Tech Specs
- Sensitivity (2.83V/1m): 93dB
- Nominal impedance: 4Ω
I wonder would they be ok with WA5 - I think the 5 wants to see 8 ohms.
The Klipschorns...
- SENSITIVITY: 105dB @ 1watt/1meter
- NOMINAL IMPEDANCE: 8 ohms
Thank you grokit for your post. Much appreciated.
Im listening to my WEE now and it sounds very nice across all genres I listen to.
Yes I can imagine a WA5 and a WES would be a great set-up…best of all worlds that can run any HP very well on the planet !
My QBD76 DAC has both balanced XLR's and single RCA's that can run simultaneously so I could have both the WA5 and WES running together.
I have been doing this today running my WEE with my 009's connected to my Cyan Click single input (can also run balanced which is far better than single) and my WA22 balanced with my HD650's at the same time.
I'm glad I could be of help. Like yourself, I built a system that could drive any headphone well and the WEE was the electrostatic component, coming off a speaker amp that was set up to drive HE6/K1K. I started with some Lambdas that I think the WEE got more out of, but the 009 is a very special headphone that just keeps giving back the more you feed it. When I demo'd the Liquid Lightning the difference was so profound that it traumatized me to the point of nearly driving me out of this damn hobby! Now that I'm back I have no pretenses about this; I have more appreciation than ever for what I have, but I also have been to the top of the mountain and the view is spectacular. I'm sure the BHSE is excellent but if I was to go tube for the 009 I would definitely go with the WES, and with a tube front end I would certainly look into the liquid lightning or the thunderbolt. To be honest I am not current on what else might be available in the solid-state electrostatic realm these days, because I still haven't ventured back into that part of my system yet.