- Joined
- Dec 30, 2013
- Posts
- 14,525
- Likes
- 9,514
NightFlight: FYI - a lot if us peruse head-fi via mobile devices, and we can't see your signature on mobile browsers - at least I can't.
@NightFlight: FYI - a lot if us peruse head-fi via mobile devices, and we can't see your signature on mobile browsers - at least I can't.
My initial impressions is that with the W40's the X5 has an odd signature. Well detailed in the highs, but perhaps a bit 'damped' on the mids and while the bottom end is clean on bass light recordings, busy works can and will fall apart in the bottom end.
Its in my sig.
In regards to the darker signature, I suspect fiddling with the gain curves via the Fiio Firmware are in place to achieve he 'Fiio house sound'.
Stay updated on HiBy at their facebook, website or email (icons below).
Stay updated on HiBy at their sponsor profile on Head-Fi.
|
https://www.google.ca/search?q=gain+curve
In this case it would be tweaking the output of the DAC pragmatically across the frequency band to change the signature. This is slightly different than an eq, because the response to gain across a curve can be varied at any band. It is by no means a new idea. DSP tools were a bit of a fad in the late 80s and early 90s. Mostly it was used to change the perceived room dynamics, like hall, amphitheater, jazz club, etc. One idea was to compensate for poor solid state amplification by trying to negate the weak points using DSP. You still find demos shipped with sound cards and the like. Mostly, it doesn't work.
As for the X5, this is total suspicion on my part and has no basis in fact or perhaps reality. But its entirely possible DSP has been used to manipulate what the amp section gets to show its better qualities and subdue its worst. Best way to make a portable player perform on the cheap.
Regardless, it works well, whatever they've done.
I think I want to point out that, as much as many of us know there is a warmish "house sound" for FiiO, I don't think FiiO themselves are fixated on just one particular sound signature across the whole line-up. The main reason for a warmish sound on their previous products is due to the fact that FiiO is not targeting an audiophiles market specifically and they have found that a warm sound is much easier to market to the general consumer. As they moved from consumer grade to audiophile grade product, the demand starts to change from wanting a warm sound to wanting a more transparent sound, as most audiophiles rather want their headphone to do the coloration instead of the source. That's why the next FiiO's DAP, the X7, is said to have the most neutral and transparent sound yet. If you are really into the warmish 'house sound' from the past, I won't say the X5 or the upcoming X7 will be the best of choice.
There is no DSP in X3 or X5 that I know of, unless of course you count the SoC as one (which it can simulate a DSP function, if wanted). The question of sound signature difference between X5 and the classic warm FiiO sound actually comes up very often in the Chinese forums. Different from the rest of the world, many Chinese audiophile actually like to have a bit more coloration in their DAP, and thus some goes as far as claiming the X5 is "defected" in sound tuning - just to show you that there is really no one correct solution to everyone. Different strokes for different folks.
https://www.google.ca/search?q=gain+curve
In this case it would be tweaking the output of the DAC pragmatically across the frequency band to change the signature. This is slightly different than an eq, because the response to gain across a curve can be varied at any band. It is by no means a new idea. DSP tools were a bit of a fad in the late 80s and early 90s. Mostly it was used to change the perceived room dynamics, like hall, amphitheater, jazz club, etc. One idea was to compensate for poor solid state amplification by trying to negate the weak points using DSP. You still find demos shipped with sound cards and the like. Mostly, it doesn't work.
As for the X5, this is total suspicion on my part and has no basis in fact or perhaps reality. But its entirely possible DSP has been used to manipulate what the amp section gets to show its better qualities and subdue its worst. Best way to make a portable player perform on the cheap.
Regardless, it works well, whatever they've done.
Actually it isn't that complicated (MP3Tag). It just takes time to learn, and get used to it. It's also very configurable, and you can virtually do an entire library once it's all set-up properly. It's just a matter of getting the defaults set-up for your needs.
What I've done is set the default tagging to a very basic FLAC style - one which only has the following tags:
Artist
Album Artist
Album
Genre
Year
Track #
Once the defaults are set-up, I first delete all tags, then click undo (which resets all the tags properly). This also gets rid of artwork. Next I display extended tags, and mark for deletion anything that doesn't appear in my above list. That leaves 6 basic tag fields. Then by album, I add artwork. I use 600x600 jpgs only. The artworks is the only thing you'll have to add by album. Everything else can be done via library.
Again - over to you if you want to spend the time learning the program - but I definitely have no problems with the X5 stuttering.
Oh - and I doubt FW3 is going to fix stuttering if the issue is with untidy tags .......
I'm using a transcend premium 300x 64mb
If you look at the basic components / layout diagram provided by Fiio (the bottom layout in the image below - top one is for X3), I'm not sure that there's been a "budget" approach taken that would then rely on DSP to "fix" it. I would also suggest that the X5 is a departure from the Fiio "house sound" given that previous products (amps, X5, etc.) have been quite warm compared to the X5.
This isn't to suggest that the X5's onboard amp is perfect as I think many of us choose to use the line-out for the better sound delivered via that path, but I'm just not sure that there's going to be deliberate efforts to alter / colour the sound with DSP. I for one like the X5 HPO, but LOVE the X5 line-out. I think the HPO sounds a little flat compared to the sound from the line-out and a good amp like the E12DIY, but it's probably a result of the OPA1612 / LMH6643 combination I expect.