Status
Not open for further replies.
Dec 16, 2011 at 8:08 AM Post #16,952 of 24,807


Quote:
I've heard from others that it should be some what between the both.  So I'm asking just incase someone has heard it recently.  There are many on here just just your opinion so I ask to get more than one opinion. 
 



Tyll Hertsens at Innerfidelity has measured both the 02mk1s and the 02mk2.5s I believe. See: http://www.innerfidelity.com/headphone-data-sheet-downloads
 
That should tell you everything you need to know.
 
Dec 16, 2011 at 1:23 PM Post #16,953 of 24,807
Ya i asked him on youtube if he did the reading on the 2.5 but no answer  yet.  Im assuming hes on head-fi also though I'm not sure of his username. Ttyl perhaps?  I only see 2 readings wouldnt there be 3?  MKA, MK1, MK2.5?  Idk.  Its early here I just might be confusing myself.  
 
Dec 16, 2011 at 1:35 PM Post #16,954 of 24,807

Like I told you before the Z3 is the 2.5
Quote:
Ya i asked him on youtube if he did the reading on the 2.5 but no answer  yet.  Im assuming hes on head-fi also though I'm not sure of his username. Ttyl perhaps?  I only see 2 readings wouldnt there be 3?  MKA, MK1, MK2.5?  Idk.  Its early here I just might be confusing myself.  


 
 
 
Dec 16, 2011 at 2:07 PM Post #16,956 of 24,807


Quote:
Ok.  I looked at the frequency charts on both and I see a more mid bass in the z3.  But Im looking from my phone from the Drs office so Im most likely missing some info.  By more trebly are you saying there is less of the bass hump?

I'm pretty sure that its not a bass hump that makes a headphone bright. There are some inputs on this thread about them just search.
 
 
 
Dec 16, 2011 at 10:27 PM Post #16,958 of 24,807
Dec 17, 2011 at 12:04 AM Post #16,959 of 24,807
Ya I didn't say anything about the bass hump having anything to do with the treble.  I couldn't see the chart well enough but I did see that the frequency isn't much different.  
 
Quote:
I'm pretty sure that its not a bass hump that makes a headphone bright. There are some inputs on this thread about them just search.
 
 



 
 
Dec 17, 2011 at 12:10 AM Post #16,960 of 24,807


Quote:
Ya i asked him on youtube if he did the reading on the 2.5 but no answer  yet.  Im assuming hes on head-fi also though I'm not sure of his username. Ttyl perhaps?  I only see 2 readings wouldnt there be 3?  MKA, MK1, MK2.5?  Idk.  Its early here I just might be confusing myself.  


http://www.head-fi.org/u/85/tyll-hertsens
 
 
Dec 17, 2011 at 6:36 PM Post #16,962 of 24,807
After a few days of listening...I don't know if it's just me, but the SR-202 + SRM-212 sounds a bit...weird coming from the modified SR-Lambda + SRD-7/SB + receiver. It's like the sound is more..."sterile" or something, perhaps more "flat", but not so much in the frequency response sense. I can't quite find the word for it.
 
Is this a trait of the SR-202 itself, or does the sound signature change significantly with a better amp?
 
Dec 18, 2011 at 8:51 AM Post #16,963 of 24,807


Quote:
After a few days of listening...I don't know if it's just me, but the SR-202 + SRM-212 sounds a bit...weird coming from the modified SR-Lambda + SRD-7/SB + receiver. It's like the sound is more..."sterile" or something, perhaps more "flat", but not so much in the frequency response sense. I can't quite find the word for it.
 
Is this a trait of the SR-202 itself, or does the sound signature change significantly with a better amp?


http://hometheaterreview.com/stax-srs-2050-ii-basic-headphones/
in this article the author mentions nothing about better amp sounding different, ie: more depth, better dynamics. sadly you'd need to a/b them with another stax owner. there must be someone here in Georgia or the southeastern US
 
 
Dec 18, 2011 at 9:40 AM Post #16,964 of 24,807


Quote:
After a few days of listening...I don't know if it's just me, but the SR-202 + SRM-212 sounds a bit...weird coming from the modified SR-Lambda + SRD-7/SB + receiver. It's like the sound is more..."sterile" or something, perhaps more "flat", but not so much in the frequency response sense. I can't quite find the word for it.
 
Is this a trait of the SR-202 itself, or does the sound signature change significantly with a better amp?


I had a similar problem with SRM-313 and SR-303. Problem solved when I changed original powercords from amp and cd-player (Audio Aero Prima). UnfortunateIy I never tried to change powercord just from one machine at a time.
 
 
Dec 18, 2011 at 2:51 PM Post #16,965 of 24,807
I've had the SR-202 only with SRN717 and the KGSS. They sounded faboulous from both of them. There wan't anything sterile with it to my ears. That's more like HD800 sound IME.
tongue.gif


 
Quote:
 
Is this a trait of the SR-202 itself, or does the sound signature change significantly with a better amp?



 
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top