jc9394
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Feb 6, 2006
- Posts
- 5,921
- Likes
- 60
Danny, try to get a pair of Mullard GZ37, they sounds really good and won't break your bank.
Danny, try to get a pair of Mullard GZ37, they sounds really good and won't break your bank.
Thank you, Glenn.
And what about a 5Z3, I learn that the 5Z3 in same specification and the 5U4G can be replaced with adapter, is that correct?
I have a metal base Mullard GZ34 and it sound as good as the EML I have but the amp runs much hotter. I have bring this up to Jack and did said it is fine and try to keep the listening session under 8 hours.
they both looks brown to me.
Yes the 5Z3 is identical to a 5U4 with a 4 prong base actually it is the predecessor of the 5U4. You would need a adapter
The 5AR4/GZ34 is rated for a 250 mA. draw. The GZ37 is rated at 275 mA. into a cap. I/P filter and 350 mA. into a choke I/P filter. Also, the GZ37 data sheet says 4 muF. max. for a cap. I/P filter.
The forward drop in a GZ37 is greater than that in a GZ34. So, the B+ rail voltage will be somewhat higher. Current production 5AR4s have improved significantly of late and that's what I'd use.
__________________
The 5R4 can deliver plenty of current too. 4 muF. is max. for that type too. Arc over at start up is NOT good.
There are reports about the GZ37 sounding mediocre when used as a substitute for the GZ34. My hunch is that the tube is stressed, even if it does not arc over with a substantial filter cap.
The data sheet I've seen was published by Chelmer Valve.
__________________
Eli D.
http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/tubes-valves/60100-gz37-substitution.html
My vote is the 5R4/GZ34 since I did find that the 5AR4 sound much better than the 5U4 types in my situation with a more clear and sharper sound.
The Mullard that I have seen here have brown bases.
I know the Chinese (Shuguang) and the Slovak Republic (JJ Electronic) currently produce the 5AR4. Are you aware of any others? Thanks.
Thanks for the information, john57. Do you think this pair of 5R4 is good?
![]() |
![]() |
Stay updated on Moon Audio at their sponsor profile on Head-Fi.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thanks for the information, john57. Do you think this pair of 5R4 is good?
The 5AR4/GZ34 is rated for a 250 mA. draw. The GZ37 is rated at 275 mA. into a cap. I/P filter and 350 mA. into a choke I/P filter. Also, the GZ37 data sheet says 4 muF. max. for a cap. I/P filter.
The forward drop in a GZ37 is greater than that in a GZ34. So, the B+ rail voltage will be somewhat higher. Current production 5AR4s have improved significantly of late and that's what I'd use.
__________________
The 5R4 can deliver plenty of current too. 4 muF. is max. for that type too. Arc over at start up is NOT good.
There are reports about the GZ37 sounding mediocre when used as a substitute for the GZ34. My hunch is that the tube is stressed, even if it does not arc over with a substantial filter cap.
The data sheet I've seen was published by Chelmer Valve.
__________________
Eli D.
http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/tubes-valves/60100-gz37-substitution.html
My vote is the 5AR4/GZ34 since I did find that the 5AR4 sound much better than the 5U4 types in my situation with a more clear and sharper sound.
The Mullard that I have seen here have brown bases.
Bendix 6106, the original rec or rolled-in these two amps? If the latter, what did you have in prior?