How good is KATO, technically? Is it close to Blessing 2? From the review of Precog, I have the impression that it is not that good, still plagued by the over dampening (pillowy bass, slightly mushy note attacks)
Well comparing different transducers (single DD like KATO versus a hybrid Blessing 2) is gonna be an apples to oranges comparison as the different transducers have their own pros and cons.
But FWIW, the KATO is definitely inferior to the Blessing 2 in technicalities (agree with @RikudouGoku ), but the Blessing 2 has a less natural timbral accuracy than the KATO. So depends what you prioritize more for the music.
Even among midFI single DDs, the KATO is not class leading in technicalities. Stuff like the Tanchjim Oxygen beat the KATO in technicalities.
So, I made a right choice not to buy it
Btw: Oi, it’s you! I have read your posts here and there since my first days in this hobby. i bought FD5 because your comments. We finally “meet”
Speaking technical performance, have anyone tried Hidizs MD4? I am putting it through its pace. Super impressive resolution and effective tuning switches. I haven’t had such fun with an IEM for a while.
The Hidizs MD4 is indeed very technically proficient, with tuning switches to change the sound signature.
I think it can be a good stage monitor as such, as it has great isolation too.
![Hidizs MD4 Switches.jpg Hidizs MD4 Switches.jpg](https://cdn.head-fi.org/a/11874764.jpg)
Graphs pf the Hidizs MD4 via IEC711 compliant coupler. Measurements above 10 kHz are not accurate.
My beef with the Hidizs MD4 is the BA bass is quite unnatural, lacking movement of air and extension. So there are some tonal flaws, and it can be shouty on some switches. There's also BA timbre and it is quite fussy for source pairing (based on audiophile rules of 8ths) due to the low impedance of 8 ohm.