Silent One
What silence said... then nothing.
- Joined
- Aug 9, 2010
- Posts
- 22,343
- Likes
- 665
Quote:
Yup, Rob is the MAN...
I'm fortunate he was on the boards this afternoon...
Yup, Rob is the MAN...
It's "Shake 'em up Saturday!" Had a Mac music player shootout:
Before = 1. Amarra 2. Pure Music 3. Audirvana Plus
After = 1. Amarra 2. Pure Music 3. Audirvana Plus
No change in preference, however, Audirvana Plus did close the gap on Pure Music. Also, I noticed that Audirvana (Both Plus & Free versions) tend to sound better when mated with the EML Glass, Amarra with the USAF-596. Though the '596' does sound good with Audirvana, the EML seems to play to Audi's strengths.
But due to cool down, I'd rather listen to Amarra/596 combo most of the time. I'm expecting a tube change in a couple of weeks, so let's see if anything changes.
how different is the differnce between the media players in terms of sound. like is it noticeable?
That "Originally posted name" is weird! Although the LCD-3's are out of reach for me, what I would like to learn is your opinion about their performance to value ratio. Is it priced about right or could those same funds be better spent another way.
It's "Shake 'em up Saturday!" Had a Mac music player shootout:
Before = 1. Amarra 2. Pure Music 3. Audirvana Plus
After = 1. Amarra 2. Pure Music 3. Audirvana Plus
No change in preference, however, Audirvana Plus did close the gap on Pure Music. Also, I noticed that Audirvana (Both Plus & Free versions) tend to sound better when mated with the EML Glass, Amarra with the USAF-596. Though the '596' does sound good with Audirvana, the EML seems to play to Audi's strengths.
But due to cool down (waiting to change over tubes), I'd rather listen to Amarra/596 combo most of the time. I'm expecting a tube change in a couple of weeks, so let's see if anything else changes. Ran Raytheon 6SN7WGT-1949's with both Recs. Maybe Sunday I'll see if the RCA Grey Glass will upset the Peach cart. (not likely)
Quote:SS, am interested in your take on the 3 as opposed to the 2.
Sorry Mike I never had the LCD2's, but I was very interested in them until the rumors about the "Big Surprise" started, I decided to what and see what the "Big Surprise" was all about. So when the announcement was made about the LCD3's my goose was cooked and I jumped on the LCD3's band wagon. The bad news is I am still looking for my wallet after buying the LCD3's.
Edit, that's strange the originally posted by name. It should read mikemalter.
Two peas in a pod?I wasn't even logged in when I received your PM. It was my night away from the listening room; was getting sleepy. And now? My mind is racing! If none of these WA22 owners make it easy for me, I'm gonna do my own thang and hit 'em with mono blocks!(couldn't help myself) Well, at least I can fire up some vintage Ella Fitzgerald. Just heard Bessie Smith on the internet singing "St Louis Blues" and she sounded sooooo good. Wish I had heard it on my amp.
It's "Shake 'em up Saturday!" Had a Mac music player shootout:
Before = 1. Amarra 2. Pure Music 3. Audirvana Plus
After = 1. Amarra 2. Pure Music 3. Audirvana Plus
No change in preference, however, Audirvana Plus did close the gap on Pure Music.
First, it's great to hear you're out and about doing what you love to do. Good music can have a positive impact on so many.... and you're a part of that.Would you kindly share more about the recording - bit depth, resolution, equipment...?
Interesting how the source has such an impact.
Beyer T1 is a great match with the WA2. Get some TungSol 5998s and Amperex Gold Lions for the WA2 and it'll sound terrific with the T1.
Indeed, especially when hard drive or SSD based.
I have heard differences in CD transports, but have never carefully compared computer playback sources.