jant71
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Feb 19, 2005
- Posts
- 8,365
- Likes
- 6,198
What is your reasoning for that? I find both CNT and Be to be really great material for DDs. Both are just super fast in transients of attack and decay, coupled with great timbre (might be a bit better timbre on Be, though hard to say as I do not have headphones with the same tuning but different driver material).
I'm starting to think the next "big" thing is to spend even more time/effort on the housing of IEMs, creating different sound tube pathways, etc.
Logic dictates those, not being new, can't be the next big thing. Well, I love my Victor and they chose no coating and I care little for coatings myself esp. since most have a better way to do it which costs and many pass off the cheaper way like DLC which is blah unless you do it the Campfire or DUNU better way.
People love the driver count and the materials. So, those are the big things to them. You know a housing aspect won't be the next big thing. Not too many threads for earphones going on about stabilized wood but of course Be seems to be a replacement for Viagra for some people.
Last edited: