Woo Audio Amp Owner Unite
Mar 15, 2012 at 2:49 AM Post #19,636 of 42,298


Quote:
You might be surprised about the headband.  This was a major issue for me with the K701 when it was new.  Within 15 minutes the "nub" at the top of the inner side of the headband would start causing sharp pain on the top of my head.  It was quite bad and far too distracting to try to listen to music in such a state.  It would drive me nuts. 
 
At some point, I honestly can't even say when, it just stopped being a problem and I can wear them for hours with no pain now.  As for what changed I can't say, maybe my head got harder. 
tongue_smile.gif
  But perseverance and open mindedness are probably the two most valuable tools we can deploy against issues like this.



Hmm, thats pretty interesting, I'll give it some more time and see what happens 
rolleyes.gif

 
Mar 15, 2012 at 2:57 AM Post #19,637 of 42,298
My WA6 is a day late, but I'm happy that I'll be able to bring it up to the Seattle Head-Fi meet on April 14th. I'm really interested to hear how well it sounds with the new Sennheiser HD700.
 
Mar 15, 2012 at 3:20 AM Post #19,638 of 42,298
You just wait Austin, you just might find more headphones that just rock your WA-6........
wink_face.gif

 
Quote:
My WA6 is a day late, but I'm happy that I'll be able to bring it up to the Seattle Head-Fi meet on April 14th. I'm really interested to hear how well it sounds with the new Sennheiser HD700.



 
 
 
Mar 15, 2012 at 5:35 AM Post #19,639 of 42,298
Just wanted to show a comparison to how huge the pads are on the LCD2s, they are actually almost as massive as my old XB1000s haha
 
From left to right (D7000s, Signature Pro, LCD2) 
 

 
Sorry for the distracting scarves, I was too lazy to take them off the rack :)
 
Mar 15, 2012 at 7:29 AM Post #19,640 of 42,298

Thank you for the review. Im finding a lot of mixed opnions about lcd2.
 
Now you have me interested D7000. I wonder how much the sound signature differs from the 701s. Need to research the forums some more..
Quote:
Ok so initial impressions after several hours of listening and A/B'ing... Running ALAC and 320kbps files through my macbook air to my peachtree audio decco2 to my WA6SE running Sophia Princess rect and 6FD7 power tubes (believe they are RCA - but no label)
 
Sadly, not that impressed with the audio. They look really cool though, but are on the heavier side so they do become uncomfy after an hour..
 
Having the Ultrasone Signature Pros and the Denon D7000 to compare to, the LCD2 don't really do anything better than either of my other phones. One thing I have mixed feelings about is the ultra smooth treble (I tend to be sibilant sensitive); but its almost too laid back, like the HD650s and not even close to the detail retrieval level of the Signature Pros. Also the Soundstage on the D7000s still bests the LCD (I'm sure many people will disagree with me, but again this is how I hear it). The mid range, as many have described is very smooth, but I actually think it detracts from some recordings (especially electronic music - which I listen to a lot of).. Another thing I noticed because its so smooth I end up listening to much louder volumes to get the same level of enjoyment than I would with my other phones, I did notice the same trend with the HD650s, I guess without sibilance I don't notice loudness as much...
 
Another thing, I have read a great deal about the LCD2s, they are supposed to be the king of "realistic sounding" bass, but honestly on my setup, compared to my D7000s and Signature Pros, they are at the same level if not a tad bit less exciting in the bass department. I'm not a believer of hundreds of hours of burn in but I will let them run for about 50 hours to see if anything changes (don't expect much to change; the HifiMan HE500s didn't change much/if at all with 100+ burn in).
 
I am beginning to realize that if you want very detailed and dynamic sound, there is no escaping at least a little sibilance (which the Signature Pros and T1s have; while not over expressing sibilance, they don't hide it when its in the recording like the LCDs are doing). I always wanted a minimally sibilant headphone, but I wasn't too excited about the HD650 and now I am feeling about the same with the LCD2s. BUT, if ultra smoothness is what you are looking for and you are willing to sacrifice some clarity I believe the LCD2 is worth checking out, I am enjoying it more the HD650. I think I was initially seeking smoothness after the ultra sibilant Beyerdynamic DT990, Denon D2000s and Ultrasone Pro900s (when I started my audio journey) but I think maybe my taste has changed since then.
 
Lastly, on build quality..
I think its awesome that Audeze a relatively small company has made such a great headphone, but honestly for the price the build and feel of the Signature Pros and Denons fit the pricing category better. For example, when adjusting the headband not only is it really difficult on the Audeze, when it clicks into place there is a really cheap feel to it (just my thoughts). -btw I am a wood fan so that part of it I find very cool.
 
This initial review is to state that the headphones just didn't WOW me compared to my other headphones on my particular setup, but they are still excellent sounding.



 
 
Mar 15, 2012 at 8:06 AM Post #19,641 of 42,298


Quote:
Just wanted to show a comparison to how huge the pads are on the LCD2s, they are actually almost as massive as my old XB1000s haha
 
From left to right (D7000s, Signature Pro, LCD2) 
 

 
Sorry for the distracting scarves, I was too lazy to take them off the rack :)


Distracting? Hardly. This composition (in my view) is about "selection." The scarves are styled in their rightful places. Since I tend to listen three nights a week, you'd have me covered. 
 
 
Mar 15, 2012 at 10:17 AM Post #19,642 of 42,298


Quote:
Thank you for the review. Im finding a lot of mixed opnions about lcd2.
 
Now you have me interested D7000. I wonder how much the sound signature differs from the 701s. Need to research the forums some more..


 


Member joe posted a review on the D7000 a week and five days ago - it's located on the Home page. Then breeze through the few D7000 threads and you'll have a much better idea about 'em. Hope this helps!
 
 
Mar 15, 2012 at 2:30 PM Post #19,643 of 42,298
I have found the LCD-2/3s to be the most balanced headphone from a frequency response perspective.  And I am not talking about graphs.  Compared to other models which I find to be too bright, the LCD-2/3s are very satisfying in the bass and lower mids where others are too light.  Obviously this is personal preference.
 
Mar 15, 2012 at 5:19 PM Post #19,644 of 42,298


Quote:
Distracting? Hardly. This composition (in my view) is about "selection." The scarves are styled in their rightful places. Since I tend to listen three nights a week, you'd have me covered. 
 



beerchug.gif

 
Mar 15, 2012 at 7:16 PM Post #19,645 of 42,298


Quote:
Originally Posted by Ahzari /img/forum/go_quote.gif

Sorry for the distracting scarves, I was too lazy to take them off the rack :)


WHAT A RACK!
 
 
Mar 15, 2012 at 9:59 PM Post #19,646 of 42,298
Has anyone else heard about these ultra Denons....? Reason I call them ultra Denons is because Fostex took part in the design and production of the D2000/5000/7000 for Denon. and now the design of these new $2000 phones looks very similar to the D7000s
 
  
 
Mar 15, 2012 at 11:21 PM Post #19,647 of 42,298
Has anyone else heard about these ultra Denons....? Reason I call them ultra Denons is because Fostex took part in the design and production of the D2000/5000/7000 for Denon. and now the design of these new $2000 phones looks very similar to the D7000s




Looks like Fostex wants to capitalize on the mega buck headphones trend. I was hoping they would use an improved version of the T50RP ortho drivers but they went with a bio-cellulose driver instead. With Fostex's expertise I'm sure they will sound good but for 2 grand they better be the shiz nittle bam snip snap sack.
 
Mar 15, 2012 at 11:23 PM Post #19,648 of 42,298


Quote:
Looks like Fostex wants to capitalize on the mega buck headphones trend. I was hoping they would use an improved version of the T50RP ortho drivers but they went with a bio-cellulose driver instead. With Fostex's expertise I'm sure they will sound good but for 2 grand they better be the shiz nittle bam snip snap sack.



+1 thats competing with LCD-3 and electrostats.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top