Status
Not open for further replies.
Apr 12, 2012 at 8:34 PM Post #18,016 of 24,807


Quote:
I sent them 2 emails so far asking when the SR-009 will be back in stock since I have been waiting for mine for 4 weeks. No response yet.
Today I tried to find the eamil address for the company in Japan and cound not find one. Apparently they cancel thier address and ask people to go though their country distributor. That would be find is the distributor has some cusotmer service
mad.gif
.



Maybe this as another option?
http://www.wooaudio.com/headphones/stax/sr009.html
 
I've bought several things from Woo Audio (and I know you have too) with great customer support.
 
Apr 12, 2012 at 10:56 PM Post #18,018 of 24,807
Surprisingly Stax-USA responded. He said they will be receiving a few SR-009 next week. Hopefully mine are part of those...
wink.gif

 
Moon Audio Stay updated on Moon Audio at their sponsor profile on Head-Fi.
 
https://www.facebook.com/MoonAudio/ https://twitter.com/MoonAudio https://instagram.com/moonaudio https://www.moon-audio.com/ https://www.youtube.com/@moon-audio sales@moon-audio.com
Apr 12, 2012 at 11:22 PM Post #18,019 of 24,807
Beside comfort, could you explain the sound improvement from the 507 pads ? How they sound better and why it could be so (shape, dimensions, material, etc...)
 
Also, I find my original Lambda very hot. I wonder how the pads material could change that... Any experience with that ?
 
Thanks all,
 
 
Quote:
AFAIK the 407 and 507 share a driver, but feature a different set of pads (which IMO are way superior and can easily be bought separately but aren't cheap), headband assembly and cable. The pads make a big difference to sound, the headband makes none. I don't know what difference cables make with electrostatic headphones, I believe from blind testing they make none with dynamics.
 



 
 
Apr 13, 2012 at 1:11 AM Post #18,022 of 24,807
Count me as coming in third.  Tats has never given me anything but stellar service.
 
Apr 13, 2012 at 3:13 PM Post #18,024 of 24,807
Different pads on any pair of headphones changes the sound, the acoustic space between the driver and your ear is changed, the vibrations interact differently with different material surfaces and if the material is porous or not (in this case neither is) changes a lot. 
 
There are actually three types of modern lambda pads: First the old pleather ones with foam screens that sound very nice to my ear, a little veiled, softer, sweeter, very graceful and with the greatest soundstage of them all. I found the foam really uncomfortable as it touched my ear which is why I got the leathers, but sonically I thought they were great.
 
Then there are the unfortunate modern pleather ones with cloth screens and sticky underpadded pleather which sound, in my opinion, absolutely terrible. The treble is squawky, the sound just a bit smeared all over and they feel horrible on the ears. I doubt I'd have ever liked lambdas if I'd heard them with those pads first. I find it really hard to believe someone at Stax thought that was an improvement on the old style.
 
For my tastes they sound best with the leathers. They maybe have a tiny amount more bass quantity but obvious greater bass impact, are clearer across the frequency range and an increased vibrancy of the sound. I know "vibrancy" is a bit of a vague term, but you're not going to get how the sound changes without hearing for yourself anyway. 
 
And yes, they are much less sweaty on the ears. Whether the sound is preferred will no doubt vary person to person but I'd have trouble believing anyone could disagree they are the most cool and comfortable of them all.
 
Quote:
Beside comfort, could you explain the sound improvement from the 507 pads ? How they sound better and why it could be so (shape, dimensions, material, etc...)
 
Also, I find my original Lambda very hot. I wonder how the pads material could change that... Any experience with that ?
 
Thanks all,
 
 


 



 
 
Apr 13, 2012 at 4:08 PM Post #18,025 of 24,807
If anyone has a three (or even two) different earpads for a pair of Lambda's, it would be interesting to get them measured by Tyll to see how big the difference really is in terms of frequency response, and maybe 30Hz square wave response.
 
Apr 13, 2012 at 4:12 PM Post #18,026 of 24,807
I've been waiting a while to find some pads for my NB sr-lambda.  any opinions on which version of the lambda pads sound best.  I dont really care about color.  if the brown leather sound the best, so be it.  I'm also surprised there arent more options for pads.  I've heard  you can get them at kuboten, but my japanese isnt very good. lol.
 
Apr 13, 2012 at 4:32 PM Post #18,027 of 24,807
Quote:
If anyone has a three (or even two) different earpads for a pair of Lambda's, it would be interesting to get them measured by Tyll to see how big the difference really is in terms of frequency response, and maybe 30Hz square wave response.

 
I have all three varieties for my SR-303, but I'm not going to send them to America and do without them for headphone science, sorry! Would definitely be interesting to see though...
 
Apr 14, 2012 at 5:30 AM Post #18,028 of 24,807
A / B Comparison   Stax T1  amp   vs  SRD-7pro driven by DIY First Watt F3  (Nelson Pass power JFET design)
 
SR-007 mkII  /  Lambda Pro Signature  / Koss ESP-950
 
First off- a caveat. I don't have any kind of switch for Stax phones where I can switch the phones between 2 different amps in true A / B fashion.  I have to quickly unplug the phones from one socket and plug them into the other.  No as good as a switch, but I've got the action down to about 1~2 seconds.  Also- note-  NOT a blind test.  Didn't go to that level of analysis here.
 
It's pretty easy to sum this up, as the differences were readily apparent.
 
SR-007  mk II
The T1 sounded clearer, more refined.  Bass extension good, treble smooth, and attainable volume level was OK.
SRD-7 had more impact in the bass, and overall good sound, but not as refined or transparent as the T1.
 
Lambda Pro Signature
T1  Refined, detailed, transparent sound with good bass extension.
SRD-7 The difference between SRD-7 and T1 on the Lambda Signatures  was not as audible as on the SR-007's. Lambda Mids might have been a little more 'liquid' from the JFET amp coming through the SRD-7 as compared to the T1.  Pretty close, overall.
 
KOSS ESP-950 (with Stax cable)
T1 Very good sound but runs out of steam, especially in the bass. Plays FAIRLY loud without distortion, but it would not go as loud as I wanted and some bass material sounded distorted at even moderate levels.
SRD-7 Excellent sound from the ESP-950's.  Effortless ability to drive the headphones loudly at bass frequencies.  Maybe not quite as "refined" sounding as the T1 in the treble.  T1 seemed to offer more detail.
 
Overall, I'd have to say I prefer the T1 pretty strongly over the SRD-7 on the SR-007's.  More of a toss up on the Lambdas.  With the ESP-950  I prefer the SRD-7.
 
 
 
Apr 14, 2012 at 4:28 PM Post #18,029 of 24,807
nothing but Stax trouble for me; first some loose rca jacks on the srm-1 mk2 now the extension cord.
I using an SRD-6 with the SR5 and SRD7sb with the nb Lambda. Both headphones "run out of gas" with this cable; six pin Female and five pin male. I'm guessing this cable has a resistor (idk) that drops the voltage down from 580V to 230V so the old Stax sets can be used with Pro bias jacks, someone confirm this? thanks
 
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

  • carr
Back
Top