spritzer
Member of the Trade: Mjölnir Audio
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2002
- Posts
- 10,055
- Likes
- 191
Quote:
And how's the bass, Spritz? How does it compare with a KGSS? Do you agree there's no dynamic headphone with bass to match the Stax Omega II? The analogy I give to someone who's never heard them: "This is what a bass drum sounds and feels like on the Sennheiser 650s (I flab the palm of my hand on his chest). "This is what a bass drum sounds like on the Stax (I hit him in the chest with my fist). It gets the point acrossWhich brings up the whole issue of how to handle sub-bass response accurately in headphones. My reference mastering room includes accurate JL subwoofers which actually can flap your pants legs with the low bass (to say nothing of how it feels in your chest). Obviously there's no headphone that can replicate that experience. However, the O2s have such extended sub bass that you can feel it in your eardrum and perhaps in the bones of your head as an impact. At first it's an eerie experience to feel clean, impacting, low distortion sub bass where no previous headphone you've ever heard was able to do it. But you quickly get used to it, and with some willfull suspension of disbelief, mentally supply the missing chest sensations. I know this sounds too much like imagination gone wild, but you have to experience rock and roll or fusion jazz (think Anthony Jackson or Marcus Miller) reproduced on O2s yourself to understand the literal physical (not just acoustic) sensations these phones can produce. Wimpy headphone amps need not apply. I'm very glad I rebuilt, recapped and minified an ancient Stax amp before I got these O2s! Just how much better is the KGSS going to sound?
The bass on the Blue Hawaii amps is even more powerful and controlled. Again even more so with the DIY-T2 as we just keep throwing more standing power at them. Basically it is a matter of making sure that there will always be more then enough current on hand for any stage, regardless of the impedance presented by the transducers. On top of that the amp has to swing enough voltage to be just idling at normal levels (but also have a massive amount of headroom) and have a low enough output impedance and a high enough slew rate to make good use of these. Just look at those massive heatsinks on the T2 and when it is stacked it runs hot enough that people can burn their fingers on the volume knob. That is just a lot of Class A stages and constant current sources burning off current. The amp might be the most complex headphone amp ever designed but the signal path is very simple, it's just the stuff supporting it that is so complex.
As for the KGSS, it is a brilliant design but the reason we are doing a new one, the KGSSHV is to make up for the lack of a CCS in the third stage. This was due to the lack of good parts at the time of the design and the extra cost of adding those parts. I love my KGSS but it has been sitting unused and buried under crap for a while now due to surplus of other amps that had to be modified and evaluated. I did just fire it up though.
No dynamic can come close to the Stax, even the 1979 SR-Lambda is far better in most aspects then the Sennheiser HD800. Let alone their very own HE60 which may be 17 years old but still makes the HD800 sound really poor in direct comparison. When I did that comparison I even dealt the HE60 a crap hand on purpose by using an old Stax SRM-T1 amp which was in dire need of refurbishing and I didn't even bother to bias the tubes. Still it was way superior to the HD800/SPL Auditor. I've also recently spent some time with the HD6xx line, Grado RS1, RS2 and HP2 and the AKG K1000, none of them are even close.