I don't understand reality at all when I see all that hype around Shanling M5 Ultra (or is it about MUSE?). The Shanling player has got huge output impedance (4.7 Ohm for SE and 6.6 Ohm for balanced output). It could result in tonality distortions on using low impedance IEMs. I don't understand manufactures producing such products. The only guess is: "we don't know how to make it better, then we will do it just different - users will not understand this background".
Wait... OI through 4.4mm is 6.6Ω???
Why tf were these numbers not made public before?
I know folks were asking for detailed power specs but information received was vague (or non-existent) in replies to these queries.
Man... this gives me a bit of worry and I am wondering whether or not to cancel my order...
6.6Ω (or even 4.7 SE) is pretty high for IEMs...
I wonder whether using an impedance adapter would make a [positive[ difference in perception of sound quality???
Dang!
Could any of y'all with the M5U try to test your IEMs with lower OI IEMs and tell us whether you perceive any degradation or distortions?
Would be much appreciated and would probably go a long way in easing my concerns.
I knew this was probably going to come up.
Got you covered.
Listing for the Shanling M5 Ultra
Here's the Muse Hifi M5 Ultra
Yes, Muse Hifi is being not fully forth coming with specifications due to some "proprietary" things or confidentiality agreement.
But it's been fine with IEMs. The output impedance concern is on a different product altogether.
It's also why I try make sure I include Muse Hifi when I mention the M5 Ultra since there is definitely another major product with the same name. Just so things aren't confusing.
Just a small mix up in this case.
VERY interesting results. This once again highlights the importance of sources, how they can sculpt the sound and affect your impressions, especially with sensitive iems. My standard measuring dac is a Jcally JM6 pro. All measurements below done with my standard foam tip.
Funny how the Muse M5U 3.5 squeezes out more bass compared to its 4.4, in both vacuum tube and transistor modes.
Edit: DC-Elite was connected to power bank with CB19 when I did these measurements.
WTH so the "sound different" reviewed all this time is all because of the high impedance output?? well.. like
@anli said "The only guess is: "we don't know how to make it
better, then we will do it just
different - users will
not understand this background". lol
btw
@Ineras so all this time your measurement are based with jcally JM6 pro? no wonder your graph have more bass compared to mine. I'm using apple dongle for graphing.
Well i know i think maybe diferent but what is that super special with ebc 80. Because from review i think you can have it second hand mest for years maybe.
Easy answer. Because who wants a SECOND HAND MEST when you can have a brand new EBC80? The romance with old popular gear can really skewer the thought process. Though old gear can really be of value and performance (My Sennheiser IE800 comes to mind), I'm not going to actively go out and seek a newer copy of that same model, with the existence of the EBC80. I'm going to buy the EBC80, and skip buying another IE800 at the same price, despite the oldie being a goodie.
Well mest is legendary iem. Personaly my goal is in balanced way so i need go diferent route.
Well, from humble experience with long time Mest user and had them on top of the list for years, I reach to my Shock often more recently, not because of just merely new toy effect (Have Shock for a month + by now) just because the Shock have special spatial and imaging, yes its better than Mest, or Odin, or u12t or lot of TOTLs I've tried / own. Even the soundstage is wider than my Z1R with certain settings.
I was denial but right now I'm so sure. The Sonion BCD are revolutionary drivers, more so than planars IMHO.
There are very great Midfi set because of the better tuning and drivers, like Cantor (that
@o0genesis0o said better than his u12t), Shock, EBC80, Thieaudio Origins etc.
Diminishing return starts early currently, starting from the Shock on $599.
*disclaimer : I'm not Penon shiller, Shock is my first TSMR and I bought them full price with my own money., If they are bad I just saying without hesitate, like in my previous impressions.
I got second hand mest mk1 for $550 and the seller gave me Fiio FH7 for $135 because i purchased from him the mest.
I think it was a good deal.
I enjoy the mest mk1 more than mk2.
Mk1 has weaker sub bass but stronger mid bass, the mids are about the same for me and the soundstage is also more impressive on the MK1.
Me too personally chose Mest OG than the Mk2, and I'm agree that Soundstage and imaging is a tad better on Mk1 compared to Mk2 as confirmed by
@Precogvision too (Yes I double asked him for his opinion too and he prefer Mest OG too) with notes, the Mk2 have better timbre or less metallic on high mids / lower trebles and more subbass present perceiving because of the overall tonality.
Crazy how the Shock is beating the Mest in Mest speciality, Imaging and spatial departments.