Arcaneex
Head-Fier
- Joined
- Jan 4, 2013
- Posts
- 80
- Likes
- 10
Hey KG can you please help me aswell?
The Beyer 80 Ohm does not need an amp, but has inferior sound quality to the 250 (and higher) Ohm version. That is why I can only recommend 250 and 600 Ohm versions.
The DT 990 has a different sound signature from the DT 880 and will not work well for classical music. The 880 is the superior can in terms of accurate reproduction of music (and other sounds) as they were laid down.
Looks like the closed 8400 is your choice.
Open can for Rock for around $200 I would also look at the Ultrasone HIFI 2400
http://www.amazon.com/ULTRASONE-HFI-2400-Professional-Open-Back-Headphones/dp/B002W37ESY/ref=sr_1_8?s=electronics&ie=UTF8&qid=1358134568&sr=1-8&keywords=hifi2400
Fun can
Hey KG can you please help me aswell?
I'd like to but your preferred sound signature and mine don't overlap much. I have limited experience, knowledge and interest in most bass heavy cans.
Now to my issue: I wanna upgrade my hd 650 to either the HD 700 or HD 800 (all ready read this http://www.head-fi.org/t/612250/headphone-comparison-sennheiser-hd-600-hd-700-hd-800-hd-25-1-and-the-amperior-audio-technica-ath-m50s-audeze-lcd-2-rev-2-and-the-lcd-3 REALLY HELPFULL and the "battle of the flagships" but the opinions are quite different!!)
So I'm now a little bit confused which one to take. Some say 800 some 700 (sennheiser customer service guy told me he likes the 700 much more)
For me the hd800 is about technical achievement. They have special ring drivers supposed to offer better fidelity, and special metal mesh on the sides to minimize resonances and better "opening". You don't have a ring driver with the hd700. I don't have the supposed best source for the hd800, but the thing I enjoy the most is first their "perfect" soundstage, and their clean sound.
I think most people would like the bass of hd800 to be a bit more emphasized, and the high a bit easier on ear ( some people are even complaining of sibilance). Although you'd see the fans defending that with the right source they sound fine (similar story to k701). I think the hd800 is best for classical.
For me the hd800 is about technical achievement. They have special ring drivers supposed to offer better fidelity, and special metal mesh on the sides to minimize resonances and better "opening". You don't have a ring driver with the hd700. I don't have the supposed best source for the hd800, but the thing I enjoy the most is first their "perfect" soundstage, and their clean sound.
I think most people would like the bass of hd800 to be a bit more emphasized, and the high a bit easier on ear ( some people are even complaining of sibilance). Although you'd see the fans defending that with the right source they sound fine (similar story to k701). I think the hd800 is best for classical.
ok thank you very much so far. I´m really not listening to that much classical music and heard that the 700 would be better for rock, metal and especially Pop music (in contrast to the jazz and classical preferation of the 800)
Hey guys, for outside use for a basshead, ampless, what is the better?
AKG K167
V-Moda M50
V-moda LP2
ATH M50 ( Can get an amp/dac, namely the E7 )
DT770 80 ohm
HD 598
Source is a phone.
yeah, but the big question is if you'd prefer the hd700 to the hd650, because not everyone have same "taste".
Some people even bashed the hd700 (search for the "peaks" and purrin related thread) . The best would be to listen them before buying them.
At least with the hd800 you have the warranty of a "technical achievement" (regardless of your enjoyment).