you'll have a better chance having a USB DAC/amp work than an internal one if you're into linux. Linux stuff is usually pretty good with anything labeled "universal". That, and the standard for USB audio has been around for a while, so you're probably good.
I'd try them without the amp first, because you can always choose to pick one up later if you want. Personally I wouldn't have one for these if I hadn't already had an amp.
Hopefully some of this helps you some .