Redcarmoose
Headphoneus Supremus





Second day impressions of the ISN EBC80:
So in my belief in burn-in I have gone and done a day's worth now. Now very much in-line with yesterday's thoughts, the EBC80 is a midrange monster. At the same time ISN has not left anything out, meaning there is still exquisite balance. But, but the money here is found in technicalities, the EBC80 is not just a midrange monster, it is a technical marvel to boot. Yes, this is an end-game, for me anyway. Why? Ample involving stage, perfect balance of a tighter bass, that has the dexterity to never come-off limbering or slow, just tight (there) and glorious. The bass is always in the music though at times it is more in a polite place, letting everyone and their family know it is not left out or diminished, or shunted. Such a bass makes room for these fluid and detailed beyond description mids to flourish and take the stage running. This running means offering a fully separated bewildering amount of added multi-imaging. Yep, lots of sound stages inside other soundstages. Those 2 Sonion ESTs dial in a smart and less metallic treble than BAs, also not in possession of that tell-tale BA character……….you know what I’m talking about here.
Now yesterday I was talking trash about the double edge sword of having such a forward midrange in displacement. So today I went a little crazy at rolling cables (even now before burn-in) And what I found was both the 1 Knowles (high) and Sonion BA (mids)……..plus the Sonion (ultra-highs) were a little more mature and smoothed out, on my scorching treble, upper midrange test tracks. Trying the GD849 cable was a treat and with the full-on mid forward WM1A the sound had a portion of midrange luxuriousness! Then I went for the ASOS+X and obtained even more stage (but the GD849 has a stage too, glorious mid stage). Then finally rolled in my 2nd to favorite cable ever, the VIII. Here now the realism of a slightly more subdued midrange was a noticeable improvement (with over the top midrange tracks anyway). But remember for the last few sentences I have been trying to put-out-fires. What if we give the ISN EBC80, VIII and WM1A combo a walk in the park? What if we try to learn about regular audio listening………how’s that?
Well, the 2nd day has me very very impressed. So much so that I can recommend the EBC80 to one and all. Yep, it is so well rounded and plays well with any and all cables, any and all DAPs and even goes well with a number of ear-tips. Halt the confusion, stop the on-going research into countless IEM investigations…………..and this really doesn’t matter if you are looking at the $699.00 price-point or above it, or even below it, just get the EBC80 and leave the Discovery Thread! You don’t need to look anymore! I mean using the word warm and detailed is almost a contradiction in regular Head-Fi terms, but not here and not with the sound of the EBC80. And……….when I talk about mids being so prominent the mind instantly guesses there will be a compromise in bass. I can tell you an EDM song like Angst (RMX by twocolors) is full-on a bass lovers paradise! Just full on clear and tight bass details and that moving emotion. At 01:43 on the digital file there are fun separated way-high-up electronic cymbals a-float………..again just every genre and every DAP, we have performance. Vocals?
Please, need I even comment here?
Getting some listening to both the Fan 3 and the ISN EBC80:
Crystaline
Suldusk
Angst (RMX by twocolors)
Rammstein
Coming back to Suldusk
Sphaera
To where both the Fan 3 and EBC80 did a style of Suldusk playback that you could tell was right in their wheelhouse.
And even trying multiple Rock songs with the Fan 3 the pace issue was still there but a lot less of a concern. Still the Fan 3 while having great separation into an entertaining stage, is lacking the bass kick of just what the EBC80 does 24/7!



Penon Fan 3 first impressions:
Earlier today I started out using the HiBy R3 II and VIII cable with PAC LStips. To where sure the sound was OK, but seemed to be a little genre specific, meaning lesser paced Ambient tracks held the magic, and straight forward Rock tracks held a slight ever so slight smear in pace. OH, I almost forgot, I tuned the Bone Conduction Switch on at the start. Even with the Hiby R3 II with 3.1 software I was thinking (I would like) more stage from the Sony WM1A? The Sony fully enlarged the stage and gave an increase in pace across all genres. It was this new addition of spread out image itemization that was cool, and better than what the HiBy was up to. When switching the Bone Conduction on it was even more noticeable in activation………accessing an addition like a bigger recording room environment, with bigger and deeper drum hits……………more decay. Still I can’t help but hear this (ever so slight) softness that the Fan 3 holds across the board, and more with the Bone Conduction System in place. That while I have reviewed the Fan 1, and 2…..this Fan 3 is both more money and a new sound departure for Penon. To where sure I get where they were going as far as stage size, and there is a forgiving yet itemized treble, and a big set of mids, only slightly set back, but still there. The Fan 3’s fitment is way more practical than the Fan 2, being the nozzles don’t go as deep. And yet at the end of the day here with zero burn-in hours, I would say the Fan 3 is not exactly well-rounded that with Ambient tracks it is totally worth the cost of admission, only with Rock music I’m wanting a little better pace. Also vocals are not going to be totally the Fan 3’s strong point, but it is fun and unique IEM despite these accolades and truthful criticisms.
A boring generic IEM, the Fan 3 is not. And truly with certain (Ambient, Electronic ) musical genres the Fan 3 excels well above its price point, it is just not as well rounded (as some) in the end. Still what do I know, I haven’t even done burn-in yet? Yet the one thing I can guarantee you, is you have never heard an IEM exactly like the Fan 3.
Last edited: