Where did you get this information from? If you look at the rendered photos of these drivers, they look different. And what size is indicated, well, I would not compare the identity of the drivers by sizeThe Talos and Dioko have a different driver but identical!
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
The discovery thread!
- Thread starter Dsnuts
- Start date
-
- Tags
- blon bl03 db3 ibasso am05 isn d02 isn h40 jq audio jvc-ha-fx101 jvc-ha-fx40-b-earphone-kv6902 nx7 nx7 pro philips-she3580-28-in-ear-headphones philips-she9700 pioneer-dje-1500-k-professional-dj-in-ear-headphones sony-mh1-livesound-hi-fi-stereo-in-ear-headphones sphere thermaltake-in-ear-headset tri i3 vsonic-vc1000
Redcarmoose
Headphoneus Supremus
Just going by HBB’s chart?
Where did you get this information from? If you look at the rendered photos of these drivers, they look different. And what size is indicated, well, I would not compare the identity of the drivers by size
Ahhh no, I don't follow him...Just going by HBB’s chart?
If it’s of interest you should try to check out the Michael Bruce’s video tear down of the Wu Zetian.If you look at their exposed-view diagrams they are all different: different coils, different number of magents and spacing and likely different diaphargm material, not to mention the different bracket and damper designs. It's good to know that they are not made with the same planar driver, probably by the same OEM maker thou.
Super revealing (and destructive) but the tear down shows definite similarities to the Timeless, Hook-X and P1 Max diagrams since the Wu didn’t publish one. They are marketing that it is 14.5mm but the tear down shows it is actually 14.2mm and has equivalent make-up. The Wu and Timeless (from a tear down I saw previously) share the same driver case markings, I was informed that Earbridge are the driver OEM.
His tear down of S12 (through his shortbus mod videos) looked like a similar OEM from the driver casing but hard to see as markings were side down and unlike with the Wu he didn’t tear down the driver also. Again I have been informed that Earbridge are the driver OEM of the 14.8mm driver and this driver is from the same family as the 14.2mm variants.
I purchased the GD3C on release but never had the GD3A. I haven't listened to it in months but I remember it being thin with its noteweight, with BA timbre and not especially impressive technically. Tuning is safe and inoffensive. The build and fit can't be beat at the price - light, well contoured and beautifully transparent.
I posted this a little while ago and felt the need to post a follow-up. I pulled the GD3C out of the draw and spent some time with it this afternoon. The note weight is actually very good and the timbre certainly not as bad as I remembered it to be. It's a carefully tuned V shape and it has a lovely, slightly recessed but clear midrange with plenty of sparkle up top. I got the GD3C during a pretty busy time in my life and put the recent lukewarm recollection down to poor memory and not giving it enough time. I hope this helps @o0genesis0o.
Last edited: