Which set of phones?
Second hand SR-5 or one of the three "budget" phones SR-202, 303 or 404?
I've got a pair of white SR-5's and need to buy a second set for the Hybrid eXStatA amp that I am just starting to put together .
How markedly different are the newer "Budget" Phones compared to my SR-5's There are quite a few SR-5's for sale for under 130 Euros that I can see and although I am quite willing to pay between 400 - 700 euros for one of the newer Budget models , just wonder how much better these will perform than my old SR-5.
Given I have the eXStatA SS and soon my new Hybrid I will be buying the phones without bundled amps and wonder if there is a big difference between the three budget phones or if its more the difference between the bundled amps/adaptors that differentiate then.
Thanks
The white SR5 has a nice balanced sound and is I think a great phone. However the later Lambdas (I have a Signature and 404) have more definition and timbre due possibly to the thinner diaphragms or higher bias. Also they have more treble and deeper bass. Of course you are going to need a high bias amp or transformer box. I personally recommend the old SRM1Mk2 amp with high and low bias sockets.
I can't speak as to the differences between the 202, 303 and 404 but I am very sceptical of those who claim advantages of the cheaper models. Only with the 404 do you get the top of the line cable, same as the 007.
I am a proponent of removing the foam backing of all Lambdas.
.
http://www.head-fi.org/forum/thread/443060/is-the-stax-lambda-signature-supposed-to-be-damped-on-second-thought-ditch-the-foam-backing-on-all-the-lambdas
After I got new foam backing for my Signatures I discovered they sounded like crap and removed them. I suspect a lot of the sonic differences between various Lambdas are due to differing thicknesses of the back foam and one reason many old Lambdas sound good is that the back foam has deteriorated on them to the point that they are not really there, messing up the sound.