Quote:
Originally Posted by catscratch /img/forum/go_quote.gif
I'm disappointed with Stax these days, to say the least.
|
I'm not disappointed with Stax, but of course I wouldn't mind more improved products.
I don't think as badly of the O2Mk2 as some others do, but I do think that it is different enough from the O2Mk1 to be potentially disappointing for those who really like the O2Mk1. If one considers the O2Mk1 to be the most neutral, least colored and best tonally balanced, I can understand how the O2Mk2 would then be considered inferior. But then, if the difference between the Mk1 and Mk2 means so much, that would probably also mean the person considers all other headphones inferior to the O2Mk1.
So, O2Mk1 fanboys dissing all other headphones, including O2Mk2? Not exactly a surprising phenomenon.
Nah, I'm just joking with the fanboys bit. I don't think it's fanboyism to prefer the O2Mk1. I also like the O2Mk1 very much and consider it one of my Top 5 favorites, or maybe even Top 3. Top 2 is also possible, but not Top 1.
I think the O2Mk2, 4070 and Airbow SR-SC1, all current production models, are competitive with or better than most other current headphones. I haven't heard the Jade, Ultrasone Ed. 9, TakeT and a few others, but I believe the Stax models are well-matched with most other current alternatives.
Even versus out of production headphones, I think the current Stax lineup acquits itself reasonably well. The HE90, HE60, O2Mk1, SR-Omega, K1000, R10, Qualia, L3000, PS-1, HP-2 are tough competitors. But even so, I think the O2Mk2 doesn't do too badly, and the 4070 and SR-SC1 have their own unique strengths to compete effectively.
4070: relative price, closed, isolation, details, clarity
SR-SC1: price, lightweight, comfort, all-around good performance