EraserXIV
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Dec 5, 2008
- Posts
- 1,654
- Likes
- 85
to be honest, i thought the TF10 was pretty bad compared to the RE0
Wow, so the RE0 must sound way better than the PL50, because I thought the TF10 (borrowed them briefly) sounded noticeably better than the PL50.
Can anyone compare the RE0 and PL50? I'll have to look for threads comparing them.
Short answer: RE0 wins in terms of sound quality, especially detail, if that's your thing. PL50 wins in terms of build quality, fit, and comfort. Neither isolate well enough for truly noise environments like planes, but are good enough for general use. Most people here will say RE0 wins hands down, but I truly think that there's more to IEMs than simple sound quality. One should look at them as a total package.
Wow, so the RE0 must sound way better than the PL50, because I thought the TF10 (borrowed them briefly) sounded noticeably better than the PL50.
Can anyone compare the RE0 and PL50? I'll have to look for threads comparing them.
I thought the RE0 was quite a bit better than PL50.
I couldnt get the bass impact from the BA of the PL50 and the highs of the PL50 are nowhere near as extended as the RE0s.
The mids of the PL50s are nice, but not as nice as my RE-ZEROs.
RE-ZEROs > RE0 > PL50 thats my opinion.
RE-ZEROs are discontinued, no?
Hmm... I am listening the q-jays now and if they indeed have less treble energy than CK10 and PS200, then I think those two are definitely over the top in the treble department. I would probably consider q-jays to have about the maximum treble energy that I am willing to tolerate in a headphone, as they are already north of neutral up there. Also, I feel that the mids on the q-jays are actually very, very nice and are certainly noteworthy. They may not be the focus of the presentation, but for the price I think mids don't really get much better than that if at all. I think q-jays are only a hair behind IEMs like e-Q7 and SE530 in the mids department and up there with RE0 and IE8. IE8 may have slightly better texture, but q-jays have better resolution and speed. There is a slight dip in the upper mids, nothing major, but the lower and mid mids are fantastic on the q-jays IMO - clear, articulate and generally very accurate.
i am about pullthe trigger for an brainwavz M1. Can nu force compare to the m1's? I read good reviews about them, but they are so low in the joker's board, comparing to the m1's.
Quote:
i am about pullthe trigger for an brainwavz M1. Can nu force compare to the m1's? I read good reviews about them, but they are so low in the joker's board, comparing to the m1's.
I guess that's just the way the cookie crumbles. The NE-6 is a good earphone but if I were you I'd check the date on the really good reviews - they were extremely popular ~1.5 years ago but the budget IEM market has come a long way since then.
I am also really confused with the M1 vs the R02 (now no pre sale by mp4nation). I think this is the noobie's dilemma. I remember back to my first post here, where you suggested me the R02 over the M1.I understand that R02 have an advantage on the bass factor and a bit more sparkly(?). I dont know why but i am leaning to the M1. Maybe the R02 are a bit better but i feel the M1's idea grow on me. So since you stated that the differences are not so big and are simply different but equal i will go with the M1. I also like the no strain relief's factor, silly me, but i do.
Maybe because they are 32ohm and more balanced i think i can play better with the eq of my J3 (you have one too). And also will help me start separating the sound so i go depper into the sound hobby.
P.S which are more laid back?