So waynes world:
Let me get right to it, the H-200 is very good (quite good actually), but not a threat to the CKS1000. First, the sound signatures are nothing alike. The 1K still has an instrument separation, instrument placement, natural timbre, and 3-D like non-other. It's only when you compare other earphones back to back with the 1K that you realize it's how beautiful and unique it's sound signature is. And the bass is so rich and refined and deep, but not overblown.
The H-200, on the hand, is a more neutral sound earphone. I would say that the H-200's soundstage is wider than the the 1K (but not deeper). Bass is definitely there, but doesn't get as low and as rich as the 1K. Then again, the bass driver hasn't open up yet. The H-200 is what I would call 3-D-light. It's there and heavier than the GR07, but the notes aren't as thick and rich as the 1K. The 1K is more refined, but I wouldn't say the H-200 is way behind it. Again, I don't want to rate the H-200 until about 50 hours of burn-in. I would consider the 1K a top tier, and I would consider the H-200 a "high-end" mid-tier. So I place it somewhere between the GR07 (CKN-70/IE800) and 1K. It's slight step above the BA200 right now (which is one of my favorite universals too, but it doesn't have the bass of the H-200. H-200 has better instrument separation than the BA-200. That's it for now. I need more listening.