The discovery thread!
Apr 30, 2013 at 3:11 PM Post #9,196 of 100,505
Quote:
 
The TDK IE800 have two microdrivers.

 
But it's not two carbon nanotube drivers. Yet the IE800 is an excellent sounding IEM.
 
Apr 30, 2013 at 3:22 PM Post #9,198 of 100,505
Quote:
True, they're just microdrivers and sound excellent. CNT isn't necessarily better, one needn't make a fetish out of it...

 
Be careful mate, you might get flamed for that statement.
 
Here on Head-Fi CNT is the stuff of audio gods!!!! 
size]

 
As proven and practiced by JVC. 
size]

 
Just take a look at the HA-S500 thread, its neverending lmao
 
Apr 30, 2013 at 3:31 PM Post #9,200 of 100,505
Apr 30, 2013 at 4:47 PM Post #9,202 of 100,505
Quote:
Btw, these single BAs were released by Sony earlier in the year:
 

 
Sony XBA-10
 
http://www.sony-asia.com/product/xba-10
 
Has anyone tried them yet??

 

For those who are interested in the new XBA-10 - I just pick up a pair on the recently opened local Sony Center. First impression is that it is extremely similar to XBA-1, but not totally identical. If I have to guess, they must have used the same BA driver but changed the acoustic damper (filter). It feels like it is less dampened now so the sonic energy is better distributed. Treble stands out just a tiny bit more while lower end texture and warmth are reduced slightly. Overall the change is small, say 10% or less, but the overall balance has improved. I would guess they have done the same to the rest of the XBA series as well, which explains why the electrical spec remain the same for all the new models. That being said, I don't think those who already own the XBA-1 should upgrade to XBA-10, as you really won't find a big upgrade between them.
 


 
Apr 30, 2013 at 6:17 PM Post #9,204 of 100,505
Quote:
OK, S500s are out of the question now, ears will be too big for them hehe. Any other suggestions?

 
I'm curious how ears could be too big for supra-aural headphones considering they're supposed to sit on top of the ears.

If you really really needed them to be circumaural you could go with the HM5 pad mod. I have pretty large ears (too big for the AT WS99 and the AKG K267 pads) and the HM5 pads fit me great.
 
Apr 30, 2013 at 6:36 PM Post #9,205 of 100,505
Quote:
Hi guys, just received my CKN70 and just found something is off when I was changing the tips. From what I see on the product page, I can see 3 small pin size hole on the bore but it seems that what I see on my pair is kind of a piece of white mesh instead. Any idea if there's anything fishy about my pair?
 
Would appreciate some feedbacks from owners here. Thanks in advance.
confused_face_2.gif

My CKN70's do not have the holes either but the pair of CKN50's have two small holes.  
 
Apr 30, 2013 at 6:51 PM Post #9,207 of 100,505
Quote:
 
I'm curious how ears could be too big for supra-aural headphones considering they're supposed to sit on top of the ears.

If you really really needed them to be circumaural you could go with the HM5 pad mod. I have pretty large ears (too big for the AT WS99 and the AKG K267 pads) and the HM5 pads fit me great.

I should've worded that differently; I'm not sure how comfortable they'd be with stock pads or WS55 pads with my ears being too big
 
Apr 30, 2013 at 7:02 PM Post #9,208 of 100,505
Remember though, I was stung using Tenso. Ended up paying £24 worth of custom fees.


Yeah dude I guess that is pretty harsh going. Not much that can be done I guess.

On the same subject, I just had word back from my Japanese eBay seller.

He said he can do them for $80 including shipping by Air Mail.

So who's in? :D
 
Apr 30, 2013 at 7:10 PM Post #9,210 of 100,505
I'll wait for them to arrive on ebay for 55-60$.I'll happen eventually. Payed 85$ for the ckn70s only to find them on ebay two weeks later for 65$.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top