Redcarmoose
Headphoneus Supremus
Excellent!My Reecho OVA SG-01 review is up. Only the second 5/5 I have yet awarded! Totally blown away by this $50 marvel.
Excellent!My Reecho OVA SG-01 review is up. Only the second 5/5 I have yet awarded! Totally blown away by this $50 marvel.
Could you please compare OVA with sg-03?As crazy as it seems the Reecho SG-01 OVA is their best sounding earphone and it costs $50. They did two seasonal earphones Spring and Summer and both of them were a bit underwelming. Their insects awaken is good but is way too V shaped in signature and lacks lower mids. Their SG-01 is for bass fans but also lacks some lower mids emphasis.
For the sub $50 price point the SG-01 OVA is simply superb. They are more competitive in the $100 price point but at $50? I remember some cheaper Sony, JVCs and philips earphones that did bass excellent back in the day around the price range but the whole package? Nothing touches em. It has to be one of the best if not the best allrounder at the price range.
And comparison with CCA CRA+ and HZ Mirror would be very instructive.Could you please compare OVA with sg-03?
Oh, little notification.My Reecho OVA SG-01 review is up. Only the second 5/5 I have yet awarded! Totally blown away by this $50 marvel.
Could you please compare OVA with sg-03?
Sorry my friend don't own those two but I have a feeling more folks will gradually get on the SG-01 bandwagon and someone will compare sooner than later.And comparison with CCA CRA+ and HZ Mirror would be very instructive.
do you have Trip Mele?Been a while since I took out the SG-03 but even vs the older SG-01 the SG-01 had the better balanced presentation vs the SG-03. SG-03 as you know is a bass specialist earphone. Very niche in the stout sub bass it has vs other in ears. 15dbs of the stuff vs 10dbs of bass on the SG-01. So in order for the SG-03 to have some semblence of clairity it has to have bit more upper mids presence vs the SG-01 and to keep that bass clean has to have larger lower mid dip so it is a much more drastic V shaped signature. The SG-01 due to better balancing is more versatile vs the SG-03. SG-03 male vocals lack presence due to a recessed lower mids. It has good clarity for such a bassy earphone but it is done with that lack of lower mids presence which is the catch on those.
This being said I always thought the SG-03 had a lot of potential especially with an upgraded cable.
The SG-01 still has a lot of bass but it is tasteful and while the SG-03 still has the leg up on the bass presence. I would trade up a bit of sub bass in order to get more lower mids presence and better balancing as a trade off and that is really what the SG-01 does. It is using a graphene composite and there is really nothing lacking on the SG-01 or has any glaring flaws to its presentation. That alone is worthy of checking out a set.
If any of you guys own the SG-03 as is wondering getting the SG-01 OVA will be worth it. Absolutely.
Sorry my friend don't own those two but I have a feeling more folks will gradually get on the SG-01 bandwagon and someone will compare sooner than later.
Been a while since I took out the SG-03 but even vs the older SG-01 the SG-01 had the better balanced presentation vs the SG-03. SG-03 as you know is a bass specialist earphone. Very niche in the stout sub bass it has vs other in ears. 15dbs of the stuff vs 10dbs of bass on the SG-01. So in order for the SG-03 to have some semblence of clairity it has to have bit more upper mids presence vs the SG-01 and to keep that bass clean has to have larger lower mid dip so it is a much more drastic V shaped signature. The SG-01 due to better balancing is more versatile vs the SG-03. SG-03 male vocals lack presence due to a recessed lower mids. It has good clarity for such a bassy earphone but it is done with that lack of lower mids presence which is the catch on those.
This being said I always thought the SG-03 had a lot of potential especially with an upgraded cable.
The SG-01 still has a lot of bass but it is tasteful and while the SG-03 still has the leg up on the bass presence. I would trade up a bit of sub bass in order to get more lower mids presence and better balancing as a trade off and that is really what the SG-01 does. It is using a graphene composite and there is really nothing lacking on the SG-01 or has any glaring flaws to its presentation. That alone is worthy of checking out a set.
If any of you guys own the SG-03 as is wondering getting the SG-01 OVA will be worth it. Absolutely.
Sorry my friend don't own those two but I have a feeling more folks will gradually get on the SG-01 bandwagon and someone will compare sooner than later.
It only took Tin Hifi like 10 IEM releases to realize that MMCX is garbage and 2-pin is a LOT better.https://www.facebook.com/TINhifiOfficial/posts/501440771680389
New Tin HIFI IEM. Called the Space Station apparently. Glad to see they woke up their idea and have shifted to 2-pin instead of their MMCX which has a high failure rate (for their budget Tin series).
https://www.linsoul.com/products/hidiz-mm2?variant=42627039723737I don't know if Hidizs Mermaid MS2 is a discovery but honestly it is a great sub - $100 IEM and since I couldn't find any related discussion I thought to post my review here.
https://www.head-fi.org/showcase/hidizs-ms2.24969/review/28459/
Thank you.
As crazy as it seems the Reecho SG-01 OVA is their best sounding earphone and it costs $50. They did two seasonal earphones Spring and Summer and both of them were a bit underwelming. Their insects awaken is good but is way too V shaped in signature and lacks lower mids. Their SG-01 is for bass fans but also lacks some lower mids emphasis.
For the sub $50 price point the SG-01 OVA is simply superb. They are more competitive in the $100 price point but at $50? I remember some cheaper Sony, JVCs and philips earphones that did bass excellent back in the day around the price range but the whole package? Nothing touches em. It has to be one of the best if not the best allrounder at the price range.
I have medium-small ears and the OVA fits perfectly flush, great for slide sleeping, one of the few that work for my ears.One slightly odd question - How thick is the SG-01 OVA, and do you think they'd be comfortable for use while sleeping?
I have no issues with quality MMCX. The fact they can rotate means that over-ear cables can be adjusted to the ideal angle for my ears. 2-pin cables can sometimes put irritating pressure where they go over my ears because 2-pin doesn't have rotation.It only took Tin Hifi like 10 IEM releases to realize that MMCX is garbage and 2-pin is a LOT better.
I don't think there is any good reason to choose MMCX over 2-pin.
Yupp. MCX and MMCX connectors are used everywhere in tons of applications. The trouble here are users who don't know how to properly disconnect MMCX. They pull first, realize this does not work and sure enough they pull and bend a bit. Do this ten times and the connector is toast. The trick is to rotate and pull at the same time. Easy. Piece of cake.I have no issues with quality MMCX. The fact they can rotate means that over-ear cables can be adjusted to the ideal angle for my ears. 2-pin cables can sometimes put irritating pressure where they go over my ears because 2-pin doesn't have rotation.